Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T18:16:27.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Switzerland: Supreme Court Opinion in the Matter of El Nasr Export Import & Co. v. Anglo French Steel Corporation S.A.* (Jurisdiction of Arbitration Tribunal; Application for Stay of Arbitral Proceedings)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the English translation prepared for International Legal Materials by Charles H. Poncet, Lalive & Budin, Geneva, from the original French text in ATF 109 la 81-85.]

References

1) Translator's note: The appeal of public law (recours de droit public, staatsrechtliche Beschwerde, ricorso di diritto publico) gives a party the possibility to challenge cantonal (state) decisions on various constitutional grounds and/or because a “Concordat” (Konkordat, Concordato) was violated by a State Court. A Swiss “Concordat” is similar to a Uniform Act in the United States : it means that the same law applies in several states even though there is no Federal law applicable in a particular field. Under Swiss law, procedural matters fall within the legislative competence of the cantons.

2) Translator's note: The statute organizing the Federal Courts (loi federale d'organisation judiciaire ; Bundesgesetz uber die Organisation der Bundesrechtspflege ; legge federale sull'organizzazione giudiziaria) of December 16, 194 3 provides for the various possible appeals to the Swiss Supreme Court (Federal Tribunal).

3) Translator's note: Pursuant to article 87 of the aforesaid statute, a state decision can be challenged if it is “arbitrary”, i.e. totally contradicting the most elementary concepts of law. Yet such a challenge may only be brought against decisions which are final or causing irretrievable damage to the appelant.

4) Translator's note: in the Swiss System, some of the opinions of the Federal Tribunal are not published in the official Court reporter. Some may not even be published at all.

5) Translator's note: Article 38 reads as follows:

“The action (for annulment) shall not have the effect of suspending the award. However, the judicial authority provided for in Article 3 may grant it such effect if one of the parties so requests”.