Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:11:39.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Advisory Opinion with regard to Questions relating to the Interpretation of Provisions in the American Convention on Human Rights concerning the Death Penalty*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , March 1984 , pp. 320 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the text provided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The separate opinion of Judge Carlos Roberto Reina appears at I.L.M. page 348. The separate opinion of Judge Rodolfo E. Piza Escalante appears at page 349.

[The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has rendered two other Advisory Opinions: (1) Advisory Opinion OC-1/82 of September 24, 1982, at 22 I.L.M. 51 (1983) and (2) Advisory Opinion OC-2/82 of September 24, 1983, at 22 I.L.M. 37 (1983).]

References

* [Reproduced from the text provided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The separate opinion of Judge Carlos Roberto Reina appears at I.L.M. page 348. The separate opinion of Judge Rodolfo E. Piza Escalante appears at page 349.

[The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has rendered two other Advisory Opinions: (1) Advisory Opinion OC-1/82 of September 24, 1982, at 22 I.L.M. 51 (1983) and (2) Advisory Opinion OC-2/82 of September 24, 1983, at 22 I.L.M. 37 (1983).]