Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T23:15:22.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exclusion of Portugal From Unesco Meetings: Rejection of portugal's Request for I.C.J. Opinion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other Documents
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* [The resolution was adopted by the General Conference on November 28, 1966, by a vote of 60 to 38 with 4 abstentions. The letter of Portugal of June 30, 1965, requesting reference of the dispute to the International Court of Justice appears at page 190. The draft resolution submitted to the General Conference by the Legal Committee, which was not adopted by the Conference, appears at page 192.]

* [Reproduced from UNESCO Document 14 C/34 (July 22, 1966). The document also contains the summary records, omitted here, of the 7th-10th meetings of the 71st Session of the Executive Board, October 14-15, 1965, at which the decision was taken to refer the request of Portugal to the 14th Session of the General Conference.]

* [Reproduced from the Sixth Report of the Legal Committee, UNESCO Document 14 C/90 (November 25, 1966). The body of the report has been omitted, and only the draft resolution recommended by the Legal Committee of the General Conference is reproduced here.

[The resolution was not adopted by the General Conference. When the question was put whether to vote on this resolution or on that contained in Document 14 C/DR.207, the General Conference on November 28, 1966, by a vote of 60 to 36 with 3 abstentions decided to vote on the resolution contained in Document 14 C/DR.207, printed at page 188, and that resolution when put to a vote was adopted.]