Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:18:39.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Restrictions to the Death Penalty (articles 4(2) And 4(4) American Convention on Human Rights)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights.  08 September 1983 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Treaties — Conclusion and operation of — Reservations — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969 — Death penalty — Article 4(2) and 4(4) — Reservation relating to Article 4(4) — Effect of-Whether encompassing Article 4(2) — Advisory opinion of Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Disputes — Other intemational courts — Inter-American Court of Human Rights — Request by Inter-American Commission on Human Rights for advisory opinion — Objections by State party to American Convention on Human Rights to advisory jurisdiction — Existence of a disagreement directly involving State party — Whether necessary for State to have accepted jurisdiction of the Court — Article 62(1) of the Convention — Jurisdictional preconditions applicable to contentious jurisdiction — Whether applicable to advisory jurisdiction — Purpose of — Functions of the Commission — Decision by President of the Court to combine proceedings on jurisdiction and merits — Whether separate proceedings required — Considerations distinguishing contentious jurisdiction from advisory jurisdiction

Treaties — Interpretation of — Principles and rules of interpretation — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969 — Death penalty — Restrictions — Articles 4 (2) and 4 (4) — Literal interpretation — Object and purpose — Reservation relating to Article 4 (4) — Effect of — Whether encompassing Article 4 (2) — Inter-American Court of Human Rights — Request by American Commission on Human Rights for advisory opinion — Objections by State party to advisory jurisdiction — Existence of disagreement directly involving State party — Whether necessary for State party to have accepted jurisdiction of Court — Article 62 (1) of the Convention — Jurisdictional preconditions applicable to contentious jurisdiction — Whether applicable to advisory jurisdiction — Purpose of — Functions of Commission — Decision by President of the Court to combine proceedings on jurisdiction and merits — Whether separate proceedings required — Considerations distinguishing contentious jurisdiction from advisory jurisdiction

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)