Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T11:28:34.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pakelli Case

European Court of Human Rights.  25 April 1983 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For breaches of treaty obligations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 6(3)(c) — Right to defence counsel — Absence of sufficient means to pay for legal assistance — Whether interests of justice require granting of legal assistance for hearings — Just satisfaction in respect of breach established — Article 50

State responsibility — Damages (Measure of damages) — Grounds for awarding damages — Just satisfaction in respect of breaches of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 50 — Non-pecuniary loss — Whether established — Whether redress already furnished by finding of violation — Legal costs and expenses

The individual in international law — Aliens — Position of — Treatment by and responsibilities of the receiving State — Right to defence counsel — Absence of sufficient means to pay for legal assistance — Whether interests of justice require granting of legal assistance for hearings before court — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 6(3)(c)

Disputes — Other international courts — European Court of Human Rights — Proceedings for just satisfaction in respect of established breach of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 50 — Request to annul local judgment and direct respondent Government to disavow passages therein — Whether within powers of Court

The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — Right to defence counsel — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 6(3)(c) — Absence of sufficient means to pay for legal assistance — Whether interests of justice require granting of legal assistance for hearings — Right to a fair trial — Article 6(1) — Whether issue absorbed by Court’s findings on Article 6(3)(c) — Just satisfaction in respect of breach established — Article 50 — Request to annul local judgment and direct respondent Government to disavow passages therein — Whether within powers of Court — Non-pecuniary loss — Whether established — Whether redress already furnished by finding of violation — Legal costs and expenses

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)