Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T15:22:42.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Öztürk Case

European Court of Human Rights.  27 May 1983 ; 21 February 1984 ; 23 October 1984 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For breaches of treaty obligations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Right of accused to services of intepreter — Article 6(3)(e) — Whether State permitted to impose charge for interpreter's services as part of order for costs — Just satisfaction in respect of breach established — Article 50

State responsibility — Damages (Measure of damages) — Grounds for awarding damages — Breach of right of accused person to free services of interpreter — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 50 — Just satisfaction — Costs for reimbursement of interpretation fees — Legal costs incurred before Convention institutions — Whether borne by applicant

The individual in international law — Aliens — Position of — Treatment by and responsibilities of the receiving State — Right of accused person to services of interpreter — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 6(3)(e) — Whether State permitted to impose charge for interpreter's services as part of order for costs

Treaties — Interpretation of — Principles and rules of interpretation — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 6(3)(e) — Meaning of “criminal offence” — Autonomy of term — Object and purpose of Article 6

Disputes — Other international courts — European Court of Human Rights — Jurisdiction of Chamber — Relinquishment of jurisdiction in favour of plenary Court — Whether case raises serious questions affecting interpretation of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — Right of person accused of criminal offence to services of interpreter — Whether State permitted to impose charge for interpreter's services as part of order for costs — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 6(3)(e) — Whether applicable — Decriminalization of minor traffic offences as “regulatory” offences — Whether criminal offences — Autonomy of term — Whether text defining offence part of criminal law — Nature of offence — Nature and severity of penalty — Purpose of penalty — Whether deterrent and punitive — Object and purpose of Article 6 — European Court of Human Rights — Jurisdiction of Chamber — Relinquishment of jurisdiction in favour of plenary Court — Whether case raises serious questions affecting interpretation of Convention — Article 50 — Just satisfaction in respect of breach established — Costs for reimbursement of interpretation fees — Legal costs incurred before Convention institutions — Whether borne by applicant

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)