Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:08:00.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NATO Strategic Concept (German Participation) Case

Germany, Federal Republic of.  22 November 2001 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Treaties — Conclusion and operation — Definition of treaty — Whether including amendments to treaties — Whether including acts of organs of international organizations — Indicative factors establishing existence of treaty — Presence of ratification clause — Objective factors indicating intention to create international legal obligations — Whether possible to imply amendment to treaty in absence of such factors — Nature of subject matter — Wording consisting primarily of general declarations of intent and analysis of political situation — Relevance of fundamental political significance of agreement for Member States

Treaties — Conclusion and operation — Constitutional limitations — Treaties regulating political relations — Requirement of parliamentary legislative approval — Basic Law of Federal Republic of Germany, Article 59(2) — Commitments falling below level of conclusion of treaty — Whether requiring approval of legislature — Concretization of openly formulated treaty provisions not requiring approval — Budgetary implications and troop deployments requiring approval

International organizations — Acts — North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) — NATO Treaty, 1949 — New Strategic Concept 1999 — Whether constituting amendment of NATO Treaty — Significance of express declaration that purpose and nature of NATO Alliance unchanged — Whether Strategic Concept merely constituting development of openly formulated treaty provisions — Distinction between collective self-defence and maintenance of peace and security — Function of NATO under Article 5 of collective self-defence — Non-Article 5 “crisis response” operations — Whether falling outside framework of existing NATO Treaty commitments — Whether existing NATO Treaty framework sufficiently broad to permit its adaptation to changing threats to peace and security following the end of the Cold War

War and armed conflict — Use of force — Collective security — Whether new NATO Strategic Concept consistent with basic aims of NATO Treaty and United Nations Charter — Relationship between NATO and United Nations — Primary responsibility of United Nations for maintenance of international peace and security — Regional role of NATO — Whether provision for “crisis response” operations changing role of NATO from peaceful to aggressive actor

States — Conduct of foreign relations — Participation in systems of collective security — Constitutional legality — Scope of authorization contained in Basic Law of Federal Republic of Germany, Article 24(2) — Whether covering participation by Germany in NATO “crisis response” operations where no territorial threat to Member States — The law of the Federal Republic of Germany

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)