Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-jkr4m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-03T03:14:33.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mike Campbell (Pvt) Ltd and William Michael Campbell v. Minister of National Security Responsible for Land, Land Reform and Resettlement and Attorney-General

Zimbabwe.  22 January 2008 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — International human rights instruments requiring incorporation into Zimbabwean law in accordance with Section 111B(1) of Constitution — Zimbabwe Legislature having power to make laws for peace, order and good government of Zimbabwe — Whether sovereign State having power to acquire private property compulsorily within its territory for public purposes — Land reform programme in Zimbabwe — Expropriation — Colonial history — Constitution of Zimbabwe — Controlled Constitution — Provisions — Interpretation — Amendment 17 inserting Section 16B into Constitution — Respondents compulsorily acquiring agricultural land belonging to applicants under Section 16B of Constitution — Whether enactment of Amendment 17 violating Constitution — Whether acquisition of applicants’ agricultural land violating Declaration of Rights contained in Constitution — Constitution of Zimbabwe, Sections 11, 16(1), 18(1), 18(9) and 23(1) — Nature of rights in Constitution — Entitlement to rights subject to Section 52(1) of Constitution — Whether Legislature properly exercising its powers — Whether Constitution barring Legislature from removing right to property in agricultural land and right to remedies for protection of that right

Human rights — Right to property — Fundamental right of property in agricultural land — Sections 11 and 16(1) of Constitution of Zimbabwe — Whether Zimbabwe having power to acquire private property compulsorily within its territory for public purposes — Respondents compulsorily acquiring agricultural land belonging to applicants under Section 16B of Constitution introduced by Amendment 17 — Whether fundamental rights immutable — Protection of right to property — Section 52(1) of Constitution — Section 18(1) and (9) of Constitution of Zimbabwe — Whether acquisition of applicants’ private agricultural land lawful

Human rights — Right to remedies — Right to protection of law — Right to fair hearing and determination of civil rights or obligations by court of law — Section 18(1) and (9) of Constitution of Zimbabwe — Section 16B(3) of Constitution introduced by Amendment 17 amending Section 18(1) and (9) of Constitution — Section 16B(3) of Constitution ousting jurisdiction of courts — Whether Section 16B(3) complying with Section 52(1) of Constitution — Whether question of protection of individual’s right to private property under Constitution judicial in character — Whether failure by respondents to pay fair compensation within reasonable time invalidating acquisition made within terms of Section 16B(2)(a) of Constitution — The law of Zimbabwe

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)