Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T22:13:01.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In re McFarland

United Kingdom, Northern Ireland.  29 April 2004 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Remedies — Persons wrongfully convicted — Compensation — Applicant imprisoned following conviction — Subsequent quashing of conviction — 1976 and 1985 ministerial policy statements concerning payments of compensation from public funds — 1985 statement referring to Article 14(6) of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 (“ICCPR”) and ex gratia payment of compensation — Whether applicant having right to compensation under Article 14(6) of ICCPR or Section 133 of Criminal Justice Act 1988 — Whether ex gratia payment of compensation appropriate — Whether magistrate public authority — Whether serious default on part of member of public authority — Whether Secretary of State acting unlawfully by refusing applicant compensation

Relationship of international law and municipal law — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Article 14(6) — 1985 ministerial policy statement referring to international obligations with respect to payment of compensation — 1985 statement referring to Article 14(6) of ICCPR — Section 133(1) of Criminal Justice Act 1988 giving statutory effect to Article 14(6) of ICCPR — Whether 1988 Act superseding 1985 statement — Whether “reversal” of conviction — Whether applicant could bring case within Article 14(6) of ICCPR or Section 133 of 1988 Act — Ministerial policy statements — Interpretation — Whether binding — Whether Secretary of State acting unlawfully by refusing applicant compensation

Treaties — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Article 14(6) — Right to compensation for punishment resulting from wrongful conviction — Whether applicant having right to compensation under Article 14(6) of ICCPR — The law of Northern Ireland

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)