Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:18:24.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. Iran)

International Court of Justice.  15 December 1979 ; 24 December 1979 ; 24 May 1980 ; 12 May 1981 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law in general — Sources — Diplomatic law — Evolution of — Contrasted with other aspects of international law Relevance of universal sources

States as international persons — Succession of governments — Upon termination of a rebellion — Regime overthrown by revolution — Revolutionary government bound by treaties entered into by predecessor — Whether special allowance should be made for revolutionary circumstances

State responsibility — Nature and kind of State responsibility — For breaches of treaty obligations — Effect of breaches of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961, and Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963 by receiving State — International responsibility — Whether responsibility in any way mitigated by alleged activities of diplomatic mission and policies of sending States — Duty to end continuing breach — Duty make reparation

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of State responsibility — For Wrong unconnected with contractual obligations — Acts and omissions of State officials — Executive action inaction — Seizure of embassy and diplomatic staff by rioters — Security forces taking no to steps to prevent seizure — Whether State responsible for failure to protect embassy — Subsequent approval of rioters' actions — Whether state responsible for continued detention of staff as hostages

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of State responsibility — For wrongs unconnected with contractual obligations — Acts of insurgents, rioters and private individuals in general — Seizure of embassy and diplomatic staff by rioters — Whether imputable to State — Seizure following inflammatory statements by members of Government — Subsequent Government approval of seizure and continued detention of hostages by rioters — Rioters as “agents” of the State

State responsibility — Damage — Award of damage in general — Violation of treaty obligations leading to injury — Duty to make reparation

The individual in international law — Extradition — In general — Demands by revolutionary government for extradition of deposed ruler — Taking of diplomatic hostages in support of demand

Diplomatic and consular intercourse and privileges — Permanent diplomatic envoys — Position and functions of diplomatic envoys — Duty of receiving State to protect envoys and their staff in the discharge of their functions — Function of gathering information by lawful means — Difference between this function and espionage — Duty of non — interference in the affairs of the receiving State — Sanctions for violation of this duty — Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961, Articles 9, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 39 and 41

Diplomatic and consular intercourse and privileges — Permanent diplomatic envoys — Privileges and immunities — Subordinate members of the diplomatic staff — Entitlement to protection in discharge of functions — Inviolability and immunity from jurisdiction — Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961, Articles 22, 29, 30 and 31

Diplomatic and consular intercourse and privileges — Permanent diplomatic envoys — Privileges and immunities — Diplomatic premises — Inviolability of diplomatic premises, property, archives and documents — Seizure of hostages on diplomatic premises — Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961, Articles 22 and 24

Diplomatic and consular intercourse and privileges — Consuls — Position and functions of consuls — Consular function of assisting nationals — Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963

Diplomatic and consular intercourse and privileges — Consuls — Privileges and immunities of consuls — Inviolability of consuls and consular premises, archives and documents — Immunity of consular staff from jurisdiction — Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963

Diplomatic and consular intercourse and privileges — Miscellaneous — Members of embassy's technical and administrative staff — Entitlement to diplomatic privileges and immunities — Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961, Article 1 (d) and 37 (2)

Treaties — Termination — By act of party — Non-performance by one party — Acts allegedly inconsistent with Treaty of Amity — Whether debarring State responsible from relying on Treaty in respect of matters taking place prior to these acts

International organization and administration — The United Nations — The Security Council — Dispute referred to Security Council and International Court of Justice — Whether Court entitled to hear case — Whether appropriate for Court to indicate interim measures of protection — Different roles of Court and Security Council

lntemational organization and administration — The United Nations — Other Organs — Secretary — General of the United Nations — Whether appropriate for International Court of Justice to adjudicate upon dispute in respect of which the Secretary — General has established a fact — finding commission — Different roles of Court and commission

Disputes — International Court of Justice — Contentious jurisdiction — Competence — Unilateral application to Court — Whether Court possessing jurisdiction under Optional Protocols to Vienna Conventionon Diplomatic and Consular Relations — Whether Court possessing jurisdiction under treaty which does not expressly provide for unilateral application — Application allegedly referring only to one part of wider dispute — Whether Court may consider that part alone — Whether appropriate for Court to hear case which is also being considered by Security Council and in respect of which the Secretary — General of the United Nations has established a factfinding commission — Difference between adjudication and mediation — Justiciability of dispute

Disputes — International Court of Justice — Contentious jurisdiction — Procedure — Absence of Respondent State from proceedings Indication of provisional measures — Responsibility of Court to protect interests of both parties when indicating provisional measures — Scope of provisional measures — Inevitability of overlap with claim on the merits

Disputes — Conciliation — Fact — finding commission — Complementary roles of commission and International Court of Justice

Disputes — Unilateral means of redress short of war — Economic sanctions — Attempt to rescue hostages by military operation — Legality — Effect of these measures upon consideration of taking of hostages by International Court — Whether calculated to undermine respect for judicial process — Whether legitimate self — defence

Disputes — Negotiation — Complementary roles of negotiation and adjudication in settlement of dispute — Whether International Court should encourage negotiation by advising parties as to form and content of negotiations

Diplomatic and consular intercourse and privileges — Permanent diplomatic envoys — Privileges and immunities of diplomatic envoys and their staff — Members of technical and administrative staff — Inviolability of diplomatic staff — Immunity from criminal proceedings — Duty of receiving State to protect members of diplomatic staff in the discharge of diplomatic functions — Diplomatic premises — Inviolability of diplomatic premises, archives and documents — Duty of receiving State to protect — Seizure of embassy and taking of diplomatic hostages — Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961

Consuls — Privileges and immunities of consular staff and premises — Duty of receiving State to protect — Consular function of assisting nationals — Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, 1963

Nature of diplomatic and consular law — Importance in the international community — Contributions made to development of diplomatic law by all States and streams of legal thought — Diplomatic law a self-contained body of rules with its own sanctions for cases of abuse — Alleged acts of espionage by members of diplomatic staff to be dealt with only in accordance with Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961 — Alleged acts of espionage incapable of justifying violation of diplomatic immunity

State responsibility — For acts of rioters — Rioters seizing embassy after inflammatory statements by members of Government — Action not imputable to State — Government subsequently approving rioters' acts and encouraging detention of hostages — Rioters becoming agents of State — Violation of treaty obligations — Whether engaging international responsibility of State — Duty to make reparation

International Court of Justice — Competence — Optional Protocols to Vienna Convention on Diplomatic and Consular Relations — Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Rights, 1955, between United States and Iran — Indication of provisional measures of protection — Scope of such measures — Whether fact that dispute under consideration by United Nations Security Council debars Court from pronouncing upon it — Establishment of fact-finding commission by United Nations Secretary-General — Whether Court precluded from considering application because it represents only one aspect of a dispute

Unilateral action by Applicant — Economic sanctions — Military operation in attempt to rescue hostages — Whether undermining respect for judicial process — Whether affecting legality of initial actions by Respondent

Treaties — Breach — Whether hostile acts by Applicant prevent it from relying upon compromissory clause in Treaty of Amity

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)