Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T16:36:42.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)

International Court of Justice.  08 December 2000 ; 14 February 2002 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International criminal law — Jurisdiction — Universal — Whether exercise of universal jurisdiction in absentia consistent with international law — Issue and international circulation of arrest warrant — Relationship between jurisdiction and immunities — Distinction between immunity from jurisdiction and impunity — War crimes — Crimes against humanity

State immunity — Jurisdictional immunities — Foreign minister — Purpose of immunities — Whether immunities of Head of State and diplomatic agents relevant to determining immunities of incumbent foreign minister — Whether incumbent foreign minister enjoying full immunity from criminal prosecution and inviolability during period of office — Whether official and private acts covered during term of office — Whether immunity remaining after person concerned has ceased to hold office — Whether exception to immunity in cases where person accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity — Issue and international circulation of arrest warrant — Whether violating immunity even if warrant not enforced

International Court of Justice — Jurisdiction — Optional Clause — Statute of the Court, Article 36(2) — Declaration accepting jurisdiction of the Court — Date at which jurisdiction to be established — Definition of a legal dispute — Existence of a legal dispute concerning arrest warrant — Whether events subsequent to act instituting proceedings depriving Court of jurisdiction

International Court of Justice — Admissibility — Date at which question of admissibility to be determined — Effect of events which occurred after the filing of Application — Whether dispute transformed into one of a radically different character — Whether adjudication would seriously jeopardize principle of procedural fairness and administration of justice — Whether Application deprived of object — Whether request for provisional measures deprived of object

International Court of Justice — Procedure — Claim in Application instituting proceedings not made in final submissions — Effect of non ultra petita rule — Whether Court permitted to rule on withdrawn claim in operative part of Judgment — Whether Court permitted to consider elements of withdrawn claim in reaching decision

International Court of Justice — Provisional measures of protection — Requirement of prima facie jurisdiction — Object of provisional measures — Preservation of respective rights of the Parties pending decision on the merits — Criteria for indication of provisional measures — Risk of irreparable prejudice to rights — Urgency — Whether provisional measures required in circumstances of case

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)