Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T21:20:54.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Améndola Massiotti And Baritussio v. Uruguay

United Nations) Human Rights Committee.  26 July 1982 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For breaches of treaty obligations — Allegations of inhuman treatment and torture — Arbitrary detention — Obligation to provide effective remedies — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 — Optional Protocol — United Nations Human Rights Committee — Competence to consider communication from complainants abroad

International organization and administration — The United Nations — Other organs of the United Nations — Human Rights Committee — Competence to consider communication from complainants abroad — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 — Optional Protocol

The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — Detention incommunicado — Whether conditions of detention amounted to inhuman treatment or torture — Continued detention after having served sentence — Continued detention after having signed document for provisional release — Whether arbitrary detention — Right to review of detention by a competent court — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 — Optional Protocol — United Nations Human Rights Committee — Competence to consider communication from complainants abroad

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)