Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:09:04.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Al-Saadoon and Others v. Secretary of State for Defence

United Kingdom, England.  17 March 2015 ; 09 September 2016 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Treaties — Human rights treaties — Application — Scope — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 1 — Duty of parties to secure rights and freedoms under European Convention to persons within their jurisdiction — Extent of jurisdiction — Claimants alleging ill-treatment and unlawful detention during British military involvement in Iraq between 2003 and 2009 — Whether Article 1 of European Convention applicable in test cases — Strasbourg jurisprudence — Banković — Concept of jurisdiction primarily territorial — Extraterritorial jurisdiction in exceptional cases only — State agent authority and control — Effective control over an area — Convention legal space (espace juridique) — Al-Skeini — Widening of exceptional categories — Division and tailoring of Convention rights — Exceptional category of State agent authority and control applicable in present case — Exercise of public powers — Whether United Kingdom exercising authority and control by virtue of exercising public powers normally exercised by Iraqi Government — Whether conditions for occupation met — Case-by-case factual analysis — Exercise of physical power and control of individuals — Scope — Whether requiring greater degree of power and control than that represented by use of lethal or potentially lethal force alone — Whether those claimants transferred into custody of United States within jurisdiction of United Kingdom for purpose of Article 1 of European Convention — Whether and to what extent European Convention applying to British armed forces in Iraq — Whether United Kingdom having duty to investigate alleged human rights violations — Whether United Kingdom having jurisdiction for purpose of Article 1 of European Convention

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 1 — Scope of application — United Kingdom courts to construe reach of Article 1 in accordance with Strasbourg jurisprudence — Identification of underlying principles of Strasbourg jurisprudence — Whether United Kingdom having duty to investigate alleged human rights violations — Whether United Kingdom having jurisdiction for purpose of Article 1

Human rights — Treaties — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 3 — Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment — Investigative obligations — Whether and in what circumstances investigative obligation arising in Soering-type cases — Whether adjectival duty on Contracting State to investigate allegations of breach of Soering duty after the event — Complaint that claimants suffering serious ill-treatment after having been handed over into United States custody — Whether requiring investigation under Article 3 — Whether factual basis for arguable claim that British forces complicit in ill-treatment — Extent to which investigative obligation arising under Article 3 in respect of handover cases

Human rights — Treaties — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 5 — Right to liberty — Investigative obligations — Arbitrary detention — Whether investigative obligation arising in all cases of detention arguably in violation of Article 5 — Article 5 requiring Contracting States’ authorities to investigate an arguable claim of enforced disappearance — Whether duty extending to detention without judicial scrutiny or control, even if detention not secret or unacknowledged — Effect of international humanitarian law on Article 5 — Whether Article 5 modified or displaced by international humanitarian law during international armed conflict — Extent to which investigative obligation arising in respect of cases within Article 5

Treaties — Interpretation — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 5 — Extent of obligations under Article 5 — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Article 31(3)(c) — Applicable rules of international law — 1992 UN Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance — Council of Europe Resolution 1463 of 3 October 2005 — International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, 2006 — Strasbourg jurisprudence — Requirement under Article 5 that Contracting States’ authorities investigate arguable claim of enforced disappearance — Whether duty to extend to detention without judicial scrutiny or control, even if detention not secret or unacknowledged

Treaties — Application — United Nations Convention against Torture, 1984 (“UNCAT”) — Obligations of United Kingdom — Whether UNCAT provisions giving rise to domestically enforceable legal rights — As a treaty — On basis of customary international law — European Convention on Human Rights to be interpreted in harmony with rules of international law of which it forms part — Whether broader investigative duty imposed by Article 12 of UNCAT — Consideration of United Kingdom’s compliance with obligations under Articles 10 and 11 of UNCAT — Whether appropriate in context of investigating circumstances where duty to investigate allegation of torture or serious mistreatment — Whether UNCAT having any impact on investigative duties under Articles 2 and 3 of European Convention

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Application — United Nations Convention against Torture, 1984 — Whether UNCAT provisions giving rise to domestically enforceable legal rights — Whether implemented into United Kingdom law — United Kingdom only implementing Article 4 of UNCAT in Section 134 of Criminal Justice Act — Whether principle of legality applicable — Whether rights in question part of domestic law — Human rights protections — Implementation of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Human Rights Act 1998

War and armed conflict — British military involvement in Iraq between 2003 and 2009 — Invasion — Occupation — Post-occupation — Alleged human rights violations against Iraqi civilians by British soldiers in Iraq — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Application — International humanitarian law — Whether displacing or modifying European Convention — Whether both applying to detention issues — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)