Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T04:26:35.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yaung Chi Oo Trading Pte Ltd v. Government of the Union of Myanmar

Arbitration Tribunal.  27 February 2002 ; 31 March 2003 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Provisional measures — Standard of jurisdiction required — Prima facie standard — Purpose to safeguard interests of parties — Whether provisional measures appropriate where loss could be compensated by monetary damages

Arbitration — Jurisdiction — Privity — Whether mutuality of consent existing — Whether treaty in force at time of claim

Arbitration — Jurisdiction — Exhaustion of local and contractual remedies — Differences between international commercial arbitration under treaty and local actions under municipal law — Whether any treaty requirement to exhaust other remedies existing

Economics, trade and finance — Investment — ASEAN Investment Agreement, 1987 — Interpretation — Interpretation of “investment” — Whether direct inward investment from another Member State — Whether investing company effectively managed from State of incorporation — Presumption against loss of treaty protection — Whether investment approved in writing and registered

Treaties — Interpretation — ASEAN Framework Agreement, 1998 — Interpretation of “ASEAN investment” — Relation to 1987 Agreement — Whether intending to amend earlier treaty or operate cumulatively — Whether concepts of investment distinct — Relevance of State practice in ASEAN — Object and purpose of treaty

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)