Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T15:22:36.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Williams and Humbert Ltd. v. W. & H. Trade Marks (Jersey) Ltd. Rumasa S.A. and Others v. Multinvest (U.K.) and Others

England.  19 December 1984 ; 03 April 1985 ; 12 December 1985 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Recognition and enforcement of foreign law — Grounds for refusal of recognition — Legislation contrary to human rights — Penal and revenue laws — Legislation providing for expropriation of property — Expropriation of shares in company — Company seeking to bring claim in England after expropriation — Whether English courts thereby asked to enforce expropriatory legislation — Act of State — Whether English courts will question the motives and good faith of foreign government

Expropriation — Discriminatory — Whether expropriation measure directed against particular individuals contrary to international law — General international acceptance of expropriation — Property situated outside expropriating State — Expropriation of shares in company incorporated in expropriating State — Effect on company's assets in other States

Human rights — Enforcement by national courts — Non-enforcement of foreign law which is contrary to human rights

Jurisdiction — Extraterritorial — Expropriation of shares in company — Effect on company's assets in another State — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)