Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T12:16:38.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Van Der Sluijs, Zuiderveld and Klappe

European Court of Human Rights.  22 May 1984 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Arrest and detention — Freedom from — Permissible restrictions — Right to be brought promptly before officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 5(3) — Military discipline — Authority with advisory power — Auditeur-militair — Internal practice of following his advice — Whether sufficiently independent — Officier-commissaris — Whether empowered to exercise judicial authority — Whether hearing on referral for trial before military court sufficient degree of judicial control

Human rights — Procedure — Victim of a human rights violation — Definition — Whether fact that applicants' periods of detention on remand taken into account in sentencing meant that they ceased to be victims in respect of alleged violations regarding their detention on remand — Preliminary objection by government not referred to before Court — Presumption that objection withdrawn

Damages — Human rights violations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 50 — Non-pecuniary loss

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)