Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T11:45:40.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company and California Asiatic Oil Company v. The Government of the Libyan Arab Republic

Arbitration Tribunals (Duputy, Sole Arbitrator).  27 November 1975 ; 19 January 1977 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law in general — Relation to municipal law — Principles of — Inclusion in municipal law — Principles as to restitutio in integrum — Application by arbitral tribunal

States as international persons — In general — Sovereignty and independence — In matters of domestic jurisdiction — International commitments with private party — Concessionary contracts — Right to nationalize — Whether a mandatory rule of general international law (jus cogens)

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For revocation of contracts — State bound by acts of its organs — Act of Minister — Conclusion by Minister of Deeds of Concession — State bound thereby

International organizations — United Nations — General Assembly — Resolutions of — As reflecting or affecting customary international law — Nature of resolution — Character of voting thereon — Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources — Charter of Economic Rights and Duties

Disputes — Arbitration — In general — Conception and function of — Contractual nature of — Effect of nationalization measures on arbitration provisions in Deeds of Concession — Autonomy or independence of arbitration clause — Need for compliance by parties with pre-requisites — Attempts to bring about friendly settlement

Disputes — Arbitration — Conception and function of arbitration — Restriction to matters of principle to exclusion of question of enforcement

Disputes — Arbitration — In general — Law applied by Arbitral Tribunals — Absence of agreement as to choice of law — Determination by Arbitral Tribunal as to law or systems of law applicable — Choice between municipal law and international law — Relevance of intention of parties — Relevance of provision that arbitrator be appointed by President of International Court of Justice — Relevance of exclusion of municipal law in provisions in Deeds of Concession as to Rules of Procedure

Disputes — Arbitration — Arbitration Treaty — Appointment of Arbitrator — Failure of one party to appoint arbitrator — Appointment by President of International Court of Justice

Disputes — Arbitration — In general — Appointment of arbitrator — Failure to appoint arbitrator — Rejection of request for arbitration — Appointment of arbitrator by President of International Court of Justice — Failure of defendant to take part in proceedings — Effect on rights of plaintiff

Disputes — Arbitration — Procedure — Waiver of oral argument — Arbitration governed by Rules of Procedure to exclusion of local law — Rules of 1962 prepared by Bureau of Permanent Court of Arbitration — Draft Convention on Arbitral Procedure adopted 1955 by U.N. International Law Commission

Disputes — Arbitration — Procedure — Waiver of oral arguments — Possibility of withdrawing dispute — Non — appearance of one party — Question as to identity of defendant — Attempt to distinguish between State and Minister by whom Deeds of Concession concluded

Disputes — Arbitration — Procedure — Competence to determine jurisdiction — Division of proceedings into two parts — Part devoted to question of jurisdiction — Arbitrator as judge of his own jurisdiction

Disputes — Arbitration — Procedure — Competence to determine jurisdiction — Question as to existence of dispute or difference — Divergence of interest and opposition of legal views constituting basis for litigation

Disputes — Arbitration — Procedure — Competence — Loss by plaintiffs of status as concession holders after nationalization — Whether affecting operation of arbitration clause

Disputes — Arbitration — The Award — Scope and binding force — Judgment by default — Plaintiff’s request for ruling by tribunal — Decision as to restitutio in integrum — Time limit therefor

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For revocation of, or interference with, concessionary contracts — Whether Deeds of Concession are contracts — Nature of concessions — Oil concession — Applicable law — Right of parties to choose law — Application of choice of law clause in contract — Binding nature of contracts derived from international law — “Internationalization” of contract between State and alien private person — Meaning and scope of nationalization of concessions — Whether or not nationalization measures breach obligations under contracts — Whether Deeds of Concession are “administrative contracts” — Whether nationalization terminates legal status of concession holders — Obligation to give full effect to Deeds of Concession after nationalization — Restitutio in integrum — Application of municipal law — Relevance of Muslim law

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)