Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:58:48.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re Application by McGuigan for Judicial Review; Re Application by McKenna for Judicial Review

United Kingdom, Northern Ireland.  27 October 2017 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Prohibition on torture and inhuman and degrading treatment — Whether use of torture in Northern Ireland authorized by United Kingdom Government — Whether evidence to warrant investigation — Articles 2 and 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Investigative or procedural aspect — Duty to investigate — Standard of scrutiny — Nature and severity of case — Whether State enjoying margin of appreciation — Independence of investigation — Allegation that United Kingdom Government authorizing use of torture in Northern Ireland — Whether respondents failing to ensure full, independent and effective investigation into use of torture under Articles 2 and 3 of Convention, common law and customary international law — Whether Northern Ireland complying with Convention

Relationship of international law and municipal law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Articles 2 and 3 — Human Rights Act 1998 coming into force on 2 October 2000 — Investigative or procedural aspect of Articles 2 and 3 of Convention — Events occurring in 1970s — Events pre-dating coming into force of Human Rights Act 1998 — Whether breach of Articles 2 and 3 of Convention — Whether enforceable under domestic law — Governing authority — In re McKerrIn re Finucane — Whether investigation required under common law — Whether investigation required under customary international law — Whether customary international law imposing obligation at common law to investigate conduct constituting torture or inhuman or degrading treatment — Whether Strasbourg Court or domestic court best placed to assess whether misled by United Kingdom Government

Terrorism — Northern Ireland in 1970s — Detainees suspected of terrorist activity — Allegation that United Kingdom Government authorizing use of torture in Northern Ireland — Whether State having duty to investigate — Articles 2 and 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Investigative or procedural aspect — Whether evidence to warrant investigation — Whether respondents failing to ensure full, independent and effective investigation into use of torture under Articles 2 and 3 of Convention, common law and customary international law — Whether Northern Ireland complying with Convention — The law of Northern Ireland

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)