Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T17:23:05.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lithgow and Others

European Commission of Human.  07 March 1984 ; 08 July 1986 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Expropriation — Compensation — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 — Requirement that taking of property be in the public interest — Whether importing duty to pay compensation — Duty to maintain reasonable balance between public interest and the rights of the individual — Implied duty to pay compensation for expropriated property — Measure of compensation — International law standard of compensation — Whether incorporated in Article 1 — Whether international law standard applicable to the taking by a State of the property of its own nationals — Whether State entitled to pay compensation at less than the full market value for property taken from nationals — Valuation of property — Margin of appreciation of expropriating State — Court’s role limited to determining whether that margin has been exceeded — Nationalization of shares in aircraft and shipbuilding companies — Valuation based upon value of shares during reference period rather than value of companies’ assets — Reference period ending more than three years before nationalization took effect — No allowance made for changes in value or inflation during the intervening period — Whether unfair — United Kingdom Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Act 1977

Human rights — Property rights — Right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions — Right not to be deprived of property except in the public interest — Whether duty to pay compensation in cases of deprivation of property — Discrimination — Scope of prohibition — Differentiation based upon objective and reasonable grounds not discriminatory — Alleged discrimination in compensation arrangements between owners of different assets nationalized or compulsorily acquired — Right to a hearing — Scope and extent — Whether extending to right to challenge validity of legislation in courts — Whether requirement that disputes be settled by arbitration tribunal an unreasonable denial of right of access to courts — Whether tribunal impartial, independent and efficient — Requirement that shareholders in nationalized company act collectively through stockholders’ representative — Whether a violation of individual’s right to a hearing — Enforcement of human rights — Right to a remedy under national law — Abuse of rights — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Articles 6, 13, 14, 17 and 18 — Protocol No. 1, Article 1

Treaties — International — Ordinary meaning of words — Travaux préparatoires — Subsequent practice — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)