Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T16:25:17.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca

United States Supreme Court.  09 March 1987 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Aliens — Refugees — Asylum — United Nations Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, 1967 — United States Refugee Act 1980 — Well-founded fear of persecution — Meaning — Whether applicant for asylum required to show clear probability of persecution in order to establish well — founded fear — Distinction between discretionary provisions on asylum and mandatory provision on withholding deportation — Language and legislative history of the Refugee Act 1980 — Whether passed to give effect to the 1967 Protocol

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Interpretation — By municipal courts — United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees — Extent to which United States court should take note of High Commissioner’s interpretation of United Nations Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, 1967

Treaties — Interpretation — Agencies of interpretation — United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees — Extent to which United States court should take note of High Commissioner’s interpretation of United Nations Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, 1967 — The law of the United States

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)