Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T05:49:14.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg v. Compagnie Luxembourgeoise de Télédiffusion and Compagnie Luxembourgeoise Assurance “Le Foyer”

Luxembourg.  12 November 1987 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — Territorial — Foreign armed forces — NATO Status of Forces Agreement, 1951 — Preamble and Article VIII(5)(a) and (b) — Claim for damage caused by member of NATO armed “force” — Accident to Belgian military aircraft over Luxembourg territory causing loss of life and damage to property — Claim against Luxembourg as receiving State — Dispute over applicability of Status of Forces Agreement — Whether aircraft operating within framework of NATO — Jurisdiction of Luxembourg courts

State responsibility — Tort — Damage caused by crash of foreign military aircraft — Responsibility of sending and receiving States — NATO Status of Forces Agreement, 1951 — Article VIII(5)(e)(i) — One sending State alone responsible — Fixed distribution of responsibility for payment of award between receiving and sending States — Whether mandatory — Article VIII(5)(f) — Possibility of request to North Atlantic Council to arrange alternative settlement

Air — Military aircraft — Overflight of foreign territory — Requirement of consent — Accident — Liability for damage — NATO Status of Forces Agreement, 1951 — Preamble — Whether requiring consent of receiving State to each specific flight or whether general consent sufficient — Whether tacit general consent may be implied from behaviour of receiving State — Practice in relation to other signatory States to the Agreement

Treaties — Interpretation — Preamble — Extent to which provisions of preamble are enforceable — NATO Status of Forces Agreement, 1951 — Overflight by foreign military aircraft — Consent requirement — Interpretation by reference to State practice — The law of Luxembourg

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)