Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T15:28:34.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attorney-General of the United States v. NV Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart

Netherlands.  17 October 1969 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

States as international persons — In general — Recognition of acts of foreign States and governments — Confiscation of enemy property during Second World War — Property situated in confiscating State — Whether municipal courts have jurisdiction to examine legality under international law of confiscation by foreign State — Whether retention of confiscated assets following termination of hostilities violates international law — United States Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 — The law of the Netherlands

The individual in international law — Aliens — Position of — Respect for property — Expropriation — Wartime confiscation of property of enemy aliens — Whether amounts to permanent deprivation of ownership — Whether retention of confiscated assets following termination of hostilities violates international law — United States Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 — The law of the Netherlands

War and neutrality — War in general — Effects of outbreak of war — On enemy subjects with regard to their property and other rights — United States Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 — Confiscation of enemy property — Property situated in confiscating State — Whether municipal courts have jurisdiction to examine legality under international law of confiscation by foreign State — The law of the Netherlands

War and neutrality — War in general — Enemy character — Of corporations — Control test — United States Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 — The law of the Netherlands

War and neutrality — War in general — Enforcement of the laws of war — Compensation and reparation — Right to seize assets of subjects of aggressor State as reparation for war damage — Whether limited by international law to cases where treaty requires national State to compensate its subjects — The law of the Nether lands

i.—Over Territory in general and Persons and Property situated therein. Territorial Limits of Jurisdiction. Expropriation of Alien Property.

Jurisdiction — In general — Territorial — Territorial limits of jurisdiction — Expropriation of alien property — Confiscation of enemy property during Second World War — United States Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 — Property situated in confiscating State — Whether municipal courts have jurisdiction to examine legality under international law of confiscation by foreign State — Whether wartime confiscation amounts to permanent deprivation of ownership — Whether retention of confiscated assets following termination of hostilities violates international law — Right to seize assets of subjects of aggressor State as reparation for war damage — Whether limited by international law to cases where treaty requires national State to compensate its subjects — Enemy character of corporations — Control test — The law of the Netherlands

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)