Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T09:18:39.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ambatielos Claim (Greece v. United Kingdom).

Commission of Arbitration.  06 March 1956 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State Responsibility — Claims — In General — Right of Claimant to Change Legal Basis of Action — Substitution of Claim to Arbitrate under Treaty for Claim Based on General International Law.

State Responsibility — Prescription — Extinctive Prescription — Extent of Application of Principle — Absence of Rule Laying Down Time Limit — Allegations of Undue Delay — Relevance to Evidential Requirements.

Treaties — Interpretation of — Principles and Rules of — Interpretation of Expressions “Justice”, “Right” and “Equity” by Reference to Rules of Municipal Law of Signatory — Interpretation of Expression “Free Access to the Courts” — “Administration of Justice” Interpreted as Subject Matter Allied to “Commerce and Navigation” in Most-Favoured-Nation Treaty — Interpretation by Reference to Customs of Period of Signature of Treaty — Interpretation by Reference to Intention of the Parties

Treaties — Special Kinds of Treaties — Commercial Treaties — Most-Favoured-Nation Clause — Nature of — Power to Attract Only Matters of Same Category of Subject — “Administration of Justice” as Subject Allied to “Commerce and Navigation” — Inability to Incorporate in Treaty Provisions of International Law — Guarantee of “Justice”, “Right”, “Equity”, “ Free Access to the Courts” — Meaning of These Terms

Arbitration — Evidence — Rules of — Burden of Proof — Allegation of Denial of Justice — Need to Prove Existence of Remedies Not Used — Contention that Available Remedies Ineffective — Test of Assumption of Truth of Facts Claimed.

State Responsibility — For Breaches of Contractual Obligations — Allegation of Breach of Contract of Sale — Finding that No Binding Agreement Reached — Allegation of Delay in Presenting Claim — Prescription — Absence of Rule of International Law Laying Down Time Limit — Right of Claimant to Change Legal Basis of Action — Substitution of Claim to Arbitrate under Treaty for Claim Based on General International Law — Most-Favoured-Nation Clause — Nature of — Power to Attract Only Matters of Same Category of Subject — “Administration of Justice” as Subject Allied to “Commerce and Navigation” — Inability to Incorporate in Treaty Provisions of International Law — Interpretation of Treaty — Interpretation of Expressions “justice”, “right” and “equity” by Reference to Rules of Municipal Law of Signatory — Interpretation of Expression “free access to the courts” — What Constitutes Denial of Access — Defence of Non-exhaustion of Legal Remedies — Burden of Proof in Arbitration Proceedings — Need to Prove Existence of Remedies Not Used — Contention that Available Remedies Ineffective — Test of Assumption of Truth of Facts Claimed — Need for Exhausting Whole System of Legal Protection of Municipal Courts — Failure to Call Available Witness — Failure to Exhaust Appellate Rights — Failure to Put Forward Claim in Municipal Courts.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)