Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T02:07:06.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Ports: Privatization and the World's Ports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2007

Colin Davis
Colin Davis
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent controversy over a foreign-owned company running a US port brought attention to the creeping privatization of work in ports worldwide. Since the 1980s, there has been a head-long rush to privatize ports. The pace can be best described as rapid and chaotic. For some economists privatization is seen as a method to increase efficiency. But the process has substantial critics. For many privatization is perceived as problematic. There is evidence that the process does not indeed lead to savings and greater efficiency. Instead, the process has been haphazard and far from uniform in its application. Even where there is an entrenched presence, savings from privatization have yet to be realized. Others have made the point that the process cannot be transferred to ports in the developing world. That is, the multiplicity of ports and transportation problems in the interior make privatization more like wishful thinking than a policy that can work.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Labor and Working-Class History , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , Spring 2007 , pp. 154 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © The International Labor and Working-Class History Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Washington Post, March 9, 2006, A4.

2. Washington Post, March 9, 2006, B9.

3. “A New Deal for Ports: Multi-national operators show their hand,” Fairplay, June 13, 1996, 12.

4. Baird, Alfred J., “Privatization Trends at the World's Top-100 Container Ports,” Maritime Policy Management, 29:3 (1996): 271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Saundry, Richard and Turnbull, Peter, “Private Profit, Public Loss: The Financial and Economic Performance of UK Ports,” Maritime Policy and Management, 24:4 (1997): 319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Baird, Alfred J., “Privatization Trends at the World's Top-100 Container Ports,” Maritime Policy Management, 29:3 (1996): 271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tongzon, Jose and Heng, Wu, “Port Privatization, Efficiency and Competitiveness: Some Empirical Evidence from Container Ports (Terminals),” Transportation Research Part A (2005): 405–424Google Scholar; “Brittan, Samuel, “Privatization: A Comment on Kay and Thompson,” The Economic Journal 96 (March 1986): 33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bakr, Mohammed A., A Model in Privatization: Successful Change Management in the Ports of Saudi Arabia, (London, 2001)Google Scholar.

6. Iheduru, O.C., “Rethinking Maritime Privatization in Africa,” Maritime Policy and Management 20:1 (1993): 31–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hoffman, Jan, “Latin American Ports: Results and Determinants of Private Sector Participation,” International Journal of Maritime Economics, 3:3 (2001): 221–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Cullinane, Kevin and Song, Dong-Wook, “Port Privatization Policy and Practice,” Transport Reviews, 22:1 (2002), 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kay, J. and Thompson, D., “Privatization: A Policy in Search of a Rationale,” The Economic Journal 96 (March, 1986): 18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Everett, Sophia and Robinson, Ross, “Port Reform in Australia: Issues in the Ownership Debate,” Maritime Policy and Management, 25:1 (1998): 41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. Turnbull, Peter, Woolfson, Charles and Kelly, John, Dock Strike: Conflict and Restructuring in Britain's Ports (Aldershot, GB, 1992)Google Scholar; Cullunane & Song, “Port Privatization Policy,” Transport Review.

9. Davis, Colin J., Waterfront Revolts: New York and London Dockworkers, 1946–61 (Urbana, 2001)Google Scholar.

10. Neil Evans, et al., The Abolition of the Dock Labor Scheme, Research Series No. 14, September, 1993.

11. Jamieson, Alan, “Not More Ports, but Better Ports: The Development of British Ports Since 1945,” The Northern Mariner 6:1 (1996): 29–34Google Scholar.

12. Turnbull, Peter, “Docks,” in Pendleton, Andrew and Winterton, Jonathan, Public Enterprise in Transition: Industrial Relations in State and Privatized Corporations, (London, 1993), 186Google Scholar.

13. Turnbull, Peter, “The British Port Industry, Part 2 employment, working practices and productivity,” Maritime Policy and Management, 20:3 (1993): 181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Turnbull, Peter & Wass, Victoria, “The Greatest Game No More-Redundant Dockers and the Demise of ‘Dock Work,’” Work, Employment and Society 8:4 (1994): 487–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14. Saundry, Richard and Turnbull, Peter, “Melee on the Mersey: Contracts, Competition and Labor Relations on the Docks,” Industrial Relations Journal 27:4 (1996): 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15. Davis, Waterfront Revolts, 51.

16. Turnbull, Peter, “The Great Dock and Dole Swindle: Accounting for Costs and Benefits of Port Transport Deregulation and the Dock Labor Compensation Scheme,” Public Administration 73:4 (1995): 525CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Lavalette, Michael and Kennedy, Jane, Solidarity on the Waterfront: The Liverpool Lock Out of 1995/96, (Birkenhead, 1996), 41Google Scholar.

18. Davis, Waterfront Revolts, 109–141, 179–217.

19. Lavalette and Kennedy, Solidarity on the Waterfront, 53.

20. Castree, Noel, “Geographic Scale and Grass-Roots Internationalism: The Liverpool Dock Dispute, 1995–1998,” Economic Geography 76 (July, 2000): 282CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21. Hyman, Richard, “Imagined Solidarities: Can Trade Unions Resist Globalization?” in Globalization and Labor Relations, ed., Leisink, P. (Cheltenham, 1999)Google Scholar; Moody, Kim, “Towards an International Social-movement Unionism,” New Left Review 225 (1997): 52–72Google Scholar; Moody, Kim, Workers in a Lean World: Unions in the International Economy, (London, 1997)Google Scholar.

22. Kagan, Robert A., “How Much Does law Matter? Labor Law, Competition, and Waterfront Labor Relations in Rotterdam and U.S. Ports,” Law and Society Review 24:1 (1990): 35–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23. Noel Castree, “Geographic Scale and Grass-Roots Internationalism,” Economic Geography, 285.