Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T01:57:02.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization and Labor: Reflections on Contemporary Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2007

Eric Hershberg
Eric Hershberg
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As the editors note in their introduction to this special issue of the journal, for more than 500 years, indeed since the conquest, Latin-American economies and societies have been profoundly affected by developments in the world system. Over the past century alone, watershed moments such as the Great Depression of the 1930s and the oil shocks and international debt crisis of the 1970s and 80s, have rocked Latin-American economies, transforming development paradigms and with them the circumstances of the many millions who inhabit the region. Today, a quarter century has passed since Latin-American economies embarked, unevenly yet largely irreversibly, on the path of market-oriented reform. Designed to stimulate growth through insertion into global markets, structural adjustment programs swept Latin America in the wake of the debt crisis and were followed by a panoply of measures that sought an enduring restructuring of economies in the region. The pursuit of these so-called Washington Consensus policies did away with the inward-oriented strategies that had shaped development in the region throughout the postwar period. However reluctantly, Latin America staked its future on a renewed engagement with the world economy, and became a player in the highly contested processes of globalization that are reshaping societies and economies around much of the planet.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Labor and Working-Class History , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , Fall 2007 , pp. 164 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © The International Labor and Working-Class History Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. See Thomas Biersteker, “The ‘Triumph’ of Liberal Economic Ideas in the Developing World,” and Gereffi, Gary, “Global Production Systems and Third World Devlopment,” in Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development, ed. Stallings, Barbara (Cambridge, 1995)Google Scholar; Drake, Paul W., “The Hegemony of US Economic Ideas in Latin America,” in Turning the Tide? Latin America After Neoliberalism, ed. Hershberg, Eric and Rosen, Fred (New York, 2006)Google Scholar.

2. Stallings, Barbara and Peres, Wilson, Growth, Employment and Equity: The Impact of the Economic Reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean (Washington, 2000)Google Scholar.

3. Hoffman, Kelly and Centeno, Miguel Angel, “The Lopsided Continent: Inequality in Latin America,” Annual Review of Sociology 29 (2003): 363–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. Garreton, Manuel Antonio, et al. , Latin America in the 21st Century: Toward a New Sociopolitical Matrix (Miami, 2003)Google Scholar.

5. Portes, Alejandro (with Hoffman, Kelly), “Latin American Class Structures: Their Composition and Change during the Neoliberal Era,” Latin American Research Review 38:1 (February 2003): 41–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. Striffler, Steve, In the Shadows of State and Capital: The United Fruit Company, Popular Struggle, and Agrarian Restructuring in Ecuador, 1900–1995 (Durham, NC, 2003)Google Scholar.

7. Much has been made of the recent electoral triumphs of the left in Latin America, and in some countries leaders articulate a rhetoric that explicitly rejects “neoliberalism” and market-oriented reforms. In practice, however, no Latin-American countries, including Cuba, have sought to isolate themselves from global economic trends. Quite the contrary.

8. The approach outlined below reflects iterative exchanges of ideas with Juan Pablo Perez Sainz and Orlandina de Oliveira.

9. Stallings and Peres, Growth, Employment and Equity.

10. de la Garza Toledo, Enrique, Reestructuración productiva, mercado de trabajo y sindicatos en América Latina (Buenos Aires, 2000)Google Scholar.

11. Sainz, Juan Pablo Perez, Sarchi: Artesania y capital social (San Jose, Costa Rica, 1994)Google Scholar.

12. Scott Martin, “High End Production Complexes in Latin America,” Unpublished manuscript (2005).

13. Inter-American Development Bank, Good Jobs Wanted: Labor Markets in Latin America (Washington, 2004)Google Scholar.

14. Monge, Jorge, “Industrial Upgrading en el sector software en Costa Rica,” in Encadenamientos productivos y pequena empresa en Centroamerica (San Jose, Costa Rica, 2002)Google Scholar.

15. Rodrik, Dani, Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (Washington, 1997)Google Scholar.

16. Sainz, Juan Pablo Perez, “The New Faces of Informality in Central America,” Journal of Latin American Studies 30:1 (February 1998): 157–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Schmitz, Hubert, ed., Local Enterprises in the Global Economy: Issues of Governance and Upgrading (Northampton, MA, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. Ariza, Marina and de Oliveira, Orlandina, “Genero, trabajo y exclusion social en Mexico,” Estudios Demograficos y Urbanos 15:1 (enero-abril 2000): 11–33Google Scholar.

19. Segovia, Alexander, Transformacion estructural y reforma económica en El Salvador (Guatemala City, 2002)Google Scholar.

20. Doner, Richard and Hershberg, Eric, “Flexible Production and Political Decentralization: Elective Affinities in Pursuit of Competitiveness?” Studies in Comparative International Development 34: 1 (Spring 1999): 45–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21. Rueschmeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne and Stephens, John, Capitalist Development and Democracy (Chicago, 1992)Google Scholar.

22. Charles Tilly et al., “Scholarly Debate: Globalization Threatens Labor=s Rights,” in International Journal of Working Class History, Special Issue on “Global Flows of Capital and Labor,” 47 (Spring 1995).