Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T17:50:29.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting Russian Serfdom: Bonded Peasants and Market Dynamics, 1600s–1800s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2010

Alessandro Stanziani
Alessandro Stanziani
Affiliation:
École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The notion of the “second serfdom” has to be revisited. I claim that the introduction, the evolution, and the abolition of serfdom in Russia should be seen as a long-term process, beginning no later than the late sixteenth century and ending at the eve of the First World War. In particular, I show that serfdom was never officially institutionalized in Russia and that the rules usually evoked to justify this argument actually were not meant to “bind” the peasantry but to distinguish noble estate owners from state-service nobles and “bourgeois.” Contrary to what has been argued by Witold Kula and Immanuel Wallerstein, the rise of capitalism in the West did not exploit the rise of serfdom in the East, but both East and West were part of the same global wave of commercialization, protoindustrialization, and industrialization.

Type
Shifting Boundaries between Free and Unfree Labor
Information
International Labor and Working-Class History , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , Fall 2010 , pp. 12 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; Kula, Witold, An Economic Theory of the Feudal System (London, 1976)Google Scholar; North, Douglass, Structure and Change in Economic History (New York, 1981)Google Scholar.

2. Pomeranz, Kenneth, The Great Divergence (Princeton, NJ, 2000)Google Scholar.

3. The first critique and analysis of the invention of the expression “serf de la glèbe” was made by Bloch, Marc: “Serf de la glèbe. Histoire d'une expression toute faite,” Revue historique 36 (1921): 220–42Google Scholar. The classical definition of Russian serfdom can be found in Blum, Jerome, Lord and Peasant in Russia from the Ninth through the Nineteenth Century (New York, 1964)Google Scholar.

4. See Stanziani, Alessandro, “The Legal Status of Labour from the Seventeenth to the Nineteenth Century: Russia in a European Comparative Perspective,” International Review of Social History 54 (2009): 359–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Duchet, Michèle, Anthropologie et histoire au siècle des lumières (Paris, 1971)Google Scholar.

6. Wolff, Larry, Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment (Stanford, 1994)Google Scholar; Stanziani, Alessandro, “Free Labor-Forced Labor: An Uncertain Boundary? The Circulation of Economic Ideas between Russia and Europe from the Eighteenth to the Mid-nineteenth Century,” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 9 (2008): 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Bois, Guy, La crise du féodalisme (Paris, 1980)Google Scholar; Duby, Georges, Les trois ordres ou l'imaginaire du féodalisme (Paris, 1978)Google Scholar; Bonnassie, Pierre, From Slavery to Feudalism (Cambridge, MA, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Munro, John, “Crisis and Change in the Late Medieval English Economy,” Journal of Economic History 58 (1998): 215–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scott, Tom, ed., The Peasantries of Europe: From the Fourteenth to the Eighteenth Centuries (London, 1998)Google Scholar; Freedman, Paul and Bourin, Monique, eds., Forms of Servitude in Northern and Central Europe (Brepols, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. Bloch, Serf de la glèbe, 220–42.

9. North, Michael, From the North Sea to the Baltic: Essays in Commercial, Monetary and Agrarian History, 1500–1800 (Aldershot, 1996)Google Scholar; Melton, Edgar, “Population Structure, the Market Economy and the Transformation of Gutsherrschaft in East Central Europe, 1650-1800: The Cases of Brandenburg and Bohemia,” German History 16 (1998): 297–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hagen, William, Ordinary Prussians: Brandenburg Junkers and Villagers, 1500–1840 (Cambridge, MA, 2002)Google Scholar.

10. This argument runs from Hayek's The Road to Serfdom (Chicago, 1944) through Hellie's, Richard Slavery in Russia, 1450–1725 (Chicago, 1982)Google Scholar.

11. Crummey, Robert, “Sources of Boyar Power in the Seventeenth Century,” Cahiers du monde russe and soviétique 34 (1993): 107–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12. Fuller, William C., Strategy and Power in Russia, 1600–1914 (New York, 1992)Google Scholar; Leonard, Carol S., Reform and Regicide: The Reign of Peter III of Russia (Bloomington, IN, 1993)Google Scholar.

13. Moon, David, “Reassessing Russian Serfdom,” European History Quarterly 26 (1996): 483–526Google Scholar; Blum, Lord and Peasant in Russia; Hellie, Richard, Enserfment and Military Change in Muscovy (Chicago, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14. Moon, “Reassessing Russian Serfdom”; Zaionchkovskii, P. A., Otmena krepostnogo prava v Rossii [The abolition of serfdom in Russia], 3rd ed. (Moscow, 1968)Google Scholar.

15. Eaton, Henry, “Cadasters and Censuses of Muscovy,” Slavic Review 26 (1967): 54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar; the most complete list of published sixteenth and seventeenth cadastral records is in Voznesenskii, S. V., Materialy dlia bibliografii po istorii narodov SSSR XVI-XVIIvv [Materials for a bibliography on the history of the people of USSR, sixteenth-seventeenth centuries] (Leningrad, 1933)Google Scholar.

16. On peasant mobility, see Hellie, Enserfment, 142; Morrison, Daniel, Trading Peasants and Urbanization in Eighteenth Century Russia: The Central Industrial Region (New York and London, 1987)Google Scholar. Several examples of peasant mobility in Rossiiskoi Gosudarstvennyi Arkhivi Dreveneikh Aktov (RGADA: Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts), fond 294, opis' 2.

17. Moon, David, The Russian Peasantry, 1600-1930: The World the Peasants Made (London, 1996)Google Scholar.

18. Kabuzan, Valerii, Izmeneniia v razmeshchenii naseleniia Rossii v XVIII-pervoi polovine XIXe v. (po materialam revizii) [Changes in the Russian population during the eighteenth-first half of the nineteenth century, according to the census materials] (Moscow, 1970), 186–9Google Scholar.

19. Hellie, Enserfment, 144; Kamentseva, Elena I., “Usloviia zakreposhcheniia novoporiadchikov” [The conditions of enserfment of new settlers], Trudy moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo istoriko-arkhivnogo instituta 7 (1954): 129–54Google Scholar.

20. Hellie, Enserfment,108.

21. Moon, David, The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia, 1762–1907 (London, 2001)Google Scholar; Dennison, Tracy K., “Did Serfdom Matter? Russian Rural Society, 1750–1860,” Historical Research 79 (2003): 74–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Melton, Edgar, “Proto-industrialization, Serf Agriculture, and Agrarian Social Structure. Two Estates in Nineteenth Century Russia,” Past and Present 115 (1987): 73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Melton, Edgar, “Enlightened Seignorialism and its Dilemmas in Serf Russia, 1750–1830,” The Journal of Modern History, 62 (1990): 675–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hoch, Steven, Serfdom and Social Control in Russia: Petrovskoe, a Village in Tambov (Chicago, 1986)Google Scholar.

22. TsGIAM (Central State Moscow Archives), fond 54. See also Wirtschafter, Elise Kimerling, Structures of Society. Imperial Russia's “People of Various Ranks” (Dekalb, IL, 1994), 71–4Google Scholar.

23. Stanziani, Alessandro, “Serfs, Slaves, or Wage Earners? The Legal Statute of Labor in Russia from a Comparative Perspective, from the Sixteenth to the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Global History 3 (2008): 183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24. Wirtschafter, Elise Kimerling, Russia's Age of Serfdom, 1649–1861 (Blackwell, 2008)Google Scholar.

25. Samuel Becker, Nobility and Privilege in Late Imperial Russia (Dekalb, IL, 1985)Google Scholar; Dukes, Paul, Catherine the Great and the Russian Nobility (Cambridge, MA, 1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, Robert E., The Emancipation of the Russian Nobility, 1762–1785 (Princeton, NJ, 1973)Google Scholar; Lieven, David, The Aristocracy in Europe, 1815–1914 (London, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lincoln, W. Bruce, The Great Reforms: Autocracy, Bureaucracy and the Politics of Change in Imperial Russia (Dekalb, IL, 1990)Google Scholar; Pintner, Walter M., Russian Economic Policy under Nicholas I (Ithaca, NY, 1967)Google Scholar.

26. TsGIAM, fond 54 (Moskovskoe gubernskoe upravlenie), 1783–1917, opis' 1, for example: dela 56, 284, 966, 1509; Rossiskie Gosudarstvennoie Imperialskie Arkhivi (Russian Imperial Archives; RGIA), f. 1149, opis' 2 delo 20 and delo 44; Gosudarstvennie Arkhivi Rossiskoi Federatsii (State archives of the Russian Federation; GARF), fond 109 opis' 3, delo 1885.

27. RGIA, f. 1149, op. 2, delo 90. See also Wirtschafter, Structures, 84.

28. Confino, Michael, Domaines et seigneurs en Russie vers la fin du XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1963)Google Scholar; Melton, “Enlightened.”

On the broader European concerns about supervision and labor organization in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and the mutual influences on this topic between Russia and Britain, see Stanziani, Alessandro, “The Traveling Panopticon: Labor Institutions and Labor Practices in Russia and Britain in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 51 (2009): 715–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29. Confino, Domaines; Bush, Michael, ed., Serfdom and Slavery: Studies in Legal Bondage (Manchester, NY, 1996)Google Scholar.

30. Confino, Domaines, 44.

31. Among the others: Melton, “Enlightened”: 702-4; Rodney Bohac, “Everyday Forms of Resistance: Serf Opposition to Gentry Exactions, 1800–1861,” in Peasant Economy, Culture and Politics of European Russia, 1800–1921, ed. Kingston-Mann, Esther and Mixter, Timothy (Princeton, NJ, 1991), 230–60Google Scholar; Hoch, Serfdom.

32. Zaionchkovskii, Petr A., Otmena krepostnogo prava v Rossii, 3rd ed. (Moscow, 1968)Google Scholar. English translation, The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia (Academic International Press, 1978).

33. Confino, Domaines.

34. Blum, Lords; Gerschenkron, Alexander, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, MA, 1962)Google Scholar; Crisp, Olga, Studies in Russian Economy before 1914 (Basingstoke, 1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bartlett, Roger, “Serfdom and State Power in Imperial Russia,” European History Quarterly 33 (2003): 29–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35. Bonnassie, Pierre, From Slavery to Feudalism (Cambridge, MA, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Genicot, Louis, Rural Communities in the Medieval West (Baltimore, 1991)Google Scholar; Duby, Georges, Les trois ordres ou l'imaginaire du féodalisme (Paris, 1978)Google Scholar; Scott, Tom, ed., The Peasantries of Europe: From the Fourteenth to the Eighteenth Centuries (London, 1998)Google Scholar.

36. Brenner, Robert, “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Preindustrial Europe,” Past and Present 70 (1976): 30–74Google Scholar; Aston, T. and Philpin, Charles, The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Preindustrial Europe (Cambridge, MA, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hagen, Ordinary Prussians.

37. Blanchard, Ian, Russia's Age of Silver: Precious Metal Production and Economic Growth in the Eighteenth Century (New York, 1989)Google Scholar; Dennison, “Did Serfdom Matter? 74–89.

38. Hoch, Serfdom.

39. Semevskii, Vasilii I., Krest'ianskii vopros v Rossii v XVIII i pervoi polovine XIX veka [The peasant question in Russia in the eighteenth to the first half of the nineteenth century], 2 Vols. (St. Petersburg, 1888)Google Scholar; idem, Krest'iane v tsarstvovanie Imperatritsy Ekateriny II [The peasantry under the reign of Catherine II], Vol. 1, 2nd ed. (1881; St. Petersburg, 1903), Vol. 2 (St. Petersburg, 1901); Koval'chenko, Ivan D., Russkoe krepostnoe krest'ianstvo v pervoi polovine XIXth v. [The Russian serf peasantry during the first half of the nineteenth century] (Moscow, 1967)Google Scholar.

40. Koval'chenko, Russkoe.

41. Mironov, Boris, The Social History of Russian Empire, 2 Vols. (Boulder, CO, 1999)Google Scholar.

42. Ibid.

43. Mironov, Boris and Leonard, Carol S., “In Search of Hidden Information: Some Issues in the Socio-Economic History of Russia in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries,” Social Science History 9 (Autumn 1985): 339–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mironov, Boris, Vnytrennii rynok Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVIII -pervoi po lovine XIX v. [The domestic market in Russia during the second half of the eighteenth-first half of the nineteenth century] (Leningrad, 1981)Google Scholar.

44. Mironov, Vnutrennyi rynok: 153–4.

45. Koval'chenko, Russkoe.

46. Gestwa, Klaus, Protoindustrialisierung in Russland (Göttingen, 1999)Google Scholar; Serbina, Katerina N., Krest'ianskaia zhelezodelatel'naia promyshlennost' tsentral'noi Rossii XVI-pervoi poloviny XIXe vekoi [The peasant metallurgic home-industry in Central Russia, sixteenth-first half of the nineteenth century] (Leningrad, 1978)Google Scholar. For the Demydov estate in Tula: RGADA, fonds 271, delo 1061.

47. Confino, Domaines; Mironov, Social History; Tatiana F. Izmen'eva, Rossiia v sisteme evropeiskogo rynka. Konets XIXe-nachalo XX v. [Russia in the system of the European market. End of the nineteenth-early twentieth century] (Moscow, 1991).

48. Mironov, Social History; Sergei Strumilin, Ocherki ekonomicheskoi istorii Rossii i SSSR [Studies in the economic history of Russia and the USSR] (Moscow, 1966): 330–33; RGADA, fond 199 (G. F. Miller); Emilia I. Indova, “O rossiskikh manufakturakh vtoroi poloviny XVIII v.” [On the Russian manufactures during the second half of the eighteenth century], Istoricheskaia geografiia Rossii: XIX-nachalo XX v. (Moscow, 1975): 248–345; Indova, Emilia I., Dvortsovoe khoziaistvo v Rossii [The palace economy in Russia] (Moscow, 1964)Google Scholar.

49. Mironov, Boris, “Consequences of the Price Revolution in Eighteenth-Century Russia,” The Economic History Review 45 (1992): 457–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50. Mironov, “Consequences,” 465.

51. On serfs-entrepreneurs see Robert Rudolph, “Agricultural Structure and Proto-industrialization in Russia: Economic Development with Unfree Labour,” The Journal of Economic History 45 (1985): 47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Prokov'eva, Lidia S., Krest'ianskaia obshchina v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVIII-pervoi polovine XIX v [The peasant commune in Russia during the second half of the eighteenth-first half of the nineteenth centuries] (Leningrad, 1981)Google Scholar; Tikhonov, Iurii A., Pomeshchic'i krest'iane v Rossi: feodal'naia renta v XVII-nachale XVIII v [The private estates' peasants in Russia: the feudal rent in the seventeenth—early eighteenth centuries] (Moscow, 1974)Google Scholar. On the urban activity of private peasants I have utilized the following archives: RGADA, fond 294, opis’ 2 and 3; fond 1287, opis’ 3. TsGIAM, opis 2, dela 31, 40, 82, 124, 146; RGADA, fond 210: razriadnyi prikaz; fond 248 senat I senatskie uchrezhdeniia; fond 350: revizkie skazki po nizhegorodskoi gubernii, opis’ 2, dela 1975 and 2056; fonds 615, krepostnye knigi, dela 526, 528, 529, 4753, 6654; fond 1209 (pomestnyi prikaz), opis’ 1, delo 292; fonds 1287 (sheremetev), opis’ 5 and 6; RGIA, fonds 1088 (Sheremetev, opis’ 3, 5, 10). See also Gestwa, Klaus, Proto-industrialisierung in Russland, vandenhoeck und ruprecht (Göttingen, 1999)Google Scholar. Serbina, K.N., Krest'ianskaia zhelezodelatel'naia promyshlennost’ tsentral'noi rossii XVI-pervoi poloviny XIXe vekoi [The peasant metallurgical industry in central Russia from the sixteenth to the first half of the nineteenth centuries] (Leningrad, Nauka, 1978)Google Scholar.

52. Serbina, Krest'ianskaia, 37.

53. Dennison, “Did Serfdom Matter?”

54. Edgar Melton, “Proto-Industrialization,” 69–106.

55. RGIA, fonds 1088, opis' 10, dela 616 and 618.

56. Ibid.

57. RGIA, fonds 1088, opis' 10, delo 611.

58. Sheremetev published instruktsiia in 1802 and 1832. RGIA, fonds 1088, opis' 10, delo 607: in Serbina, 97–8; in Kashin, Boris N., Kres'ianskaia promyshlennost' [The peasant rural industry], 2 Vols. (Moscow and Leningrad, 1935)Google Scholar, tom 1, 228–9.

59. Rudolph, Robert, “Agricultural Structure and Proto-Industrialization in Russia: Economic Development with Unfree Labor,” The Journal of Economic History 45 (1985): 47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60. Melton, “Enlightened.”

61. Serbina, Krest'ianaskaia: 100–1; Gestwa, Proto-industrialisierung.

62. Serbina, Krest'ianaskaia, 108; RGIA, fonds 1088, opis' 10, delo 524; Kashin, Vol. I: 215, 347–49.

63. Melton, “Proto-industrialization,” 73–81; Domar, Evsey and Machina, Mark, “On the Profitability of Russian Serfdom,” The Journal of Economic History 44 (1984): 919–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64. Harnisch, Hartmut, “Bäuerliche Ökonomie und Mentalität unter den Bedingungen der ostelbischen Gutsherrschaft in den letzen Jahrzehnten vor Beginn der Agrarreformen,” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 24 (1989): 87–108Google Scholar.

65. Hagen, Ordinary.

66. Frost, Robert, “The Nobility of Poland-Lithuania, 1569–1795,” in The European Nobilities in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. Scott, Hamish, Vol. II, Northern, Central and Eastern Europe (London, 1994)Google Scholar; Melton, “Population Structure.”

67. Melton, “Population Structure.”

68. Dennison, Tracy and Ogilvie, Sheilagh, “Serfdom and Social Capital in Bohemia and Russia,” Economic History Review 60 (2007): 513–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69. Vries, Jan de, European Urbanization, 1500–1800 (London, 1984)Google Scholar.