Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T05:26:16.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The susceptibility to malathion of Metopolophium dirhodum on two wheat species at two growth stages, and the effect of plant growth regulators on this susceptibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

P. K. Attah*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AS, UK
H. F. van Emden
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AS, UK
*
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access

Abstract

Malathion tolerance of the rose-grain aphid Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker) reared on the ancient wheat variety Emmer (Triticum dicoccum L.) was tested by topical bioassay and found to be lower than that of aphids reared on the modern more susceptible variety Marts Kinsman (T. aestivum L.). On both varieties, tolerance was greater at stem elongation than at the tillering stage of plant growth. All statistically significant differences when plants were treated with Cycocel and MCPA showed that the two chemicals, respectively, reduced and increased aphid tolerance to malathion, in keeping with the effects of the chemicals on induced plant resistance to aphids reported in the literature. Probit mortality slopes were not progressively altered by changes in LC50, so that similar differences in aphid tolerance to malathion were found at both LC59 and LC90 levels.

Résumé

La tolérance au malathion du puceron Metopholophium dirhodum (Walker) éievé sur l'espece ancien “Emmer” (Triticum dicoccum L.) est apparue inférieure à celle des pucerons élvés sur l'espèce moderne, plus sensible “Marls Kinsman” (T. aestivum L.). Sur les deux espèces, la tolérance a été plus importante au stade élongation de l'entre-noeud qu' à celui de tallage. Toutes différences statistiquement significatives, avec des plantes préalablement traitées avec Cycocel et MCPA, ont montré que les deux composés ont, respectivement, reduit et accentué la tolérance du puceron au malathion, conformément aux réultats réportes dans la litérature avec des composés utilisés sur la sensibilité aux pucerons des plantes traitées. Le taux de mortalité n'a pas montré un changement progressif en fonction de LC50, si Men que des résultats similaires concemant la tolérance des pucerons au malathion ont été trouvés aux deux niveaux LC50 et LC50.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carter, N., Dixon, A. F. G. and Rabbinge, R. (1982) Cereal Aphid Populations: Biology, Simulation and Prediction. Pudoc Publications, Wageningen.Google Scholar
El-Amin, E. H. (1975) Studies on the ecology of aphids on spring cereals and maize. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1971) Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hintz, S. D. and Schulz, J. T. (1969) The effect of selected herbicides on cereal aphids under greenhouse conditions. Proc. N. Centr. Brch. Entomol. Soc. Am. 24, 114117.Google Scholar
Lowe, H. J. B. (1974) Effects of Metopolophium dirhodum on spring wheat in the glasshouse. Plant Pathol. 23, 136140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamad, B. M. and van Emden, H. F. (1989) Host plant modification to insecticide susceptibility in Myzus persicae (Sulz.). Insect Set. Applic. 10, 699703.Google Scholar
Potter, C., and Gillham, E. M. (1957) Effect of host plant on the resistance of Acyrtosiphon pisum (Harris) to insecticides. Bull. Entomol. Res. 48, 317322.Google Scholar
Raman, K. V. (1977) Studies on host plant resistance of cowpeas to leafhoppers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Rautapää, J. (1972) Effects of herbicides and chlormequat chloride on host plant selection and population growth of Macrosiphum avenae (F.) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Ann. Agric. Fenn. 11, 135140.Google Scholar
Ries, S. K. (1976) Subtoxic effects on plants. In Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology (Edited by Audus, L. J.), Vol. 2, pp. 313344. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Sawicki, R. M. and Rice, A. D. (1978) Response of susceptible and resistant peach potato aphids Myzus persicae (Sulz.) to insecticides in leaf-dip bknssays. Pestic. Sci. 9, 513516.Google Scholar
Selander, J., Marldcula, M. and Tiittanen, K. (1972) Resistance of the aphids, Myzus persicae (Sulz.), Aulacorthwn solani (Kalt) and Aphis gossypii Glov. to insecticides and the influence of host plantonmisresistance. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 11, 141145.Google Scholar
Sotherton, N. W. and van Emden, H. F. (1982) Laboratory assessments of resistance to theaphids Sitobion avenae and Metopolophium dirhodum in three Triticum species and two modern wheat cultivars. Ann. Appl. Biol. 101, 99107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tottman, D. R., Makepeace, R. J. and Broad, H. (1979) An explanation of the decimal code for the growth stages of cereals with illustrations. Ann. Appl. Biol. 93, 221234.Google Scholar
van Emden, H. F. (1964) Effect of (2-chloroethyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride on the rate of increase of the cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae L. Nature, Lond. 201, 946948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, A. D. (1979) Life history strategies of cereal aphids. Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Watt, A. D. and Dixon, A. F. G. (1981) The role of cereal growth stages and crowding in the induction of alatae in Sitobion avenae and its consequences forpopulation growth. Ecol. Entomol. 6, 441447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar