Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T03:41:07.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oviposition behaviour of Heliothis armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in relation to the day-night cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Ashok K. Singh  and
Heinz Rembold
Ashok K. Singh
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute for Biochemistry, D-8033 Martinsried near Munich, Federal Republic of Germany
Heinz Rembold
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute for Biochemistry, D-8033 Martinsried near Munich, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access

Abstract

Oviposition behaviour of the cotton bollworm, Heliothis armigera, and its relation to day-night cycle was examined under laboratory conditions. Eggs were laid both in large quantities of clumped eggs at one place, and singly distributed in the oviposition cage, always glued on the substrate. The maximum individual life time fecundity recorded was 3080, and the highest number of eggs delivered in 1 day was 949. The mean pre-oviposition period was 2.9 days. Peak fecundity occurred between days 5–9 and the highest mating frequency from days 4–6 after emergence. Maximum age for egg laying was 29 days, average life expectancy was 22 days, with longest individual survival of 32 days. Male longevity did not vary from that of females. There was a significant difference in the longevity of mated and virgin females; the mated females lived for a shorter time but produced a significantly higher number of eggs. Also, mating induced a sudden surge in oviposition. Almost 90% of the total eggs were laid in the darkness. Out of them, 60% were from the first and 30% from the second half of the dark period.

Résumé

Ce travail a pour objet d'étudier, dans les élevages au laboratoire, le comportement d'oviposition de la chenille des épis du mais (Heliothis armigera) en général ainsi que la relation de ce comportement avec le rythme de lumière et obscurité. On a observé que les femelles pondent soit en forme d'une seule couvée comprenant un grand nombre d'oeufs entassés, soit en forme d'oeufs isolés, dispersés dans la cage d'oviposition et bien collés sur le substrat. Nous rapportons un maximum de fécondité individuelle s'élevant à 3080 oeufs la vie durant, tandis qu'un maximum de 949 oeufs fut obtenu d'une femelle dans une seule journée. En moyenne, la période précédant l'oviposition s'élève à 2.9 jours. Compté après l'éclosion, le maximum de la fécondité se présente entre jours 5 et jour 9, et le plus grand nombre d'accouplements s'effectue entre jour 4 et jour 6. En ce qui concerne la capacité de pondre, on a trouvé une limite d'âge de 29 jours; l'expectance de vie des animaux s'élève en moyenne à 22 jours, et un total de 32 jours représente la plus longue survie individuelle qu'on vient d'obsever. La longévité des mâles ne diffère point de celle des femelles, tandis qu'une différence significative exsite entre les femelles inséminées et les femelles vierges. L'insémination des femelles entraîne et une survie moins longue et la ponte d'un plus grand nombre d'oeufs. En outre, il parait que l'insémination provoque la ponte, dont l'activité augmente immédiatement après l'accouplement. Une relation bien définie entre l'oviposition et le rythme jounuit a été démontré. 90% de tous les oeufs ont été pondus au cours de la nuit: 60% de ce nombre pendant la première et 30% pendant la deuxième moitié de la période obscure.

Keywords

Day-night cycleHeliothis armigeraLepidopteraNoctuidaeovipositionRythme diurneHeliothis armigeraLepidopteraNoctuidaeoviposition
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 393 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnault, C. and Loevenbruck, C. (1986) Influence of host plant and larval diet on ovarian productivity in Acrolepiopsis assectella (Lepidoptera; Acrolepiidae). Experientia 42, 448–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, C.H. (1981) The influence of light cycle and circadian rhythm on oviposition in five pyralid moth pests of stored products. Physiol. Entomol. 6, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, P.S. (1957) Oviposition response of the corn earworm to differences in surface texture. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 30, 59–63.Google Scholar
Callahan, P.S. (1958) Behaviour of the imago of the corn earworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie), with special reference to emergence and reproduction. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 51, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coaker, T.H. (1959) Investigations on Heliothis armigera (Hb.) in Uganda. Bull. Entomol. Res. 50, 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhandapani, N. and Balasubramanian, M. (1980) Effect of different food plants on the development and reproduction of Heliothis armigera (Hbn.) Experientia 36, 930–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. and Raven, P.H. (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellington, J.J. and El-Sokkari, A. (1986) A measure of the fecundity, ovipositional behaviour, and mortality of the bollworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie) in the laboratory. The Southwest. Entomol. 11, 177–193.Google Scholar
Farrow, R.A. and Daly, J.C. (1987) Long-range movements as an adaptive strategy in the genus Heliothis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): A review of its occurrence and detection in four pest species. Aus. J. Zool. 35, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P.D. and Thorsteinson, A.J. (1960) Food plant relationships of the diamond-back moth (Plutella maculipennis (Curt.)).II Sensory regulation of oviposition of the adult female. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 3, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagley, E. A. C., Bronskill, J.F. and Ford, E.J. (1980) Effect of the physical nature of leaf and fruit surfaces on oviposition by the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Entomol. 112, 503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, D.F. (1965) The corn earworm complex. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 40, 1–247.Google Scholar
Hough, J.A. and Pimentel, D. (1978) Influence of host foliage on development, survival, and fecundity of gypsy moth. Environ. Entomol. 7, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilse, D. (1937) New observations on responses to colours in egg laying butterflies. Nature 140, 544–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D.M., Severson, R.F., Johnson, A.W., Chaplin, J.F. and Stephenson, G.M. (1984) Ovipositional response of tobacco budworm months (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to cuticular chemical isolates from green tobacco leaves. Environ. Entomol. 13, 1023–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kou, R. and Chow, Y. (1987) Emergence time and mating-related behaviour of the cotton bollworm, Heliothis armigera (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) in reverse photoperiod. Bull. Inst. Zool., Acad. Sin. 26, 176–186.Google Scholar
Kravchenko, V.D. (1981) Night activity of the Helicoverpa armigera butterflies. Zool. Z. 60, 1640–1644.Google Scholar
Kumar, H. and Saxena, K.N. (1985) Oviposition by Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in relation to its mating, diurnal cycle and certain non plant surfaces. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 20, 218–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lum, P. T. M. and Flaherty, B.R. (1969) Effect of mating with males reared in continuous light or in light-dark cycles on fecundity in Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 5, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lum, P. T. M. and Flaherty, B.R. (1970) Regulating oviposition by Plodia interpunctella (Hbn) in the laboratory by light and dark conditions. J. Econ. Entomol. 63, 236–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.R. and Strickler, K.L. (1984) Finding and accepting host plants. In Chemical Ecology of Insects (Edited by Bell, W.J. and Carde, R.T.), Chapman and Hall Publ., London, pp. 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajni, H.R. and Gill, K.M. (1974) Effect of light on the pests of stored products. Bull. Grain Tech. 12, 151–153.Google Scholar
Pedgley, D.E. (1985) Windborne migration of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to the British Isles Entomol. Gaz. 36, 15–21.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. and Owens, E.D. (1983) Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 28, 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausher, M.D. (1978) Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200, 1071–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, W. (1965) Heliothis armigera (Hbn.) (Noctuidae) in Western Tanganyika. I. Biology with special reference to the pupal stage. Bull. Entomol. Res. 50, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rembold, H. and Tober, H. (1985) Kairomones as pigeonpea resistance factors against Heliothis armigera. Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 249–252.Google Scholar
Renwick, J. A. A. and Radke, C.D. (1983) Chemical recognition of host plants for oviposition by the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Environ. Entomol. 12, 446–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S.H., Wolfenbarger, D.A. and Dilday, R.H. (1980) Antixenosis of smooth leaf cotton Gossypium spp. to the ovipositional response of tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens. Crop Science 20, 646–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salama, H.S., Rizk, A.F. and Sharaby, A. (1984) Chemical stimuli in flower and leaves of cotton that affect behaviour in the cotton moth, Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomol. Gener. 10, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, K.N. (1969) Patterns of insect-plant relationships determining susceptibility or resistance of different plants to an insect. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 12, 751–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, M.A., Parks, D.R. and Ehrlich, P.R. (1974) Plant resources and butterfly habitat selection. Ecology 55, 870–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H.H. (1974) Environmental and physiological control of insect sex pheromone behaviour. In Pheromones (Edited by Birch, M.C.) North Holland Publ. Comp., Amsterdam, pp. 62–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Shorey, H.H., McFarland, S.U. and Gaston, L.K. (1968a) Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XIII. Changes in pheromone quantity, as related to reproductive age and mating history, in females of seven species of Noctuidae (Lepidoptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61, 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H.H., Morin, K.L. and Gaston, L.K. (1968b) Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XV. Timing of development of pheromone-responsiveness and other indicators of reproductive age in males of eight species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61, 857–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, A.K. and Rembold, H. (1988) Developmental value of chickpea, Cicer arietinum, soybean, Glycine max, and maize, Zea mays flour for Heliothis armigera (Lep., Noctuidae) larvae. J. Appl. Entomol. 106, 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1971) Statistical Methods. State Univ. Press, Iowa.Google Scholar
Städler, E. (1974) Host plant stimuli affecting oviposition behaviour of the eastern spruce budworm. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17, 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Städler, E. (1978) Chemoreception of host plant chemicals by ovipositing females of Delia (Hylemya) brassicae. Ent. Exp. Appl. 24, 711–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, R.W. (1970) Copulation and oviposition behaviour of Ephestia cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 6, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbrecht, R.A. (1964) Die Abhängigkeit der Lockwirkung des Sexualduftorgans weiblicher Seidenspinner (Bombyx mori) von Alter und Kopulation. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 48, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topper, C.P. (1987) Nocturnal behaviour of adults of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Sudan Gezira and pest control implications. Bull. Entomol. Res. 77, 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, C. and Ahrberg, C. (1978) Host plants, nectar source plants and habitat selection of males and females of Anthocharis cardamines (Lepidoptera). Oikos 31, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, R.T. and Fraenkel, G.S. (1960) The specificity of the tobacco hornworm, Protoparce sexta (Johan.) to solanaceous plants. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 53, 503–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar