Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T14:45:15.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Insect behaviour and host plant resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

C. W. Baliddawa
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
Get access

Abstract

This paper discusses insect behaviour and host plant resistance under single-plant species resistance and plant population resistance. Under single-plant species resistance, the effects of repellents, surface texture, shape and colour to insect behaviour are briefly reviewed and discussed. The effects of plant species diversity and plant density on insect behaviour are discussed under plant population resistance. Where possible, this discussion is illustrated with examples from recent behavioural studies on the weevil, Sitona lineatus L.

Résumé

Cet article discute du comportement de l'insecte et de la résistance de la plante hôte au point de vue des espèces de plantes individuelles et du point de vue de la résistance d'une population de plantes. Dans le cas de la résistance des plantes individuelles, les effects des répulsifs, la texture de la surface, la forme et la couleur sur le comportement de l'insecte sont brievement analysés et discutés. Les effects de la diversité des espèces de plantes et la densité des plantes sur le comportement des insectes sont discutés du point de vue de la résistance de la population des plantes. Dans la mesure du possible, cette discussion est illustrée avec des examples tirés des études receutes du comportement du charançon, Sitona lineatus L.

Type
Section III: Insect behaviour and host plant resistance
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, E. C. (1980) Effects of plant diversity and time of colonization on an herbivore-plant interaction. Oecologia, Berl. 44, 319326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baliddawa, C. W. (1973) Plant resistance to the sorghum shootfly (Atherigona spp.) in some sorghum varieties and interaction with chemical treatments. M.Sc. (Agric.) thesis, Makerere University, Kampala.Google Scholar
Baliddawa, C. W. (1983) Some effects of crop diversity on the weevil Sitona lineatus L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Baliddawa, C. W. (1984) Movement and feeding activity of adult pea leaf weevil, Sitona lineatus L. in an oatbroadbean diculture. Insect Sci. Applic. 5, 3341.Google Scholar
Beck, S. D. and Reese, J. C. (1976) Insect-plant interactions: nutrition and metabolism. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 10, 4192.Google Scholar
Feeny, P. (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 10, 139.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. W. and Pickett, J. A. (1983) Wild potato repels aphids by release of aphid alarm pheromone. Nature 302, 608609.Google Scholar
Hendry, L. B., Kostele, J. C., Hindewlang, D. M., Wichmann, J. K., Fix, C. J. and Korzeniowski, S. H. (1976) Chemical messengers in insects and plants. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 10, 351384.Google Scholar
Kareiva, P. M. (1982) Experimental and mathematical analyses of herbivore movement: quantifying the influence of plant spacing and quality on foraging discrimination. Ecol. Monogr. 52, 261282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. (1977) Olfactory responses to distant plants and other odour sources In Chemical Control of Insect Behaviour (Edited by Shorey, H. H. and McKelvey, J. J. Jr). Wiley, London.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S., Booth, C. O. and Kershaw, W. J. S. (1961) Host finding by aphids in the field. III. Visual attraction. Ann. appl. Biol. 49, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, J. D. and Baliddawa, C. W. (1983) Factors affecting pest occurrence in various cropping systems. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 5964.Google Scholar
Painter, R. H. (1951) Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. and Owen, E. D. (1983) Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. A. Rev. Ent. 28, 337364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risch, S. J. (1981) Insect herbivore abundance in tropical monocultures and polycultures: an experimental test of two hypotheses. Ecology 62, 13251340.Google Scholar
Risch, S. J. and Andow, D. (1982) Insect movements and intercropping: An explanation for lower pest population in polycultures. Cyclostyled. Section of Ecology and Systematics, Division of Biological Sciences, Longmuir Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, E. and Levin, A. D. (1976) Biochemical parallelisms of repellents and attractants in higher plants and arthropods. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 10, 214260.Google Scholar
Root, R. B. (1973) Organisation of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol. Monogr. 43, 95124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoonhoven, L. M. (1972) Secondary plant substances and insects. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 5, 197224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. G. (1976) Influence of crop background on aphids and other phytophagous insects on brussels sprout. Ann. appl. Biol. 83, 113.Google Scholar
Stinner, R. E., Stimac, J. L., Barfield, C. S. and Dohse, L. (1983) Dispersal and movement of insect pests. A. Rev. Ent. 28, 319335.Google Scholar
Taksdal, G. and Baliddawa, C. W. (1975) Studies of the biology of sorghum shootflies Atherigona spp. (Muscidae: Diptera) and shootfly sorghum host plant relationships. Z. angew. Ent. 79, 239249.Google Scholar
Tirrel, R. (1970) Not many pests in my patch. Org. Garden Farmg 17, 6063.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (1979) Optimal foraging: a case for random movement. Oecologia 43, 261267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed