Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:48:17.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour of Anastrepha ludens, A. obliqua and A. serpentina (Diptera:Tephritidae) on a wild mango tree (Mangifera indica) harbouring three McPhail traps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Martin Aluja ,
Mario Cabrera ,
Jorge Guillen ,
Hilario Celedonio  and
Feliciano Ayora
Martin Aluja
Affiliation:
Vicente Garcia Torres #93, Coyoacan, 04000 Mexico D.F., Mexico City, Mexico
Mario Cabrera
Affiliation:
Programa MoscaMed, DGSVPF, Apdo. Postal 576, 30700 Tapachula Chiapas, Mexico
Jorge Guillen
Affiliation:
Programa MoscaMed, DGSVPF, Apdo. Postal 576, 30700 Tapachula Chiapas, Mexico
Hilario Celedonio
Affiliation:
Programa MoscaMed, DGSVPF, Apdo. Postal 576, 30700 Tapachula Chiapas, Mexico
Feliciano Ayora
Affiliation:
Programa MoscaMed, DGSVPF, Apdo. Postal 576, 30700 Tapachula Chiapas, Mexico
Get access

Abstract

We studied the behaviour of three Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) that were attracted to protein hydrolysate in glass McPhail traps, hung on an 8 m tall wild mango tree, Mangifera indica at three different heights. Out of 665 flies that landed on the exterior of the trap only 31 % were caught. Females represented 60.2 % of all flies trapped. The intermediate trap hung at 5m caught the most flies (57.5%). We observed a great deal of feeding activity (on trap, leaves, branches and fruit) including régurgitation and reingestion of liquid food droplets. When not on the trap surface, flies were more commonly seen on leaves than on branches and fruits. Inter- and intraspecific encounters between all Anastrepha spp. and both sexes were commonly recorded. Males were observed calling alone or in leks. All leks were formed on leaves and on two occasions included individuals of two species. Our observations suggested that the McPhail traps attracted different Anastrepha spp. with varying degrees of intensity.

Résumé

On a étudié le comportement de trois espèces d'Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) attirés aux pièges McPhail en verre qui contenaient de l'hydrolysate de protéine. Les pièges avaient été suspendus à trois hauteurs différentes sur un manguier sauvage (Mangi/era indica) de 8 mètres de haut. Des 665 anastrèphes qui ont atterri sur l'extérieur des pièges, 31 % seulement ont été pris, dont 60.2% femelles. Le deuxième piège, à 5 metres de haut, en a attrapé la plupart (57.5 %). On a observé beaucoup d'activités alimentaires (sur le piège, les feuilles, les branches, et on les fruits), y compris la régurgitation et la réingestion de guottelettes liquidques. Quand ils n'étaient pas sur le piège même, les anastrèphes se tenaient plus souvent sur les feuilles que sur les branches ou les fruits. Des rencontres intra- et interspécifiques entre toutes les especes at les deux sexes ont été souvent observées. L'appel sexuel provenant soit des mâles seuls soit en lek. Tous les leks se sont formés sur des feuilles; cependant on a pu observé en deux occasions des individus des deux espèces. Nos observations suggèrent que les pièges McPhail ont exercé sur les anastrèphes une attraction dont l'intensité varie d'espèce en espèce.

Keywords

AnastrephaTephritidaebehaviourMcPhail traplekhydrolized protein
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 309 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aluja (1985) Manejo Integrado de Las Moscas de la Fruta (Diptera: Tephritidae). Programa Mosca del Mediterraneo, DGSV-SARH, Mexico D. F. Mexico.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Hendrichs, J. and Cabrera, M. (1983) Behavior and interactions between Anastrepha ludens and A. obliqua on a field caged mango tree. I. Lekking behaviour and male territoriality. In Fruit Flies of Economic Importance (Edited by Cavalloro, R.) pp. 122–133. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Aluja, M. and Liedo, P. (1986) Future perspectives on integrated management of fruit flies in Mexico. In Pest Control: Operations and Systems Analysis (Edited by Mangel, M.), pp. 12–48. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Cabrera, M., Rios, E., Guillen, J., De La Rosa, G., Hendrichs, J. and Liedo, P. (1987a) A survey of the economically important fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) present in Chiapas, Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 70, 320–329.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Guillen, J., De La Rosa, G., Cabrera, M., Celedonio, H., Liedo, P. and Hendrichs, J. (1987b) Natural host plant survey of the economically important fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of Chiapas, Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 70, 329–338.Google Scholar
Balock, J.W. and Lopez, D.F. (1969) Trapping for control of the Mexican fruit fly in mango and citrus groves. J. econ. Entomol. 62, 53–56.Google Scholar
Bateman, M.A. and Morton, T.C. (1981) The importance of ammonia in proteinaceous attractants for fruit flies (Family: Tephritidae). Australian J. Agric Res. 32, 883–903.Google Scholar
Bradbury, J.W. (1977) Lek mating behaviour in the hammer-headed bat. Z. Tierpsychol. 45, 225–255.Google Scholar
Burditt, A.K. (1982) Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae) McPhail traps for survey and detection. Fla. Entomol. 65, 367–373.Google Scholar
Burk, T. (1983) Behavioral ecology of mating in the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla. Entomol. 66, 330–344.Google Scholar
Calkins, C.O., Schroeder, W.J. and Chambers, D.L. (1984) Probability of detecting Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae), populations with McPhail traps. J. econ. Entomol. 77, 198–201.Google Scholar
Coleman, R.E. and Gerhardt, R.R. (1988) Effect of temperature, relative humidity and amount and concentration of trypticase soy broth on regurgitation by female face flies (Diptera: Muscidae). Environ. Entomol. 17, 448–451.Google Scholar
Cunningham, R.T., Nakagawa, S., Suda, D.Y. and Urago, T. (1978) Tephritid fruit fly trapping: Liquid food baits in high and low rainfall climates. J. econ. Entomol. 71, 762–763.Google Scholar
Davis, J.C., Agee, H.R. and Chambers, D.L. (1984) Trap features that promote capture of the Caribbean fruit fly. J. Agric. Entomol. 1, 236–248.Google Scholar
Drew, R. A. I. (1987) Behavioural strategies of fruit flies of the genus Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae) significant in mating and host-plant relationships. Bull. Entomol. Res. 77, 73–81.Google Scholar
Drew, R. A. I. and Lloyd, A.C. (1987) Relationship of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their bacteria to host plants. Ann. Entomol. soc.Am. 80, 629–636.Google Scholar
Economopoulus, A.P., Raptis, A., Stavropuolou-Delivoria, A. and Papadopoulos, A. (1986) Control of Dacus oleae by yellow sticky traps combined with ammonium acetate slow release dispensers. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 41, 11–16.Google Scholar
Glass, H.W. and Gerhardt, R.R. (1984) Transmission of Moraxella bovis by regurgitation from the crop of the face fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J. econ. Entomol. 77, 399–401.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G.S. (1934) The alimentary canal of Calliphora with special reference to its musculature. Parasitology 26, 177–248.Google Scholar
Hendrichs, J. (1986) Sexual selection in wild and sterile Caribbean fruit flies. MSc. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Hooper, G. H. S. and Drew, R. A. I. (1979) Effect of height of trap on capture of tephritid fruit flies with Cuelure and Methyl Eugenol in different environments. Environ. Entomol. 8, 786–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, W. W. K. (1981) Fluctuations in numbers and the significance of the sex ratio of the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens caught in McPhail traps. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 30, 140–150.Google Scholar
Lopez, D.F., Steiner, L.F. and Holbrock, F.R. (1971) A new yeast hydrolizate-borax bait for trapping the Caribbean fruit fly. J. econ. Entomol. 64, 1541–1543.Google Scholar
Kapatos, E. and Fletcher, B. (1983) Seasonal changes in the efficiency of McPhail traps and a model for estimating olive fly densities from trap catches using temperature data. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 33, 20–26.Google Scholar
Malavasi, A., Morgante, J.S. and Prokopy, R.J. (1983) Distribution and activities of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies on host and nonhost trees. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76, 286–292.Google Scholar
McPhail, M. (1937) Relation of time of day, temperature and evaporation to attractiveness of fermenting sugar solution to Mexican fruitfly. J. econ. Entomol. 30, 793–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhail, M. (1989) Protein lures for fruitflies. J. Econ. Entomol. 32, 758–761.Google Scholar
Morton, T.C., Bateman, M.A. (1981) Chemical studies on proteinaceous attractants for fruit flies, including the identification of volatile constituents. Australian J. Agric. Res. 32, 905–916.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. and Economopoulos, A.P. (1975) Attraction of laboratory-cultured and wild Dacus oleae flies to sticky-coated McPhail traps of different colors and odors. Environ. Entomol. 4, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Salas, J.A. (1982) Evaluacion de la effectividad de diferentes tipos de trampas para detectar poblaciones de la mosca Mexicana de la fruta Anastrepha ludens (Loew). Agric. Tec. Mexicana 8, 39–47.Google Scholar
Sharp, J.L. and Chambers, D.L. (1983) Aggregation response of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) to proteins and amino acids. Environ. Entomol. 12, 923–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A.J. (1975) Synchronization of function in the foregut of the blowfly Phormia regina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) during the crop-emptying process. Can. Entomol. 107, 1193–1198.Google Scholar
Webster, R.P., Stoffolano, J.G. and Prokopy, R.J. (1979) Long-term intake of protein and sucrose in relation to reproductive behavior of wild and laboratory cultured Rhagoletis pomonella. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72, 41–46.Google Scholar