Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T07:16:19.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Translating Traditional Principles of System Development into a Process for Designing Clinical Information Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Pamela A. Gillis ,
Holly Booth ,
Judith R. Graves ,
Charles Steven Fehlauer  and
Jerome Soller
Pamela A. Gillis
Affiliation:
Bell Atlantic Health Care System
Holly Booth
Affiliation:
Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Judith R. Graves
Affiliation:
Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Charles Steven Fehlauer
Affiliation:
Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Jerome Soller
Affiliation:
Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traditional software development methodologies enhanced by a clinical component result in information systems that support the practice of nursing. This paper describes the clinical informatics model used to develop and evaluate a mobile computer assessment tool. Data entry of atomic-level elements, with storage in a relational database, allows the synthesis and analysis by multiple disciplines to aid in real-time decision making. The system is designed to improve the recording and accessibility of patient data and nursing observations on a geriatric unit at the Salt Lake VA Medical Center.

Type
Special Section: Assessing Nursing and Technology
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Spring 1994 , pp. 235 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Corcoran-Perry, S., & Graves, J.Supplemental information-seeking behavior of cardiovascular nurses. Research in Nursing and Health, 1990, 30, 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Eddy, D. Evaluation of clinical information systems. In Clayton, P. D. (ed.), Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. New York, NY: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991.Google Scholar
3.Fehlauer, C. S., & Graves, J. R.An informatics approach to quality assurance in the elderly (research in progress). Salt Lake City, UT: Salt Lake VA Medical Center Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, 1991.Google Scholar
4.Graves, J., & Corcoran, S.Design of nursing information systems: Conceptual and practice elements. Journal of Professional Nursing, 1988, 4, 168–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Graves, J., & Corcoran, S.The study of nursing informatics. Image: fournal of Nursing Scholarship, 1989, 21, 227–31.Google Scholar
6.Grobe, S. J.Nursing intervention lexicon and taxonomy study: Language and classification methods. Advances in Nursing Science, 1990, 13, 22–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Horton, W.Illustrating computer documentation: The art of presenting information graphically on paper and online. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991.Google Scholar
8.Lange, L. L. Information seeking by nurses during beginning of shift activities. In Frisse, M. E. (ed.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. New York, NY: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1992, 317–21.Google Scholar
9.Lockheed Missies and Space Company. Analysis of information needs of nursing stations. Department of Commerce, 1969. NTIS No. LMSC-6826684, pb. 186 246.Google Scholar
10.Meintz, S. L., & Shaha, S. H.Our hand-held computer beats them all. RN, 1992, 55, 52–55, 57.Google Scholar
11.Shneiderman, B.Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1987.Google Scholar
12.Shortliffe, E. H., & Barnett, G. O.Medical data: their acquisition, storage, and use. In Shortliff, E. H. & Perrault, L. E. (eds.), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990, 37–69.Google Scholar
13.Stead, W. W. Demand-oriented medical records: Toward a physician workstation. In Stead, W. (ed.), Symposium on computer applications in medical care. New York, NY: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1987, 275–80.Google Scholar
14.Weiderhold, G. Knowledge versus data. In Brodie, M. L. & Mylopoulos, J. (eds.), On Knowledge Base Management Systems. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1986, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar