RedETS, created in 2006, is the Spanish network of health technology assessment agencies. The objective of this work is to describe and assess the quality of the full economic evaluation reports on medical devices (FEEMD) carried out by RedETS.

The FEEMD were identified through the RedETS website publications database. Assessments about screening technologies were not included. The characteristics of FEEMD were analyzed using a formal RedETS HTA quality checklist. The characteristics extracted were analyzed through a descriptive univariate analysis.

Results : Twenty-six FEEMD were found. The publication years were distributed quite uniformly over time (approximately 2/year), although 7 were published in 2008 and 7 in 2013. Thirteen studies analyzed cost-utility, ten cost-effectiveness but not utility, and three both. The most frequent medical devices (MD) class analyzed were “In vitro diagnosis MD” (n = 8) and Class III products (8). The most frequent sources to analyze effectiveness were literature (22) and data collected through ad hoc studies (6). The main sources of unit costs were official public tariffs (14), manufacturers direct values (10) analytical accounting of one/more centers or regions (11) and DRGs (7). In relation to the modelling used, 14 evaluations performed Markov models and 7 decision trees. The perspective of 23 studies was that of the National Health System (NHS), and the rest corresponded to the perspective of a specific region (2) or social perspective (1). All studies analyzing time horizons greater than 1.5 years, except for 1, applied discount rates in the modelling. All studies included a sensitivity analysis.

The economic evaluations of MD published by the RedETS accomplish most of the quality checklist aspects and are therefore exhaustive. These FEEMD have been used in the framework of decision making for an efficient management of the NHS basic portfolio.