In Australia, technical guidelines for the health technology assessment (HTA) of medical technologies do not formally include broader societal benefits in the base case economic evaluation; they are considered supplementary analyses. If what matters to patients is relevant and valuable, then why shouldn’t these broader benefits play a more important role? This presentation will consider the challenges and opportunities for HTA guidelines to change to allow this, and the broader implications for decision makers.

A targeted literature review was undertaken to assess whether economic evaluation methods and their application in HTA are well positioned to assess what matters to patients. Practical challenges for this will be considered, particularly from the perspective of decision makers having a full understanding of broader societal benefits.

Preliminary findings from the literature review suggested that taking a broader societal perspective in economic evaluations used in HTA has the potential to enable more informed decisions for policy makers. However, there are practical considerations regarding consistent approaches to assessing broader societal and patient benefits.

For decision makers to be fully informed on the impact of their decisions beyond healthcare budgets alone, explicit consideration of a societal perspective is necessary. However, for decisions to be equitable across different patient groups, there must be consistency in methodological approaches. Fixing this current limitation should not prevent HTA from giving what matters to patients a central role now, and refining methods on an ongoing basis.