Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-18T17:57:32.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Measurement of Utility in Multiphase Health States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Jeffrey Richardson ,
Jane Hall  and
Glen Salkeld
Jeffrey Richardson
Affiliation:
Fairfield Hospital
Jane Hall
Affiliation:
University of Sidney
Glen Salkeld
Affiliation:
University of Sidney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To examine the validity of the additive quality-adjusted lite year model used to evaluate a multiphase health state, data from a pilot study of mammography were used to determine whether the values assigned to a multiphase postmastectomy health state could be estimated from a combination of the independently rated constituent health state values. The results suggest that they cannot.

Type
Research Notes
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Winter 1996 , pp. 151 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Brooks, R. G.Health status and quality of life measurement: Issues and developments. Stockholm: The Swedish Institute for Health Evaluation, 1991.Google Scholar
2.Culyer, A. J., & Wagstaff, A.QALYs versus HYEs. Journal of Health Economics, 1993, 12, 311–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Froberg, D. G., & Kane, R. L.Methodology for measuring health state preferences: II: Scaling methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989, 45, 459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Gafni, A., Birch, S., & Mehrez, A.Economics, health, and health economics: HYE versus QALYs. Journal of Health Economics, 1993, 12, 325–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Gerard, R., Dobson, M., & Hall, J.Framing and labeling effects in the measurement of health state utilities. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993, 1, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D.Negative time preference. American Economics Association Journal Papers and Proceedings, 1991, 81, 352–74.Google Scholar
7.Loomes, G., & McKenzie, L.The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Social Science and Medicine, 1989, 28, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Mehrez, A., & Gafni, A.Quality-adjusted life years, utility, theory and healthy-years equivalents. Medical Decision Making. 1989, 9, 142–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Mehrez, A., & Gafni, A.The healthy year equivalents: How to measure them using the standard gamble approach. Medical Decision Making, 1991, 11, 140–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Nord, E.Methods for quality adjustment of life years. Social Science and Medicine, 1992, 34, 559–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Richardson, J.Cost utility analysis: What should be measured? Social Science and Medicine, 1994, 39, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Richardson, J. Economic assessment of health care: Theory and practice. Australian Economic Review, 1991, 1st Quarter, 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Richardson, J., Hall, J., & Salkeld, G. The compatibility of measurement techniques and the measurement of utility through time. In Smith, C. S. (ed.) Economics and health: Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference of Health Economics. Melbourne: Public Sector Management Institute, Monash University, 1989.Google Scholar
14.Schoemaker, P.The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence, and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 1982, 20, 529–63.Google Scholar
15.Torrance, G. W.Measurement of health-state utilities for economic appraisal: A review. Journal of Health Economics, 1986, 5, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Torrance, G. W.Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1987, 40, 593–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed