Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:57:42.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Orphan Technologies: Defining the Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Judith L. Wagner
Judith L. Wagner
Affiliation:
Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Orphan Technologies
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Fall 1992 , pp. 561 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.American Academy of Family Physicians. Facts about family practice, 1991. Kansas City, MO: American Academy of Family Physicians, 1991.Google Scholar
2.Brown, S. (ed). Prenatal care: Reaching mothers, reaching infants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988.Google Scholar
3.Institute of Medicine. Medical professional liability and the delivery of obstetrical care, Volume I and II. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
4.Opinion Research Corporation. Professional liability and its effects: Report of a 1990 survey of ACOG's membership. Prepared for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, 09 1990.Google Scholar
5.Sahal, D.Patterns of technological innovation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1981.Google Scholar
6.U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Health care in rural America, OTA-H-434. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 09 1990.Google Scholar
7.U.S. Congress, Senate Bill 771, Amendment to the U.S. Orphan Drug Act, 98th Congress, Second Session, 1984.Google Scholar
8.Weisman, C. S., Morlock, L. L., Teitelbaum, M. A., et al. Practice changes in response to the malpractice litigation climate. Medical Care, 1989, 27, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar