Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:27:12.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hospital-and Patient-Related Characteristics Determining Length of Hospital Stay for Hip and Knee Replacements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Pekka Rissanen
Affiliation:
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Finland
Seppo Aro
Affiliation:
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Finland
Pekka Paavolainen
Affiliation:
Jorvi Hospital

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are among the most prestigious health care technologies. Their popularity has grown rapidly, and an increasing proportion of health care resources is allocated to them. We studied patient- and hospital-related factors that cause variation in a major determinant of hospital costs, the length of hospital stay (LOS) for THA and TKA. We gathered data on 10,288 hip and 5,173 knee patients with primary or secondary arthrosis from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register, which we linked with the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Patientand hospital-related variations in LOS were explained using regression models. Of the patient-related factors, complications caused the greatest prolongation of hospital stay, but patient's age, gender, and charge category also influenced LOS. Hospital-related factors were major causes of LOS variation. In the hospitals the average case-mix-adjusted LOS ranged from less than a week to 3 weeks. The number of arthroplasties performed in hospital was inversely related to LOS. The within-hospital LOS figures for THA and TKA were strikingly similar and persistent.

Type
General Essays
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Barber, T. C., & Healy, W. L.Hospital cost of total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between 1981 and 1990. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1993, 75–A:3, 321–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Boettcher, W. G.Total hip arthroplasties in the elderly: Morbidity, mortality, and cost effectiveness. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1992, 274, 3034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K.Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1986, 1, 2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dreghorn, C. R., & Hamblen, D. L.Revision arthroplasty: A high price to pay. British Medical Journal, 1989, 298, 648–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Editorial. Hip and knee joint replacements. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, 1992, 30, 5760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Friedman, B., & Elixhauser, A.Increased use of an expensive, elective procedure: Total hip replacements in the 1980s. Medical Care, 1993, 31, 581–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Goldie, I.Total hip and knee replacements. Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica, 1991, 62(suppl. 241), 2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Goldstein, H.Multilevel models in education and social research. London: Charles Griffin & Co. Limited, 1987.Google Scholar
9.Hard, R.Hospitals review ortho process to trim costs. Hospitals, 06 20, 1992, 54, 56.Google Scholar
10.Harris, W. H. & Sledge, C. B.Total hip and total knee replacement (first of two parts). New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 725–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Harris, W. H. & Sledge, C. B.Total hip and total knee replacement (second of two parts). New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 801–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jacobsson, Sven-A., Rehnberg, C., & Djerf, K.Risks, benefits and economic consequences of total hip arthroplasty in an aged population. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 1991, 19, 7278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Johnson, N. L., & Kotzs, S.Discrete distributions. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1969.Google Scholar
14.Johnsson, R., & Lindgren, L.Incidence of hip replacement in southern Sweden. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1987, 58, 226–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Keskimaki, I., & Aro, S.Accuracy of data on diagnoses, procedures and accidents in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. International Journal of Health Sciences, 1991, 2, 1521.Google Scholar
16.Kolmert, L., & Barsegård, B.En veckans vårdtid realistiskt mål vid total höfteplastik? Lakartidningen, 1992, 89, 1563–64.Google Scholar
17.Lahey, S. J., Borlase, B. C., Lavin, P. T., & Levitsky, S.Preoperative risk factors that predict hospital length of stay in coronary artery bypass patients >60 years old. Circulation, 1992, 86(suppl. 5) 181–85.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Mähönen, M.The reliability of Hospital Discharge Register as a tool for epidemiologic research on ischemic heart disease. Unpublished dissertation. Helsinki: Helsinki University, 1993.Google Scholar
19.Malchau, H., Herberts, P., & Ahnfeld, L.Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden: Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978–1990. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1993, 64, 497506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Möller, G., Goldie, I., & Jonsson, E.Hospital care versus home care for rehabilitation after hip replacement. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992, 8, 93101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Morscher, E., & Schassmann, A.Failures of total hip arthroplasty and probable incidence of revision surgery in the future. Archives of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery, 1983, 101, 137–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Paavolainen, P., Hämäläinen, M., Mustonen, H., & Slätis, P.Registration of arthroplasties in Finland: A nationwide prospective project. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1991, 62(suppl. 241), 2730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Quam, J. P., Michet, C. J., Wilson, M. G., et al. Total knee arthroplasty: A population based study. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 1991, 66, 589–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Raffiee, K., & Wendell, J.Interaction between hospital admission, cost per day and average length of stay. Applied Economics, 1991, 23, 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Rajaratnam, G., Black, N. A., & Dalziel, M.Total hip replacements in the National Health Service: Is need being met? Journal of Public Health Medicine, 1990, 12, 5659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Rissanen, P., Aro, S., Sintonen, H., et al. Health and quality of life before and after hip or knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995, 10, 165–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Rosenqvist, G., & Strandvik, T.NBDX: The negative binomial model with explanatory variables. Helsinki: Meddelanden från Svenska Handelshögskolan 197, 1989.Google Scholar
28.Rosenthal, G. E., & Landefeld, C. S.Do older Medicare patients cost hospitals more? Archives of Internal Medicine, 1993, 153, 8996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Salmela, R., & Koistinen, V.Is the discharge register of general hospitals complete and reliable? (In Finnish) Sairaala, 1987, 49, 480–82.Google Scholar
30.Sanders, D., Coulter, A., & McPherson, L.Variations in hospital admission rates: A review of the literature. London: Kings Fund, Project Paper No. 79, London.Google Scholar
31.Seagrott, V., Tan, H. S., Goldacre, M., et al. Elective total hip replacement: Incidence, emergency readmission rate, and postoperative mortality. British Medical Journal, 1991, 303, 1431–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Sommers, L. S., Schurman, D. J., Jamison, J. Q., et al. Clinician-directed hospital cost management for total hip arthroplasty patients. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1990, 258, 168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.STAKES. Overview on the population's health situation, use of health services and resources. Helsinki: National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, 1994.Google Scholar
34.Taylor, D. G.The costs of arthritis and the benefits of joint replacement surgery. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 1976, 192, 145–55.Google ScholarPubMed
35.Treacy, R., Carter, S., Grigoris, P., & Pynsent, P.Failed hip replacements. British Medical Journal, 1992, 304, 317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.van Dooslaen, E. K. A., & van Vlient, R. C. J. A.A build bed is a filled bed? An empirical re-examination. Social Science and Medicine, 1989, 28, 155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.van Vlient, R. C. J. A., & van Doorslaen, E. K. A.Disaggregation of the demand for hospital care. Applied Economics, 1988, 20, 969–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Westert, G. P.Variation in use of hospital care. Assan: Van Gorcum & Comp B. V., 1992.Google Scholar
39.Westert, G. P., Nieboer, A. P., & Groenewegen, P. P.Variation in duration of hospital stay between hospitals and between doctors within hospitals. Social Science and Medicine, 1993, 37, 833–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Wilcock, G. K.Benefits of total hip replacement to older patients and the community. British Medical Journal, 1978, 2, 3739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Williams, M. H., Newton, J. N., Frankel, S. J., et al. Prevalence of total hip replacement: How much demand has been met? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994, 48, 188–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed