Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T19:26:43.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A collaborative pilot on current awareness alerts for disinvestment and horizon scanning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2021

Vigdis Lauvrak*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Oslo, Norway
Rosmin Esmail
Affiliation:
Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Anna Lien Espeland
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Oslo, Norway
Kelly Farrah
Affiliation:
CADTH (Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Elisabet Hafstad
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Oslo, Norway
Ingrid Harboe
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Oslo, Norway
Antonio Migliore
Affiliation:
Centre for Economic and International Studies, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
Ingrid Kristine Ohm
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Oslo, Norway
Leigh-Ann Topfer
Affiliation:
CADTH (Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Vigdis Lauvrak, E-mail: vigdis.lauvrak@evihta.no

Abstract

Objective

In 2019, members of the Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi) Interest Group for Disinvestment and Early Awareness (DEA-IG) and the HTAi Interest Group for Information Retrieval (IR-IG) agreed to produce quarterly current awareness alerts for members of the DEA-IG. The purpose was to pilot a predefined strategy for sharing new publications on methods and topical issues in this area.

Methods

Literature search strategies for PubMed and Google were developed. Retrieved citations were posted on the DEA-IG Web site. Members of the DEA-IG received an email notification when new alerts were available. An informal survey of the DEA-IG members was used to provide feedback after the pilot.

Results

Six alerts were issued during the pilot (June 2019–September 2020) with a total of 170 citations. The bulk of the information were 124 PubMed indexed citations, and of these, 96 were retrieved by the PubMed search strategies. Google searches were not found to be useful, but ongoing horizon scanning work at the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) provided additional information. Based on retrospective sorting, we considered thirty-five PubMed citations to be highly relevant for health technology assessment (HTA). The response rate to the survey was limited (seventeen respondents), but most respondents found the alerts useful for their work.

Conclusions

The results of this pilot project can be used to revise search strategies and information sources, improve the relevance of the alerts, and plan for expanded dissemination strategies.

Type
Method
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

O'Rourke, B, Oortwijn, W, Schuller, T. The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36:187–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EuroScan International Network. A toolkit for the identification and assessment of new and emerging health technologies. Birmingham, UK: EuroScan International Network/University of Birmingham; 2014. Available from: http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/2120/1/EuroScan_Methods_Toolkit_October_2014_FINAL_CC_added.pdf.Google Scholar
HTA glossary. Edmonton, AB: HTAi (Health Technology Assessment International); 2020. Available from: http://htaglossary.net/HomePage.Google Scholar
Henshall, C, Oortwijn, W, Stevens, A, Granados, A, Banta, D. Priority setting for health technology assessment. Theoretical considerations and practical approaches. Priority setting subgroup of the EUR-ASSESS project. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:144–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruano Raviña, A, Velasco Gonzalez, M, Varela Lema, L, Cerdá Mota, T, Ibargoyen Roteta, N, Gutiérrez Ibarluzea, I, et al. Identification, prioritisation and assessment of obsolete health technologies. A methodological guideline. Madrid: Ministry of Science & Innovation/Galician Health Technology Assessment Agency (avalia-t); 2009. Available from: https://www.sergas.es/docs/Avalia-t/ObsoleteTechMemFinal.pdf.Google Scholar
Seixas, BV, Regier, DA, Bryan, S, Mitton, C. Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Specchia, ML, Favale, M, Di Nardo, F, Rotundo, G, Favaretti, C, Ricciardi, W, et al. How to choose health technologies to be assessed by HTA? A review of criteria for priority setting. Epidemiol Prev. 2015;39:3944.Google ScholarPubMed
Lepage-Nefkens, I, Douw, K, Mantjes, G, de Graaf, G, Leroy, R, Cleemput, I. Horizon scanning for pharmaceuticals: Proposal for the BeNeLuxA collaboration. Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2017. Available from: https://www.vbb.com/media/Insights_Articles/KCE_283_Horizon_Scanning_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Hines, P, Hiu Yu, L, Guy, RH, Brand, A, Papaluca-Amati, M. Scanning the horizon: A systematic literature review of methodologies. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e026764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gnjidic, D, Elshaug, AG. De-adoption and its 43 related terms: Harmonizing low-value care terminology. BMC Med. 2015;13:273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niven, DJ, Mrklas, KJ, Holodinsky, JK, Straus, SE, Hemmelgarn, BR, Jeffs, LP, et al. Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: A scoping review. BMC Med. 2015;13:255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polisena, J, Trunk, G, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, I, Joppi, R. Disinvestment activities and candidates in the health technology assessment community: An online survey. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35:189–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varela-Lema, L, Rozas, M, del Carmen, M, Preito Yerro, I, Arriola Bolado, P, Asua-Batarrita, J, et al. Herramienta PriTec: adaptación para la selección de tecnologías a evaluar previa entrada en cartera de servicios. Red Española de Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías y Prestaciones del SNS. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. Agencia Gallega para la Gestión del Conocimiento (ACIS). Unidad de Asesoramiento Científico-técnico, Avalia-t; 2018. Informe de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias 2018 [cited 2021 Jul 13]. Available from: https://runa.sergas.es/xmlui/handle/20.500.11940/11427.Google Scholar
Esandi, ME, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, I, Ibargoyen-Roteta, N, Godman, B. An evidence-based framework for identifying technologies of no or low-added value (NLVT). Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36:50–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HTAi. Information retrieval resources [cited 2020 Dec 21]. Available from: https://htai.org/interest-groups/information-retrieval/irg-resources/.Google Scholar
Horizon Scan Roundup — 2019. Ottawa (ON): CADTH; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 21]. Available from: https://cadth.ca/horizon-scan-roundup-2019.Google Scholar
Massonnaud, CR, Kerdelhué, G, Grosjean, J, Lelong, R, Griffon, N, Darmoni, SJ. Identification of the best semantic expansion to query PubMed through automatic performance assessment of four search strategies on all medical subject heading descriptors: Comparative study. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8:e12799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HTAi. Disinvestment and early awareness alerts 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 21]. Available from: https://htai.org/interest-groups/disinvestment-and-early-awareness/ig-resources/.Google Scholar
Hill, K. ‘Google Alerts’ are broken. Forbes. 2013.Google Scholar
Varela-Lema, L, Punal-Rioboo, J, Accion, BC, Ruano-Ravina, A, Garcia, ML. Making processes reliable: A validated pubmed search strategy for identifying new or emerging technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:452–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duda, N, Fleming, C, Kirwan, B, Roff, B, Rich, E. Evaluation of the AHRQ healthcare horizon scanning system. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. Available from: https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/horizon-scan/research.Google Scholar
HealthPACT. Welcome to the Australia and New Zealand horizon scanning network (ANZHSN). Brisbane, QLD: Australian Government. Department of Health. Health Policy Advisory Committee on Technology (HealthPACT); 2011. Available from: http://www.horizonscanning.gov.au/internet/horizon/publishing.nsf/Content/home-2.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lauvrak et al. supplementary material

Lauvrak et al. supplementary material

Download Lauvrak et al. supplementary material(File)
File 65.3 KB