Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T21:21:22.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiation characteristics of microstrip antenna on frequency selective surface absorbing layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Ashish Raj*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India
Nisha Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India
*
Author for correspondence: Ashish Raj, E-mail: raj.ashish.2890@gmail.com

Abstract

The radiation characteristics of the microstrip antenna (MSA) on the frequency selective surface (FSS) based absorbing layer is presented in this paper. It is observed that an absorbing layer placed between the MSA configuration and the ground plane helps in controlling the radiation characteristics of the antenna. It not only reduces the back lobe but also reduces the beamwidth and gain of the antenna simultaneously. This is because the absorbing layer absorbs some amount of power radiated by the antenna in both forward and backward directions. The proposed design is simulated using Ansys HFSS electromagnetic simulation software and the results are validated by comparing it with the results obtained from the equivalent circuit approach as well as experimental results. The effect of absorber on radiation characteristics of the radiator demonstrates its potential use in suppressing the radiation from the printed circuit board traces.

Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kim, JH and Lee, HM (2011) Front to back ratio improvement of a microstrip patch antenna using dual-band isolated soft surface structures. Microwave Optical Technology Letters 53, 23962400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, WG, Jang, HS and Yu, JW (2010) New method for back lobe suppression of microstrip patch antenna for GPS, The 40th European Microwave Conference, Paris.Google Scholar
Umair, H, Uddin, MJ, Ullah, MH, Latef, TBA, Mahadi, W and Othman, MB (2020) A unique metamaterial inspired star-slot UWB antenna with soft surface ground. Electromagnetics 40, 152163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranquilla, JM, Carr, JP and Al-Rizzo, HM (1994) Analysis of a choke ring groundplane for multipath control in global positioning system (GPS) applications. IEEE Transaction on Antennas Propagation 42, 905911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y and Ganguly, S (2004) Multiband L5 Capable GPS Antenna with Reduced Backlobes, Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2004).,(Long Beach) CA.Google Scholar
Baggen, R, Vázquez, MM, Leiss, J, Holzwarth, S, Drioli, LS and Maagt, PD (2008) Low profile GALILEO antenna using EBG technology. IEEE Transaction on Antennas Propagation 56, 667674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, RB, Klimczak, BK, Dutton, JD and McKinzie, WD (2002) Mitigation of Multipath Through the Use of an Artificial Magnetic Conductor for Precision GPS Surveying Antennas. In: 2002 IEEE-AP-S International Symposium & USNC/USRI National Radio Science Meeting. San Antonio, TX; 1621.Google Scholar
Anwar, RS, Mao, L and Ning, H (2018) Frequency selective surfaces: a review. Applied Science 8, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, F, Monorchio, A and Manara, G (2010) Analysis and design of ultra thin electromagnetic absorbers comprising resistively loaded high impedance surfaces. IEEE Transaction Antennas Propagation 58, 15511558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munk, BA, Munk, P and Pryor, J (2007) On designing Jaumann and circuit analog absorbers (CA absorbers) for oblique angle of incidence. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 55, 186193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, S and Fusco, V (2005) Thin radar absorber using artificial magnetic ground plane. Electronic Letters 41, 13111313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, J and Mittra, R (2001) Bandwidth enhancement of multiband antennas using frequency selective surfaces for ground planes. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Digest 4, 366369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, J, Mittra, R and Chakravarty, S (2002) A GA-based design of electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structures utilizing frequency selective surfaces for bandwidth enhancement of microstrip antennas. IEEE Antennas Propagation Society for International Symposium 2, 400403.Google Scholar
Weily, AR, Esselle, KP, Bird, TS and Sanders, BC (2007) Dual resonator 1-D EBG antenna with slot array feed for improved radiation bandwidth. IET Microwave Antennas Propagation 1, 198203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leger, L, Monediere, T and Jecko, B (2005) Enhancement of gain and radiation bandwidth for a planar 1-D EBG antenna. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 15, 573575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, S, Yadava, RL and Das, S (2013) A review on Adaptive Frequency Selective Surfaces (AFSS) based patch antennas. 2013 Computing Communication and IT Application Conference (ComComAp) (2013). 120124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, YC, Ding, J and Guo, CJ (2015) A semi-analytical numerical method for fast metamaterial absorber design. AIP Advances 5, 097108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar