Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:03:15.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multi-cut four-port shared radiator with stepped ground and diversity effects for WLAN application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2019

Leeladhar Malviya Open the ORCID record for Leeladhar Malviya [Opens in a new window]  and
Sanjay Chouhan
Leeladhar Malviya
Affiliation:
Shri G. S. Institute of Technology and Science Indore, Indore, India
Sanjay Chouhan*
Affiliation:
Jawaharlal Institute of Technology Borawan, Khargone, India
*
Author for correspondence: Sanjay Chouhan, E-mail: sanjaychouhanjit@yahoo.co.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A four-port shared radiator is proposed for 5.2 GHz wireless application using multiple-cut rectangular geometry and partially stepped ground. The difficulty in making the shared radiator structure is almost removed in the presented design, and without the help of any isolating structure, sufficient value of isolation is achieved. The proposed shared geometry produces isolation of >10 dB in the 4.96–5.5 GHz operating frequency band. The gain of the MIMO antenna varies from 2.4 to 5.5 dBi, and radiation efficiency is >63% in the proposed band. The ports are arranged in an orthogonal manner to reduce the mutual coupling. An envelope correlation coefficient is <0.03 in the proposed antenna band. The total active reflection coefficient bandwidth of the antenna is 500 MHz with best combination of input excitation angles of 90, 180°. The isolation in the proposed shared radiator is enhanced by creating multiple cuts and stepped ground. To check the suitability of antenna for indoor and outdoor environments the mean effective gain and specific absorption rate results are also presented in the paper and it found under the required safety norms as per the international telecommunication union for uniform and Gaussian environments.

Keywords

ECCisolationMEGMIMO antennaTARC
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 11 , Issue 10 , December 2019 , pp. 1044 - 1053
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Agarwal, M, Behera, AK and Meshram, MK (2017) MIMO-configured WLAN access point antenna with high port isolation. Journal of Electromagnetic Wave and Application 31, 1007–1019.Google Scholar
2.Pelosi, M, Knudsen, MB and Pedersen, GF (2012) Multiple antenna systems with inherently decoupled radiators. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60, 503–515.Google Scholar
3.Chou, HT, Cheng, HC, Hsu, HT and Kuo, LR (2008) Investigations of isolation improvement techniques for multiple input multiple output (MIMO) WLAN portable terminal applications. Progress in Electromagnetic Research 85, 349–366.Google Scholar
4.Malviya, LD, Panigrahi, RK and Kartikeyan, MV (2017) MIMO antennas with diversity and mutual coupling reduction techniques: a review. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 9, 1763–1780.Google Scholar
5.Kewei, Q and Decheng, G (2016) Compact tunable network for closely spaced antennas with high isolation. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 58, 65–69.Google Scholar
6.Lee, W and Jang, B (2016) A small 4 by 4 MIMO antenna system for LTE smart phones. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 58, 2668–2672.Google Scholar
7.Malviya, L, Panigrahi, RK and Kartikeyan, MV (2016) A multi-standard, wide-band 2 × 2 compact MIMO antenna with ground modification techniques. International Journal of Microwave and Optical Technology 11, 259–267.Google Scholar
8.Zhu, J, Feng, B, Deng, L, Peng, B and Li, S (2017) Coupled-fed tri-band MIMO mobile antenna for WWAN and LTE applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 59, 463–468.Google Scholar
9.Li, Z, Du, Z, Takahashi, M, Saito, K and Ito, K (2012) Reducing mutual coupling of MIMO antennas with parasitic elements for mobile terminals. IEEE Transactions on Antenna and Propagation 60, 473–481.Google Scholar
10.Soltani, S and Murch, RD (2015) A compact planar printed MIMO antenna design. IEEE Transactions on Antenna and Propagation 63, 1140–1149.Google Scholar
11.Sharawi, MS, Khan, MU, Numan, AB and Aloi, DN (2013) A CSRR loaded MIMO antenna system for ISM band operation. IEEE Transactions on Antenna and Propagation 61, 4265–4274.Google Scholar
12.Abdulraheem, YI, Oguntala, GA, Abdullah, AS, Mohammed, HJ, Ali, RA, Abd-Alhameed, RA and Noras, JM (2017) Design of frequency reconfigurable multiband compact antenna using two PIN diodes for WLAN/WiMAX applications. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 11, 1098–1105.Google Scholar
13.Piazza, D, Kirsch, NJ, Forenza, A, Heath, RW and Dandekar, KR (2008) Design and evaluation of a reconfigurable antenna array for MIMO systems. IEEE Transactions on Antenna and Propagation 56, 869–880.Google Scholar
14.Chouhan, S, Panda, DK, Gupta, M and Singhal, S (2018) Meander line MIMO antenna for 5.8 GHz WLAN application. International Journal of RF Microwave Computer Aided Engineering 28, 1–8.Google Scholar
15.Kayabasi, A, Toktas, A, Yigit, E and Sabanci, K (2018) Triangular quad-port multi-polarized UWB MIMO antenna with enhanced isolation using neutralization ring. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 85, 47–53.Google Scholar
16.Ram Krishna, RVS and Kumar, R (2015) Design of a square ring shape slot antenna for UWB polarization – diversity applications. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 69, 1305–1313.Google Scholar
17.De, S and Sarkar, PP (2015) A high gain ultra-wideband monopole antenna. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 69, 1113–1117.Google Scholar
18.Yanga, B, Chenb, M and Li, L (2018) Design of a four-element WLAN/LTE/UWB MIMO antenna using half-slot structure. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 93, 354–359.Google Scholar
19.Ali, WAE and Ibrahim, AA (2017) A compact double-sided MIMO antenna with an improved isolation for UWB applications. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 82, 7–13.Google Scholar
20.Chouhan, S, Panda, DK and Kushwah, VS (2018) Modified circular common element 4 port MIMO antenna using diagonal parasitic element. International Journal of RF Microwave Computer Aided Engineering 29, 1–8.Google Scholar
21.Moradikordalivand, A, Leow, CY, Rahman, TA, Ebrahimi, S and Chua, TH (2016) Wideband MIMO antenna system with dual polarization for WiFi and LTE applications. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 8, 643–650.Google Scholar
22.MoradiKordalivand, A, Rahman, TA and Khalily, M (2014) Common elements wideband MIMO antenna system for WiFi/LTE access-point applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 13, 1601–1604.Google Scholar
23.Wang, H, Huang, XB, Fang, DG and Han, GB (2007) A microstrip antenna array formed by microstrip line fed tooth-like-slot patches. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 55, 1210–1214.Google Scholar
24.Balanis, CA (2008) Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, 4th Edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publishers.Google Scholar
25.Chouhan, S, Panda, DK, Gupta, M and Singhal, S (2017) Multiport MIMO antennas with mutual coupling reduction techniques for modern wireless transreceive operations: a review. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 28, 1–13.Google Scholar
26.Chan, KH, Leung, SW, Fung, LC and Siu, YM (2004) Experimental study of the SAR characteristics of mobile phones. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 40, 22–26.Google Scholar
27.Srivastava, G, Kanuijia, BK and Paulus, R (2017) UWB MIMO antenna with common radiator. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 9, 573–580.Google Scholar