Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T14:01:09.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of sampling strategy on uncertainty and precision of flatness inspection studied by dynamic minimum deviation zone evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

A. Barari  and
S. Mordo
Get access

Abstract

Evaluation of geometric deviations for the purpose of determining compliance with specified form tolerances requires the acquisition of numerous measured data points and extensive computation to accurately characterize the inspected part’s geometry. If there are not enough data points measured or when the measured points are not distributed properly on the measured surface a high level of uncertainty in characterizing the inspected part’s geometry can be expected. However, increasing the number of data point also significantly increases the computational time and also increases computational uncertainty by adding to instability of the optimization process required to find the minimum deviation zone. Selections of number and location of the measured date points need to be performed by understanding the significance of these two sources of uncertainties. This paper discussed the effect of sampling procedure on uncertainty and precision of flatness inspection.

Keywords

Coordinate metrologydynamic minimum zone evaluationminimum deviation zonemeasurement uncertaintyconvex hull
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , 2013 , pp. 3 - 8
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hopp, T., Computational metrology, Manuf. Rev. 6, 295–304 (1993) Google Scholar
Barari, A., ElMaraghy, H.A., Knopf, G.K., Search-guided sampling to reduce uncertainty of minimum zone estimation, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 7, 360–371 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, W., Kurfess, T.R., Cagan, J., Sampling uncertainty in coordinate measurement data analysis, Precis. Eng. 22, 153–163 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ElMaraghy, H.A., Barari, A., Knopf, G.K., Integrated inspection and machining for maximum conformance to design tolerances, CIRP Ann. 53, 411–416 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocken, R., Raja, J., Babu, U., Sampling issue in coordinate metrology, Manuf. Rev. 6, 282–294 (1993) Google Scholar
G. Caskey, Y. Hari, R. Hocken, D. Palanvelu, J. Raja, R. Wilson, K. Chen, J. Yang, Sampling techniques for coordinate measuring machines, in Proc. of NSF Design & Manufacturing Systems Conference, Austin, TX, USA, 1991, pp. 983–988
Weckenmann, A., Eitzert, H., Garmer, M., Webert, H., Functionality oriented evaluation and sampling strategy in coordinate metrology, Precis. Eng. 17, 244–251 (1995) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, R., Wilhelm, R.G., Adaptive sampling for coordinate metrology, Precis. Eng. 23, 144–154 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traband, M.T., Joshi, S., Wysk, R.A., Carvalier, T.M., Evaluation of straightness and flatness tolerances using the minimum zone, Manuf. Rev. 2, 189–195 (1989) Google Scholar
J. O’Rourke, Computational Geometry in C, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998), pp. 182–192