Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:03:34.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist reconstructions of universalism and the discourse of human rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2009

Jill Marshall
Jill Marshall*
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Law, Queen Mary, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, universal principles and, in turn, the universalistic discourse of human rights, have fallen under critical review by feminist scholars. This is part of a more general suspicion of a search for universalism and abstraction in law: feminist legal scholars have highlighted and critiqued the gendered dimension of such an approach.1 Particular concepts fundamental to political, legal and social theory such as justice,2 equality,3 freedom4 and rights5 have been under the spotlight to see if their structure leads to detrimental consequences for women. Criticisms of rights have taken a variety of forms with rights being seen as too individualistic, reinforcing existing power imbalances, failing to account for women’s experiences and focusing too much on the public sphere.

Type
Review essay
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 87 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bunch, C. (1990) ‘Women’s Rights as Human Rights: Toward a Re-vision of Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 486–98.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, H. (1994) ‘What are “Women’s International Human Rights”?’ in Cook, R. (ed.) Human Rights of Women. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, chapter 3.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, H. and Chinkin, C. (2000) The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, R. J. (ed.) (1994) Human Rights of Women. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. (2000) ‘“And You Can’t Find Me Nowhere” Relocating Identity and Structure within Equality Jurisprudence’, Journal of Law and Society 27: 249–72.Google Scholar
Cornell, D. (1998) At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex and Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Engle, K. (1992) ‘International Human Rights and Feminism’, Michigan Journal of International Law 13: 517–610.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glendon, M. A. (1999) Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: The Free Press, MacMillan Inc.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, N. J. (2003) The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knop, K. (ed) (2004) Gender and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. (1998) Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Lacey, N. (2004) ‘Feminist Legal Theory and the Rights of Women’ in Knop, K. (ed.) Gender and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, chapter 2.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. (1984) The Man of Reason: Male and Female in Western Philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, C. A. (1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, C. A. (2005) Women’s Lives; Men’s Laws. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, C. A. (2006) Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. (2005) Humanity, Freedom and Feminism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. (2009) Personal Freedom Through Human Rights Law? Autonomy, Identity and Integrity under the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Naffine, N. (1998) ‘The Legal Structure of Self-Ownership: Or the Self-Possessed Man and the Woman Possessed’, Journal of Law and Society 25: 193–212.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1999) Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, S. M. (1989) Justice, Gender and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, S. M. (1999), ‘Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?’ in Cohen, J., Howard, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Susan Moller Okin with Respondents. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, Part 1.Google Scholar
Romany, C. (1994) ‘State Responsibility Goes Private: A Feminist Critique of the Public/Private Distinction in International Human Rights Law’ in Cook, R. (ed.) Human Rights of Women. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 85–115.Google Scholar
Smart, C. (1989) Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1992) ‘Atomism’ in Avineri, S. and De-Shalit, A. (eds) Communitarianism and Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, chapter 2.Google Scholar
West, R. (1988), ‘Jurisprudence and Gender’, University of Chicago Law Review 55: 1–72.Google Scholar
West, R. (1997) Caring for Justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar