Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-fkkrz Total loading time: 0.223 Render date: 2021-06-12T12:01:42.653Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Reflexive law and the reformulation of EC-level employee consultation norms in the British systems of labour law and industrial relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Aristea Koukiadaki
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Abstract

The 2002/14/EC Directive establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community allowed considerable flexibility in transposition and implementation. Viewing – in line with reflexive law theory – the Directive as a key tool in allowing EC law to become embedded in the national legal and industrial relations systems, the paper assesses its transposition and impact in Britain. The very flexibility of the Directive made it possible for the British social systems to respond in an innovative way to the changing forms of employee representation. But the relative weakness of the regulatory design of the transposing legislation with regard to the nature of the legal obligations, the enforcement mechanism and the degree to which legal resources could be utilised by trade unions constrained the re-configuration of labour law and its coupling to employee representation arrangements traditionally associated with the British industrial relations system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Barnard, Catherine (2006a) EC Employment Law, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnard, Catherine (2006b) Worker Representation in the UK, Comparative Labor Law Seminar ‘Decentralizing Industrial Relations and the Role of Labor Unions and Employee Representatives’, Tokyo, The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training.Google Scholar
Barnard, Catherine and Deakin, Simon (2002) Market Access and Regulatory Competition, in Catherine, Barnard and Joanne, Scott (eds) The Law of the Single European Market: Unpacking the Premises, 197–224. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Barnard, Catherine, Deakin, Simon and Hobbs, Richard (2003) ‘Opting Out of the 48-Hour Week: Employer Necessity or Individual Choice? An Empirical Study of the Operation of Article 18(1)(b) of the Working Time Directive in the UK’, Industrial Law Journal 32(94): 223–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercusson, Brian (2001) ‘The European Social Model Comes to Britain’, Industrial Law Journal 31(3): 209–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Mike (2008) ‘“French-style” Staff Consultation Laws Threatened by EU’, Personnel Today 31 March. Available at www.personneltoday.com/articles/2008/03/31/45111/french-style-staff-consultation-laws-threatened-by-eu.html.Google Scholar
Blanke, Thomas (1999) ‘European Works Councils as an Institution of European Employees Information and Consultation’, Transfer 5(3): 366–83.Google Scholar
Bogg, Alan, (2006) ‘Representation of Employees in Collective Bargaining within the Firm: Voluntarism in the UK’, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 10(3).Google Scholar
Broughton, Andrea (2005) ‘European Comparative Practice in Information and Consultation’, in John, Storey (ed.) Adding Value through Information and Consultation, 200–218. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, William, Deakin, Simon, Nash, David and Oxenbridge, Sarah (2000) ‘The Employment Contract: From Collective Procedures to Individual Rights’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 38(4): 611–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, Michael, (2004) ‘Information, Consultation, Recognition and Sanction’, Employment Lawyers Association Lecture, November 2004, London, ELA.Google Scholar
Central arbitration committee (CAC) (2006) Annual Report 2005–2006. London: Central Arbitration Committee.Google ScholarPubMed
Central arbitration committee (CAC) (2007) Annual Report 2006–2007. London: Central Arbitration Committee.Google ScholarPubMed
Central arbitration committee (CAC) (2008) Annual Report 2007–2008. London: Central Arbitration Committee.Google ScholarPubMed
Central arbitration committee (CAC) (2009) Annual Report 2008–2009. London: Central Arbitration Committee.Google ScholarPubMed
Cha (2005) A Little More Conversation: Employee Communications Approaches and Their Impact. London: CHA.Google Scholar
Charlwood, Andy and Terry, Mike (2007) ‘21st-century Models of Employee Representation: Structures, Processes and Outcomes’, Industrial Relations Journal 38(4): 320–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartered institute for personnel and development (CIPD) (2008) Survey Report September 2008. London: CIPD.Google ScholarPubMed
Clegg, Alicia (2005) ‘Why It Pays to Put Workers in the Picture: Employee Consultation’, Financial Times, 6 April, p. 15.Google Scholar
Commission (1998) Explanatory Memorandum to the Proposal for a Council Directive Establishing a General Framework for Informing and Consulting Employees in the European Community. Brussels: COM/98/612.Google Scholar
Commission (2008) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Review of the Application of Directive 2002/14/EC in the EU. Brussels: COM/2008/146.Google Scholar
Confederation of british industry (CBI) (2002a) European Proposals on National-level Information and Consultation, issue statement, updated 19 July 2002. London: CBI.Google Scholar
Confederation of british industry (CBI) (2002b) High Performance Workplaces: The Role of Employee Involvement in a Modern Economy–CBI Response. London: CBI.Google Scholar
Confederation of british industry (CBI) (2003) CBI Response to ‘High Performance Workplaces – Informing and Consulting Employees’. London: CBI.Google Scholar
Confederation of british industry (CBI) (2006) Employment Trends Survey 2006. London: CBI.Google Scholar
Cooney, Sean, Lindsey, Tim, Mitchell, Richard and Zhu, Yin (eds) (2002) Law and Labour Market Regulation in South East Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coupar, Willy (2009) ‘What Next for Information and Consultation?IPA Bulletin 84(5): 1–2.Google Scholar
Croner, (2005) Employee Information and Consultation Management Report. Surrey: Croner.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L. (1994) ‘A Challenge to Single Channel?Industrial Law Journal 23(3): 272–85.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul L. and Freedland, Mark (2007) Towards a Flexible Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Paul L. and Kilpatrick, Claire (2004) ‘UK Worker Representation After Single Channel’, Industrial Law Journal 33(2): 121–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, Simon (1999) ‘Two Types of Regulatory Competition: Competitive Federalism versus Reflexive Harmonisation. A Law and Economics Perspective on Centros’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 2: 231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, Simon (2009) ‘Reflexive Governance and European Company Law’, European Law Journal 15(2): 224–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, Simon and Morris, Gillian (2005) Labour Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Department of trade and industry (DTI, now BIS) (1998) ‘Fairness at Work’, Memorandum to the House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee, Cm. 3968.Google ScholarPubMed
Department of trade and industry (DTI, now BIS) (2002) High Performance Workplaces: The Role of Employee Involvement in a Modern Economy. London: DTI.Google Scholar
Department of trade and industry (DTI, now BIS) (2003a) High Performance Workplaces: Informing and Consulting Employees, London: DTI.Google Scholar
Department of trade and industry (DTI, now BIS) (2003b) Partial Regulatory Impact Assessment: Directive to Establish a General Framework for Informing and Consulting Employees in the UK. London: DTI.Google Scholar
Department of trade and industry (DTI, now BIS) (2004) Explanatory Memorandum to the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004. London: DTI.Google Scholar
Doherty, Michael (2008) ‘Hard Law, Soft Edge? Information, Consultation and Partnership’, Employee Relations 30(6): 608–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Paul, Edwards, Tony, Ferner, Anthony, Marginson, Paul and Tregaskis, Olga, with Adam, Duncan and Meyer, Michael (2007) Employment Practices of Multinationals in Organisational Context: A Large Scale Survey. Available from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/projects/mncemployment.Google Scholar
Elliott, Larry (2006) ‘Sir Digby Rides Off with All Guns Blazing’, The Guardian, 26 June. Available at www.guardian.co.uk/business/2006/jun/26/politics.theeuro (last accessed 20 November 2009).Google Scholar
Employer study group (ESG) (2004) Information and Consultation Benchmark Report 2004. Uxbridge: ESG.Google Scholar
Ewing, Keith (ed.) (2001) Employment Rights at Work: Reviewing the Employment Relations Act 1999. London: Institute of Employment Rights.Google Scholar
Ewing, Keith, (2003) ‘Labour Law and Industrial Relations’, in Peter, Ackers and Adrian, Wilkinson (eds) Understanding Work and Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition, 138–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falkner, Gerda, Treib, Oliver, Hartlapp, Miriam and Leiber, Simone (2005) Complying with Europe? The Impact of EU Minimum Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferner, Anthony and Hyman, Richard (1998) ‘Introduction: Towards European Industrial Relations?’, in Anthony, Ferner and Richard, Hyman (eds) Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, xi–xxvi. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark (2005) ‘Assessing the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations’, Industrial Law Journal 34(2): 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Mark (2006) ‘A Cool Response to the ICE Regulations? Employer and Trade Union Approaches to the New Legal Framework for Information and Consultation’, Industrial Relations Journal 37(5): 456–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Mark, Adam, Duncan and Koukiadaki, Aristea (2005) Results of the WMERF Information and Consultation Survey. IRRU, Coventry: University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark, Broughton, Andrea, Carley, Mark and Sisson, Keith (2002) Works Councils for the UK? Assessing the Impact of the EU Employee Consultation Directive. London: Eclipse Group.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark and Terry, Mike (2004) ‘The Emerging System of Statutory Worker Representation’, in , Geraldine Healy, Edmund, Heery, Philip, Taylor and William, Brown (eds) The Future of Worker Representation, 207–229. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Richard (2005) ‘The Case for the Reflexive Regulation of Weekly Working Time’. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Richard and Njoya, Wanjiru (2005) ‘Regulating the European Labour Market: Prospects and Limitations of a Reflexive Governance Approach’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 43(2): 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Hannah (2009) ‘Viewpoint: What Next for Employment Relations?IPA Bulletin, 80(1): 3.Google Scholar
Kahn-freund, Otto (1954) ‘The Legal Framework’, in Flanders, Alan and Hugh, Clegg (eds) The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain, 42–127. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kahn-freund, Otto (1983) ‘Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Great Britain and West Germany’, in Lord Wedderburn of Charlton, Lewis, Roy and Clark, Jon (eds) Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 1–14. New York: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kersley, Barbara, Alpin, Carmen, Forth, John, Bryson, Alex, Bewley, Helen, Dix, Gill and Oxenbridge, Sarah (2006) Inside the Workplace: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koukiadaki, Aristea (2008) ‘Reflexive Regulation and the Development of Capabilities: The Impact of the 2002/14/EC Framework Directive on Information and Consultation of Employees in the UK.’ PhD thesis, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Labour research department (LRD) (2004) ‘Information and Consultation’, Workplace Report 14: 15–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Lorber, Pascale (2003) ‘National Works Councils: “Opening the Door on a New Whole Era in United Kingdom Employment Relations?”’, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 19(3): 297–319.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1997) ‘Limits of Steering’, Theory, Culture and Society 14: 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, Imelda (1998) ‘Community Law in the National Legal Order: A Systems Analysis’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36(2): 237–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marginson, Paul and Sisson, Keith (2004) European Integration and Industrial Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mccarthy, William E. J. (2000) ‘Representative Consultations with Specified Employees – or the Future of Rung Two’, in Collins, Hugh, Davies, Paul L and Rideout, Roger (eds) Legal Regulation of the Employment Relation, 529–56. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Metcalf, David (1999) ‘The British National Minimum Wage’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 37(2): 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, John (2002) ‘Representation at Work: The Role of Trade Unions and the Role of the Law’, Industrial Law Society Meeting. Available from www.industriallawsociety.org.uk/papers/monks.htm.Google Scholar
Novitz, Tonia and Skidmore, Paul (2001) Fairness at Work – A Critical Analysis of the Employment Relations Act 1999 and its Treatment of Collective Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Overell, Stephen (2005) ‘Employers Fear Consultation Law: New Rights for Employees to be Informed and Consulted are Causing Serious Concern among UK Companies’, Financial Times, 3 March, p. 13.Google Scholar
Patterson, John and Teubner, Gunther (2005) ‘Changing Maps: Empirical Legal Autopoiesis’, in Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (eds) Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research, 215–37. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Personnel Today (2005) ‘3 Uses Video to Meet Staff Consultation Rules’, Personnel Today, 15 February.Google Scholar
Prosser, Thomas (2007) Europeanisation through Procedures and Practices? The Implementations of the Framework Agreements on Telework and Work-related Stress in Denmark and UK. Employment Relations Research Centre, FAOS Forskningsnotat 077, Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Rogers, Joel and Streeck, Wolfgang (eds) (1995) Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Co-operation in Industrial Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ralf and Wilthagen, Ton (1994) ‘Reflexive Labour Law – An Introduction’, in Rogowski, Ralf and Wilthagen, Ton (eds) Reflexive Labour Law, 1–19. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Talking People (2005) Survey on the UK Information and Consultation Law. London: Talking People.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1989) ‘How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law’, Law and Society Review 23(5): 727–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1998) ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences’, Modern Law Review 61(1): 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trade union congress (TUC) (1973) ‘Industrial Democracy’, Interim Report. London: TUC.Google ScholarPubMed
Trade union congress (TUC) (1995) Voice at Work: TUC Proposals for Rights to Representation at Work. London: TUC.Google Scholar
Trade union congress (TUC) (2006) ‘Congress 2006’, General Council Report. London: TUC.Google ScholarPubMed
Veale, Sarah (2005) ‘Information and Consultation: A TUC Perspective on the Key Issues’, in , John Storey (ed.) Adding Value Through Information and Consultation, 21–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welfare, Sarah (2004) ‘Learning to Talk the Hard Way: Information and Consultation’, Industrial Relations Services (IRS) Employment Review 809: 11–17.Google Scholar
Welfare, Sarah (2005) ‘High on the Agenda: Employee Information and Consultation’, Industrial Relations Services (IRS) Employment Review 833: 8–19.Google Scholar
Welfare, Sarah (2006) ‘A Two-way Process: Informing and Consulting Employees’, Industrial Relations Services (IRS) Employment Review 859: 8–15.Google Scholar
Wolff, Charlotte (2008) ‘Survey: Employee Communications’, Industrial Relations Services (IRS) Employment Review 903. Available from www.xperthr.co.uk/default.aspx.Google Scholar
5
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Reflexive law and the reformulation of EC-level employee consultation norms in the British systems of labour law and industrial relations
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Reflexive law and the reformulation of EC-level employee consultation norms in the British systems of labour law and industrial relations
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Reflexive law and the reformulation of EC-level employee consultation norms in the British systems of labour law and industrial relations
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *