Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:37:54.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Loyalists, cynics and outsiders: who are the critics of the justice system in the UK and the Netherlands?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

Marc Hertogh
Marc Hertogh*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, The Netherlands
*
M.L.M.Hertogh@rug.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent surveys in the UK and the Netherlands indicate that there is widespread dissatisfaction with the justice system. But who are these ‘critics’ of the justice system? Most previous studies only produced general statistics, while the persons behind the figures remained invisible. By contrast, this article aims to put a face to these numbers and discusses two ways of analysing the profile of the critics. Based on a review of existing survey data, the article first looks at their ‘demographic profile’. Next, the article also considers a second, alternative, approach. Based on their level of legal awareness and legal identification, it distinguishes four different ‘normative profiles’: legalists, loyalists, cynics and outsiders. Moreover, the article shows how these normative profiles may be applied in future comparative studies on legal mobilisation and legal protest. It is concluded that combining both approaches will help us to look beyond common stereotypes and consider the critics of the justice system as real persons with genuine concerns about the administration of justice in their country.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 31 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Van Aelst, Peter and Walgrave, Stefaan (2001) ‘Who is that (Wo)man in the Street? From the Normalisation of Protest to the Normalisation of the Protester’, European Journal of Political Research 39: 461–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elija (1999) Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Barnes, S. and Kasse, M. (1979) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bijlevelt, Catrien, Goudriaan, Heike and Malsch, Marijke (2007) ‘Ethnic Minorities and Confidence in the Dutch Criminal-Justice System’, in Tyler, Tom (ed.) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 277–301.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard (1998) ‘Patterns of Legal Culture: The Netherlands Compared to Neighboring Germany’, The American Journal of Comparative Law 46: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard (2006) ‘Dutch Legal Culture’, in Chorus, J. M. J., Gerver, P. H. M. and Hondius, E. H. (eds) Introduction to Dutch Law, 4th rev. edn. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 13–52.Google Scholar
Brown, D. (2005) ‘How Does England Incorporate the Results of Public Opinion Surveys on the Administration of Justice?’ in Parmentier, S., Vervaeke, G., Doutrepont, R. and Kellens, G. (eds), Public Opinion and the Administration of Justice: Popular Perceptions and Their Implications for Policy-Making in Western Countries. Brussels: Politeia, 169–86.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Mark (2007) ‘The Prosecutor's Fallacy’, New York Times, 16 May 2007.Google Scholar
Chapman, Becca, Mirrlees-Black, Catriona and Brawn, Claire (2002) Improving Public Attitudes to the Criminal Justice System: The Impact of Information (Home Office Research Study 245). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Collier, Richard (2006) ‘“The Outlaw Fathers Fight Back”: Fathers' Rights Groups, Fathers 4 Justice and the Politics of Family Law Reform – Reflections on the UK Experience’, in Collier, Richard and Sheldon, Sally (eds) Fathers' Rights Activism and Law Reform in Comparative Perspective. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 53–78.Google Scholar
Dekker, Paul, Maas-de Waal, Cora and Van der Meer, Tom (2004) Vertrouwen in de rechtspraak. Theoretische en empirische verkenningen voor een monitor. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Dekker, Paul and Steenvoorden, Eefje (2008) Continue Onderzoek Burgerperspectieven (COB Kwartaalbericht 2008/1). Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Dekker, Paul and Van der Meer, Tom (2007) Vertrouwen in de rechtspraak nader onderzocht. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Derksen, Ton (2006) Lucia de B. Reconstructie van een gerechtelijke dwaling. Diemen: Veen Magazines.Google Scholar
De Roos, Theo (2000) Het grote onbehagen: emotie en onbegrip over de rol van het strafrecht. Amsterdam: Balans.Google Scholar
Elchardus, Mark, De Groof, Saskia and Smits, Wendy (2008) ‘Rational Fear or Represented Malaise: A Crucial Test of Two Paradigms Explaining Fear of Crime’, Sociological Perspectives 51: 453–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elchardus, Mark and Smits, Wendy (2002) Anatomie en oorzaken van het wantrouwen. Brussel: VUB Press.Google Scholar
Elffers, Henk and De Keijser, Jan W. (2008) ‘Different Perspectives, Different Gaps. Does the General Public Demand a More Responsive Judge?’ in Kury, Helmut (ed.) Fear of Crime – Punitivity. New Developments in Theory and Research. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer, 447–69.Google Scholar
Ettema, Ageeth (2008) De Staat van het Recht anno 2008. Amsterdam: TNS Nipo.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrichs, David O. (1980) ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in the United States: A Conceptual Analysis’, Social Problems 27: 540–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genn, Hazel (1999) Paths to Justice: What People Do and Think About Going to Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1996) ‘The Legal Cultures of Europe’, Law & Society Review 30: 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Martha Liebler (1991) ‘Public Goods, Alienation, and Political Protest: The Sanctuary Movement as a Test of the Public Goods Model of Collective Rebellious Behavior’, Political Psychology 12: 623–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertogh, Marc (2004) ‘A “European” Conception of Legal Consciousness: Rediscovering Eugen Ehrlich’, Journal of Law and Society 31: 457–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertogh, Marc (2007) Rechtsvervreemding: tussen rechtsstaat en rechtsgevoel. Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.Google Scholar
Hertogh, Marc (2010) ‘Through the Eyes of Bureaucrats: How Front-Line Officials Understand Administrative Justice’ in Adler, Michael (ed.) Administrative Justice in Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 203–225.Google Scholar
Hirshman, Albert O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jasper, James M. (1997) The Art of Moral Protest. Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerolmack, Colin (2003) ‘Tracing the Profile of Animal Rights Supporters: A Preliminary Investigation’, Society & Animals 11: 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaase, Max (1988) ‘Political Alienation and Protest’ in Dogan, Mattei (ed.) Comparing Pluralist Democracies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 114–42.Google Scholar
Koelewijn, Jannetje (2005) ‘Hoogst verdacht, twijfels aan de schuld’, NRC Handelsblad, 17 December 2005.Google Scholar
Koomen, Mireille (2006) Lekenparticipatie in de strafrechtspraak. Het beeld van de Nederlandse bevolking. Amsterdam: TNS Nipo.Google Scholar
LeBon, G. [1896] (1978) ‘The Mind of the Crowds’, in Genevie, L. (ed.) Collective Behaviour and Social Movements. Itasca, IL: Peacock Press, 6–11.Google Scholar
Levin, Murray Burton (1960) The Alienated Voter: Politics in Boston. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Ludz, Peter C. (1976) ‘Alienation as a Concept in the Social Sciences’ in Geyer, R. Felix and Schweitzer, David R. (eds) Theories of Alienation: Critical Perspectives in Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meester, Ronald, Collins, Marieke, Gill, Richard and Van Lambalgen, Michiel (2006) ‘On the (Ab)Use of Statistics in the Legal Case Against the Nurse Lucia de B’, Law, Probability and Risk 5: 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, E. and Opp, K. (1986) ‘Rational Choice and Rebellious Collective Action’, American Political Science Review 46: 471–81.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth (2000) ‘Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment’, Law & Society Review 34: 1055–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth (1995) ‘Rechtsbewußtsein im wiedervereinigten Deutschland’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 16: 121–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, Walgrave, Stefaan and van Aelst, Peter (2005) ‘Who Demonstrates? Antistate Rebels, Conventional Participants, or Everyone?’, Comparative Politics 37: 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmentier, S., Vervaeke, G., Doutrepont, R. and Kellens, G. (eds) (2004) Public Opinion and the Administration of Justice: Popular Perceptions and Their Implications for Policy-Making in Western Countries. Brussels: Politeia.Google Scholar
Podgorecki, Adam, et al. (1973) Knowledge and Opinion about Law. London: Martin Robinson.Google Scholar
Rattner, Arye and Yagil, Dana (2004) ‘Taking the Law into One's Own Hands on Ideological Grounds’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law 32: 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattner, Arye, Yagil, Dana and Pedahzur, Ami (2001) ‘Not Bound by the Law: Legal Disobedience in Israeli Society’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 19: 265–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J. V. and Hough, M. J. (2005) Understanding Public Attitudes to Criminal Justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Deborah (2006) ‘Matt O'Connor: The Man Behind Fathers4Justice’, Independent, 4 July 2006.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert J. and Jeglum Bartusch, Dawn (1998) ‘Legal Cynicism and (Subcultural?) Tolerance of Deviance: The Neighborhood Context of Racial Differences’, Law & Society Review 32(4): 777–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1977) ‘Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey Evidence’, Law & Society Review 11: 427–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, Melvin (1959) ‘On the Meaning of Alienation’, American Sociological Review 24: 783–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwell, Priscilla L. (1985) ‘Alienation and Nonvoting in the United States: A Refined Operationalization’, The Western Political Quarterly 38: 663–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwell, Priscilla L. and Everest, Marcy Jean (1998) ‘The Electoral Consequences of Alienation: Nonvoting and the Protests Voting in the 1992 Presidential Race’, The Social Science Journal 35: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. and Hutter, M. (2000) ‘Homo Juridicus and Homo Oeconomicus: Communicative Fictions?’ in Baums, T., Hopt, K. and Horn, N. (eds) Corporations, Capital Markets and Business in the Law. Den Haag: Kluwer, 569–84.Google Scholar
Toharia, José Juan (2003) ‘Evaluating Systems of Justice Through Public Opinion: Why, What, Who, How, and What For?’ in Jensen, Erik G. and Heller, Thomas C. (eds) Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 21–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Walle, Steven and Raine, John W. (2008) Explaining Attitudes Towards Justice Systems in the UK and Europe (Ministry of Justice Research Series 9/08). London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Van der Meer, Tom (2004) ‘Vertrouwen in de rechtspraak: empirische bevindingen’, Rechtstreeks 1: 9–55.Google Scholar
Van Koppen, P. J. (2003) Verankering van rechtspraak. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Van Velthoven, B. C. J. and Ter Voert, M. J. (2004) Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2003: over verloop en afloop van (potentieel) juridische problemen van burgers. Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.Google Scholar
Zipp, John F. (1985) ‘Perceived Representatives and Voting: An Assessment of the Impact of the “Choices” vs. “Echoes”’, The American Political Science Review 79: 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar