Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T05:47:50.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The character of social connection in law and literature: lessons from Bleak House

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2009

Gary Watt
Gary Watt*
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that law and society are disconnected in practice, and that this is attributable, in part, to law’s disconnection from the arts and humanities in our schemes of formal education. When we draw out the legal yarn from its cultural fabric, we find that it is remarkably thin. It is especially inadequate to describe the complexity of human interconnection, and even lacks a language to express such commonplace connections as unmarried romantic cohabitation and non-profit clubs. To understand human interconnection and the law’s connection to society, we must read the law ‘in context’ – as being one fabric, one textile, with other literatures – and we must read with an appropriate ethic. To that end, this paper reads the law in the context of Dickens’s Bleak House, which has been called ‘a novel of connections’, and Forster’s Howards End, which exhorts us to ‘connect the prose and the passion’.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 263 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beer, Gillian (1999) Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald (1973) ‘The Mobilization of Law’, Journal of Legal Studies 2: 125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blount, Trevor (1965), ‘Dickens’s Slum Satire in Bleak House’, Modern Language Review 60(3): 340–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Alan R. (1969) ‘The Strategy and Theme of Urban Observation in Bleak House’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 9(4): 659–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David (2000) ‘The Limits of Concept Formation in Legal Science’, Social and Legal Studies 9(3): 439–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin (1938–1939) ‘Law as Literature’, Yale Law Journal 48: 489–507 [reprinted from the Yale Review, 1925].Google Scholar
Coles, Robert (1989) The Call of Stories: Teaching and the Moral Imagination. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Docking, Peter and Pittaway, Ian (1990), ‘Social Investment by English Pension Funds: Can it be Done?’, Trust Law & Practice 4(1): 25–29.Google Scholar
Donne, John (1624) Devotions upon Emergent Occasions, Meditation XVII. London: ‘A.M.’ [Augustin Matthewes] for Thomas Jones.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (2006) ‘Unpacking the Household: Informal Property Rights Around the Hearth’, Yale Law Journal 116: 226–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, Margot (2003) The Character of Credit: Personal Debt in English Culture, 1740–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fogle, Stephen F. (1952) ‘Skimpole Once More’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction 7(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, E. M. (1910) Howards End. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Forster, E. M. (1927) Aspects of the Novel. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Neil (1985) ‘Wonderful Chains: Dickens and Coincidence’, Modern Philology 83(2): 151–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fradin, Joseph I. (1966) ‘Will and Society in Bleak House’, PMLA (Publication of the Modern Language Association of America) 81(1): 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Stephen K. (ed.) (2005) Ethics, Literature, and Theory: An Introductory Reader, 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Henderson, Lynne (1987) ‘Legality and Empathy’, Michigan Law Review 85: 1574–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Edward T. (1914) Charles Dickens in Chancery: Being an Account of His Proceedings in Respect of the ‘Christmas Carol’ with Some Gossip in Relation to the Old Law Courts at Westminster. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. and Posner, Richard (1980) ‘Social Investing and the Law of Trusts’, Michigan Law Review 79: 72–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levit, Nancy (2001) ‘The Kindness of Strangers: Interdisciplinary Foundations of a Duty to Act’, Washburn Law Journal 40(3): 463–79.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. (1930) Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. New York: Oceana Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead (1995) ‘Trustees and their Broader Community: Where Duty, Morality and Ethics Converge’, Trust Law International 9(3): 71–77.Google Scholar
Massaro, Toni M. (1989) ‘Empathy, Legal Storytelling, and the Rule of Law: New Words, Old Wounds?’, Michigan Law Review 87: 2099–2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. (1986) ‘Liberal Jurisprudence and Abstracted Visions of Human Nature: A Feminist Critique of Rawls’ Theory of Justice’, New Mexico Law Review 16: 613–30.Google Scholar
Mcclain, Linda C. (1992) ‘“Atomistic” Man Revisited: Liberalism, Connection, and Feminist Jurisprudence’, Southern California Law Review 65: 1171–264.Google Scholar
Menkel-meadow, Carrie (2000) ‘Telling Stories in School: Using Case Studies and Stories to Teach Legal Ethics’, Fordham Law Review 69: 787–816.Google Scholar
Menlowe, Michael A. and McCall Smith, Alexander (eds) (1993) The Duty to Rescue: The Jurisprudence of Aid. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. (1992) ‘Culture, Power, and the Discourse of Law’, New York Law School Law Review 37: 209–229.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1854) ‘Letter to Harriet Taylor’, reprinted in Philip Collins (ed.) (1971) Dickens: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 298.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis (1971) ‘Introduction’ to Charles Dickens, Bleak House. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis (2001) ‘Moments of decision in Bleak House’ in Jordan, John O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, Merritt (1985) ‘The Ontology of Esther’s Narrative in Bleak House’, South Atlantic Review 50(2): 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naffine, Ngaire (2009) Law’s Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and the Legal Person. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Nobles, Richard L. (1992) ‘Charities and Ethical Investment’, Conveyancer 56: 115–18.Google Scholar
O’hara, Daniel T. (1988) Lionel Trilling: The Work of Liberation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan M. (1989) ‘Reason and Feeling in Thinking about Justice’, Ethics 99: 229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Norman (1990) Bleak House: A Novel of Connections. Boston: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Peltason, Timothy (1992) ‘Esther’s Will’, English Literary History 59(3): 671–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1997) ‘Against Ethical Criticism’, Philosophy and Literature 21(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, James M. (ed.) (1966) The Good Samaritan and the Law. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1762/1913), Du Contrat Social [The Social Contract], trans. Cole, G. D. H.. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Sadrin, Anny (1992) ‘Charlotte Dickens: The Female Narrator of Bleak House’, Dickens Quarterly 9: 47–57.Google Scholar
Schwarzbach, Fredric S. (1979) Dickens and the City. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Senf, Carol A. (1983) ‘Bleak House: Esther, and the Androgynous Mind’, Victorian Newsletter 64: 21–27.Google Scholar
Stoljar, Samuel J. (1973) Groups and Entities – An Inquiry into Corporate Theory. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Storey, Graham (1987) Charles Dickens: Bleak House, Landmarks of World Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan (1726) Gulliver’s Travels. London: Benjamin Motte.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (2000) ‘Contracting Worlds: The Many Autonomies of Private Law’, Social and Legal Studies 9: 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trilling, Lionel (1944/1967) E. M. Forster: A Study. London: Hogarth Press [new revised edn, 1967].Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel (1950) The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society. New York: Viking Press [London: Secker and Warburg, 1951].Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1991) ‘Critical Legal Studies: A Political History’, Yale Law Journal 100(5): 1515–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Ian (1995) Law and Literature: Possibilities and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Gary (2009) Equity Stirring: The Story of Justice Beyond Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd (1985) Heracles’ Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of the Law. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd (1988) ‘Law and Literature: No Manifesto’, Mercer Law Review 39: 739–51.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd (2006) Living Speech: Resisting the Empire of Force. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Melanie L. (2006) ‘Only Connect: Howards End and Theories of Justice’, Law and Literature 18(2): 253–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilt, Judith (1977) ‘Confusion and Consciousness in Dickens’s Esther’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction 32(3): 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar