Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7c2ld Total loading time: 0.39 Render date: 2021-12-07T13:34:50.239Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The Making of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2005

Jane Anderson
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Institution. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Email: jane.anderson@aiatsis.gov.au

Abstract

The challenge of how to stop the unauthorized use of Indigenous knowledge has been firmly constituted as a problem to be solved by and managed through the legal domain. In this paper, my questions are directed to the way Indigenous knowledge has been made into a category of intellectual property law and consequently how law has sought to define and manage the boundaries of Indigenous knowledge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Jane. “The Production of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law.” PhD Diss., University of New South Wales, 2003.
Anderson, Jane. “The Politics of Indigenous Knowledge: Australia's Proposed Communal Moral Rights BillUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal 23 (4) (2004): 585604.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jane. Law Knowledge and Culture: The Production of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press, forthcoming.
Asad, Talal. Genealogies of Religion: Disciplines and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1993.
Bennett, Gordon. “The Manifest Toe.” In The Art of Gordon Bennett, edited by Ian McLean and Gordon Bennett. Australia: Craftsman House, 1996.
Bell, Richard. “Bell's Theorem: Aboriginal Art: It's a White Thing.” Pamphlet, self published, 2002.
Bowrey, Kathy. “Who's Writing Copyright's History?European Intellectual Property Review 18 (6) (1996): 3229.Google Scholar
Bowrey, Kathy. Law and Internet Cultures. Cambridge and Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Bowrey, Kathy, and Mathew Rimmer, “Rip, Mix, Burn: The Politics of Peer to Peer and Copyright Law.” First Monday: Peer-Reviewed Journal on the Internet 7 (8) (2002). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_8/bowrey/index.html (accessed 2 September 2003).Google Scholar
Boyd White, James. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
Blakeney, Michael. “Bioprospecting and the Protection of Traditional Medicinal Knowledge of Indigenous Peoples: An Australian Perspective.” European Intellectual Property Review 19 (6) (1997): 298303.Google Scholar
Blakeney, Michael. “Protecting the Cultural Expressions of Indigenous Peoples under Intellectual Property Law—The Australian Experience.” In Intellectual Property Law 2002: The Legal Protection of Cultural Expressions and Indigenous Knowledge, edited by F. Willem Grosheide and Jan J. Brinkhof. Antwerp: Intersentia Publishers, 2002.
Cane, Scott. Pila Nguru: The Spinifex People. Fremantle: Fremantle Arts Centre Press, 2002.
Coombe, Rosemary. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the Law. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.
Curthoys, AnnCitizenship, Race and Gender.” In Suffrage and Beyond, edited by C. Daley and M. Nolan. Sydney: Pluto Press, 1994.
Davies, Margaret. Delimiting the Law: Postmodernism and the Politics of Law. London and Chicago: Pluto Press, 1996.
Davies, Tony. “Aboriginal Cultural Property?Law in Context 14 (2) (1996): 117.Google Scholar
Davila, Juan. “Aboriginality: A Lugubrious Game?Art and Text 23 (4) (1987): 538.Google Scholar
Deazley, RonanRe-reading Donaldson (1774) in the Twenty First Century and Why It Matters.” European Intellectual Property Review 25 (6) (2003): 2709.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition, translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
Department of Home Affairs, andthe Environment, Report of the Working Party on the Protection of Aboriginal Folklore. Canberra, December 1981.
Department of the Attorney General, Stopping the Rip Offs: Intellectual Property Protection for Indigenous Arts and Cultural Expression. Canberra, 1994.
Dodson, Michael. “Indigenous Peoples and Intellectual Property Rights.” In Ecopolitics IX: Conference Papers and Resolutions. Casuarina: Northern Land Council, 1996.
Drahos, Peter. A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Sydney: Dartmouth Press, 1996.
Edmond, Gary. “Thick Decisions: Expertise, Advocacy and Reasonableness in the Federal Court of Australia.” Oceania 74 (3) (2004): 190230.Google Scholar
Ellinson, Dean. “Unauthorised Reproduction of Traditional Aboriginal Art.” University of New South Wales Law Journal 17 (2) (1994): 32744.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter. Mythology of Modern Law. London and New York: Routledge, 1992.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. Modernism and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Ford, Linda. “An Indigenous Perspective on Intellectual Property.” Aboriginal Law Bulletin 3 (90) (1997): 13.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What is an Author?” In The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault's Thought, edited by Paul Rabinow. London: Penguin Books, 1984.
Gaines, Jane. Contested Culture: The Image, The Voice and The Law. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1994.
Golvan, Colin. Interview by Jane Anderson, 19 June 2002, tape recording, Owen Dixon Chambers, Melbourne.
Golvan, Colin. Interview by Jane Anderson. “Aboriginal Art and Copyright: The Case for Johnny Bulun Bulun.” European Intellectual Property Review 10 (1989): 34654.Google Scholar
Hookey, John. “The Gove Land Rights Case.” Federal Law Review 5 (1972): 85114.Google Scholar
Janke, Terri. Our Culture: Our Future. Report on Australian Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights (produced for Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies [AIATSIS] and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission[ATSIC]). Surry Hills: Michael Frankel and Company Solicitors, 1998.
Johnson, Vivien. Copyrites: Aboriginal Art in the Age of Reproductive Technologies. Sydney: National Indigenous Arts Advocacy Association and Macquarie University, 1996.
Kerruish, Valerie. “Reconciliation, Property and Rights.” In Lethe's Law: Justice Law and Ethics in Reconciliation, edited by Emilios Christodoulidis and Scott Veitch. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001.
Langton, Marcia. Valuing Cultures: Recognising Indigenous Cultures as a Valued Part of Australian Heritage (prepared for the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation). Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1994.
Leach, James. “Understanding Modes of Creativity in Relation to Ownership Regimes and Cultural Flows.” Paper presented at the Social Science Research Council Workshop on Intellectual Property, Markets and Cultural Flows, New York, 2003. http://www/ssrc.org/programs/ccit/publications/james.leach.rtf (accessed 3 June 2004.)
Litman, Jessica. Digital Copyright: Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet. Amherst NY: Prometheus Books, 2001.
Maddock, Kenneth. “Copyright and Traditional Designs: An Aboriginal Dilemma.” Aboriginal Law Bulletin 34 (1988): 89.Google Scholar
Marika, Wandjuk. “Copyright on Aboriginal ArtAboriginal News 3 (1) (1976): 7.Google Scholar
McGrath, Ann. “Beneath the Skin: Citizenship, Rights and Aboriginal Women.” Journal of Australian Studies 37 (1993): 99114.Google Scholar
Mezey, Naomi. “Approaches to the Cultural Study of Law: Law as Culture.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 13 (2001): 3567.Google Scholar
Michaels, Eric. “Bad Aboriginal Art.” Art and Text 28 (1988): 5973.Google Scholar
Morphy, Howard. Ancestral Connections: Art and Aboriginal Systems of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1991.
Murphy, Tim. “Legal Fabrications and the Case of ‘Cultural Property.’” In Law, Anthropology and the Constitution of the Social, edited by Alain Pottage and Martha Mundy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Myers, Fred. Painting Culture: The Making of an Aboriginal High Art. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002.
O'Faircheallaigh, CairanNegotiating Major Agreements: The ‘Cape York Model’.” Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Research Discussion Paper, 11 (2000): 117.
O'Malley, Pat. Law Capitalism and Democracy. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1983.
Pearson, Noel. “Aboriginal Law and Colonial Law Since Mabo”. In Aboriginal Self-determination in Australia, edited by Christine Fletcher. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press, 1994.
Perrin, Colin. “Approaching Anxiety: The Insistence of the Postcolonial in the Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People.” In Laws of the Postcolonial, edited by Eve Darian-Smith, and Peter Fitzpatrick. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1999.
Peterson, Nicholas, and Will Sanders, eds. Citizenship and Indigenous Australians: Changing Conceptions and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Povinelli, Elizabeth. “The State of Shame: Australian Multiculturalism and the Crisis of Indigenous Citizenship.” Critical Inquiry 24 (1998): 575610.Google Scholar
Povinelli, Elizabeth. “Consuming Geist: Popontology and the Spirit of Capital in Indigenous Australia.” In Millennial Capitalism and the Culture of NeoLiberalism, edited by Jean Comaroff and John Comaroff, 24170. Durham: Duke University Press, 2001.
Povinelli, Elizabeth. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2002.
Puri, Kamal. “Copyright Protection of Folklore: A New Zealand Perspective.” Copyright 22 (1988): 224.Google Scholar
Puri, Kamal. “Copyright Protection for Australian Aborigines in Light of Mabo.” In Mabo: A Judicial Revolution, edited by M. Stephenson and S. Ratnapala. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1993.
Rose, Mark. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Rose, Mark. “The Author as Proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the Genealogy of Modern Authorship.” In Of Authors and Origins: Essays on Copyright Law, edited by Brad Sherman and Alain Strowel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Rowse, Tim. “Indigenous Citizenship and Self-Determination: The Problem of Shared Responsibilities.” In Citizenship and Indigenous Australians: Changing Conceptions and Possibilities, edited by Nicholas Peterson and Will Sanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Sarat, Austin, and Jonothon Simon, eds. Cultural Analysis, Cultural Studies and the Law: Moving Beyond Legal Realism. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.
Saunders, David. Authorship and Copyright. London and New York: Routledge, 1992.
Sherman, Brad. “From the Non-original to the Ab-original.” In Of Authors and Origins: Essays on Copyright Law, edited by Brad Sherman and Alain Strowel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Sherman, Brad, and Lionel Bently. The Making of Modern Intellectual Property: The British Experience 1760–1911. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Sell, Susan, and Christopher May. “Moments in Law: Contestation and Settlement in the History of Intellectual Property.” Review of International Political Economy 8 (2001): 467500.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Nina. “Case Note: Infringement in Copyright in Aboriginal ArtworksAboriginal Law Bulletin 17 (1985): 5.Google Scholar
Thomas, Nicholas. “Art against Primitivism: Richard Bell's Post Aryanism.” Anthropology Today 11 (5) (1995): 157.Google Scholar
Thomas, Nicholas. Possessions: Indigenous Art/Colonial Culture. London: Thames and Hudson, 1999.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation—World Intellectual Property Organisation, Tunis Model Law on Copyright for Developing Countries, 1976.
United Nations Educational, Scientific. Model Provisions for National Laws on the Protection of Expressions of Folklore Against Illicit Exploitation and Other Prejudicial Actions, 1982.
Williams, Nancy. The Yolngu and Their Land: A System of Land Tenure and the Fight for its Recognition. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, 1986.
Woodmansee, Martha, and Peter Jaszi, eds. The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. London: Duke University Press, 1994.
Wright, Shelley. “Intellectual Property and the ‘Imaginary Aboriginal’.” In Majah: Indigenous Peoples and the Law, edited by Greta Bird, Gary Martin, and Jennifer Neilson. Sydney: The Federation Press, 1996.
Yunupingu, Galarrwuy. “From the Bark Petition to Native Title.” In Land Rights: Past Present and Future—Conference Papers. Canberra: Northern and Central Land Councils, 1997.
21
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Making of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law in Australia
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Making of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law in Australia
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Making of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law in Australia
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *