Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:56:19.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relicts and models of the RNA world

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2005

Kirsi Lehto
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, FI-20014 University of Turku, Finland e-mail: klehto@utu.fi
Alexey Karetnikov
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, FI-20014 University of Turku, Finland e-mail: klehto@utu.fi

Abstract

It is widely believed that the current DNA–RNA–protein-based life forms have evolved from preceding RNA–protein-based life forms, and these again, from mere RNA replicons. By rationale, it can be assumed that the early RNA replicons were fully heterotrophic in terms of obtaining all their building blocks from their environment. In the absence of protein catalysts, their essential life functions had to be mediated by simple functional structures and mechanisms, such as RNA secondary structures, RNA–RNA interactions and RNA-mediated catalysis, and possibly by catalytic minerals or clays. The central role of RNA catalysts in early life forms is supported by the fact that several catalytic RNAs still perform central biological functions in current life forms, and at least some of these may be derived as molecular relicts from the early RNA-based life. The RNA-catalysed metabolic reactions and molecular fossils are more conserved in the eukaryotic life forms than in the prokaryotes, suggesting that the linear eukaryote genomes may more closely resemble the structure and function of the early RNA replicons, than what do the circular prokaryote genomes. Present-day RNA viruses and viroids utilize ultimately simple life strategies, which may be similar to those used by the early RNA replicons. Thus, molecular and functional properties of viruses and viroids may be considered as examples or models of the structures and replication mechanisms, which might have been used for the replication of the early biopolymers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)