Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T03:08:49.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stromatolite photomorphogenesis: lighting up their shape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2022

Gregory W. Ojakangas*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry & Physics, Drury University, Springfield, MO 65802, USA
Stanley M. Awramik
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
Michael C. Storrie-Lombardi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711, USA Kinohi Institute, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA 93109, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Gregory W. Ojakangas, E-mail: gojakang@drury.edu

Abstract

Most stromatolites are built by photosynthetic organisms, for which sunlight is a driving factor. We examine stromatolite morphogenesis with modelling that incorporates the growth rate of cyanobacteria (the dominant stromatolite-builder today, and presumably through much of the past), as a function of the amount of irradiance received. This function is known to be non-monotonic, with a maximum beyond which growth rate decreases. We define optimal irradiance as that which generates maximal growth, and we find fundamentally different morphologies are predicted under suboptimal and superoptimal direct irradiance. When the direct irradiance is suboptimal, narrow widely spaced columns are predicted, with sharp apices resembling conical stromatolites. When it is superoptimal, broad, closely spaced, flattened domical forms appear. Such disparate morphologies could also occur as a result of other vector-flux-dependent growth factors (e.g. currents). A differential equation is developed that describes the rate of change of the radius of curvature R at the apex of a growing stromatolite column, allowing simple simulations of the time evolution of R for model stromatolites. The term photomorphism is proposed to describe the disparate morphologies that may arise due to the effects described here (and photomorphogenesis as the process). Model results appear to explain, at least qualitatively, the morphologies of a number of stromatolites. If stromatolites are encountered on Mars, our model suggests that they are quite likely to be conical in form, owing to likely suboptimal irradiance since Mars has always received less irradiance than Earth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allwood, AC, Walter, MR, Kamber, BS and Burch, IW (2006) Stromatolite reef from the Early Archaean era of Australia. Nature 441, 714718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allwood, AC, Grotzinger, JP, Knoll, AH, Burch, IW, Anderson, MS, Coleman, ML and Kanik, I (2009) Controls on development and diversity of early Archaean stromatolites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 106, 95489555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, JA and Flood, DJ (1989) Solar radiation on Mars. NASA Technical Memorandum 102299, 131.Google Scholar
Awramik, SM (1976) Gunflint stromatolites: microfossil distribution in relation to stromatolite morphology. In Walter, MR (ed.), Stromatolites. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 311320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, MT, Burne, RV, Henry, BI and Watt, SD (2000) Deterministic KPZ model for stromatolite laminae. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 282, 123136.10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00077-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, MT, Burne, RV, Henry, BI and Watt, SD (2003) Mathematical and image analysis of stromatolite morphogenesis. Mathematical Geology 35, 789803.10.1023/B:MATG.0000007779.17079.fdCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, MT, Burne, RV, Henry, BI and Jackson, MJ (2004) A case for biotic morphogenesis of coniform stromatolites. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 337, 319326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, WM, Corsetti, FA, Pepe-Ranney, C, Hammond, DE, Beaumont, W and Spear, JR (2011) Hot spring siliciceous stromatolites from Yellowstone National Park: assessing growth rate and lamination formation. Geobiology 9, 411424.Google ScholarPubMed
Bontognali, TR, D'Angeli, IM, Tisato, N, Vasconcelos, C, Bernasconi, SM, Gonzales, ER and De Waele, J (2016) Mushroom speleothems: stromatolites that formed in the absence of phototrophs. Frontiers in Earth Science 4, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, AJ, Cudahy, TJ and Walter, MR (2004) Short wave infrared reflectance investigation of sites of palaeobiological interest: applications for Mars exploration. Astrobiology 4, 359376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, AJ, Viviano, CE and Goudge, TA (2020) Olivine-carbonate mineralogy of the Jezero Crater region. Journal of Geophysical Research Planets 125, e2019JE006011. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JE006011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, JDA and Stoker, CR (2013) Searching for stromatolites: the 3.4 Ga Strelley Pool formation (Pilbara Region, Western Australia) as a Mars analogue. Icarus 101, 129143.Google Scholar
Cuerno, R, Escudero, C, García-Ruiz, JM and Herrero, MA (2012) Pattern formation in stromatolites: insights from mathematical modelling. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 9, 10511062.10.1098/rsif.2011.0516CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decho, AW and Gutierrez, T (2017) Microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in ocean systems. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, 922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Depetris, A, Peter, H, Bordoloi, AD, Bernard, H, Niayifar, A, Kuhl, M, de Anna, P and Battin, TJ (2021) Morphogenesis and oxygen dynamics in phototrophic biofilms growing across a gradient of hydraulic conditions. iScience 24, 102067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eilers, PHC and Peeters, JCH (1988) A model for the relationship between light intensity and the rate of photosynthesis in phytoplankton. Ecological Modelling 42, 199215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endal, AS (1981) Evolutionary variations of solar luminosity. In NASA Technology Report (N82-17014 07-92) Goddard Space Flight Center Variations of the Solar Constant, pp. 175183.Google Scholar
Evans, LV (2003) Biofilms: Recent Advances in Their Study and Control. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Grey, K and Awramik, SM (2020) Handbook for the study and description of microbialites. Geological Survey of Western Australia, Bulletin 147, 278.Google Scholar
Grotzinger, JP and Rothman, DH (1996) An abiotic model for stromatolite morphogenesis. Nature 383, 423425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotzinger, JP and Knoll, AH (1999) Stromatolites in Precambrian carbonates: evolutionary mileposts or environmental dipsticks? Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 27, 313358.10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, HJ (1969) Attributes of stromatolites. Geological Survey Canada Paper 69-39, in Geological Survey of Canada, Dept. of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Hofmann, HJ (1973) Stromatolites: characteristics and utility. Earth-Sciences Review 9, 339373.10.1016/0012-8252(73)90002-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horodyski, RJ (1977) Environmental influence on columnar stromatolite branching patterns: examples from the middle Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, Glacier National Park, Montana. Journal of Paleontology 51, 661671.Google Scholar
Kopp, G and Lean, J (2011) A new, lower value of total solar irradiance: evidence and climate significance. Geophysical Research Letters 38, L0170610.1029/2010GL045777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, RE, Harris, JK, Wilcox, J, Spear, JR, et al. (2006) Unexpected diversity and complexity of the Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat. Applied Environmental Microbiology 72, 36853695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logan, BW, Hoffman, P and Gebelein, CD (1974) Algal mats, cryptalgal fabrics, and structures, Hamelin Pool, Western Australia. In Logan, BW, Read, JF, Hagan, GM, Hoffman, P, Brown, RG, Woods, PJ and Gebelein, CD (eds), Evolution and Diagenesis of Quaternary Carbonate Sequences, Shark Bay, Western Australia. Tulsa, OK: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, vol. 22, pp. 140194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paerl, HW, Pinckney, JL and Steppe, TF (2000) Cyanobacterial–bacterial mat consortia: examining the functional unit of microbial survival and growth in extreme environments. Environmental Microbiology 2, 1126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pei, Y, Duda, JP, Schoenig, J, Luo, C and Reitner, J (2021) Late Anisian microbe-metazoan build-ups in the Germanic basin: aftermath of the Permian–Triassic crisis. Lethaia 54, 823844.Google Scholar
Pentecost, A (1978) Blue-green algae and freshwater carbonate deposits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 200, 4361.Google Scholar
Petroff, AP, Sim, MS, Maslov, A, et al. (2010) Biophysical basis for the geometry of conical stromatolites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 107, 99569961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popall, RM, Bolhuis, H, Muyzer, G and Sánchez-Román, M (2020) Stromatolites as biosignatures of atmospheric oxygenation: carbonate biomineralization and UV-C resilience in a Geitlerinema sp. – dominated culture. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieto-Barajas, CM, Valencia-Cantero, E and Santoyo, G (2018) Microbial mat ecosystems: structure types, functional diversity, and biotechnological application. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 31, 4856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, JA (2011) The cost of photoinhibition. Physiologia Plantarum 142, 87104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semikhatov, MA, Gebelein, CD, Cloud, P, et al. (1979) Stromatolite morphogenesis – progress and problems. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 16, 9921015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shear, H and Walsby, AE (1975) An investigation into the possible light-shielding role of gas vacuoles in a planktonic blue-green alga. British Phycology Journal 10, 241251.10.1080/00071617500650231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorokin, C and Krauss, R (1958) The effects of light intensity on the growth rates of green algae. Plant Physiology 33, 109113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storrie-Lombardi, MC and Brown, AJ (2004) Using complexity analysis to distinguish field images of stromatoloids from surrounding rock matrix in 3.45 Ga Strelley Pool Chert, Western Australia. Lunar and Planetary Science 35, 12.Google Scholar
Toneatti, D, Albarracín, V, Flores, M, Polerecky, L and Farías, M (2017) Stratified bacterial diversity along physico-chemical gradients in high-altitude modern stromatolites. Frontiers of Microbiology 8, 646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Liere, L and Walsby, AE (1982) Interactions of cyanobacteria with light. In Carr, NG and Whitton, BE (eds), The Biology of Cyanobacteria. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 945.Google Scholar
Visscher, PT, Reid, RP, Bebout, BM, et al. (1998) Formation of lithified micritic laminae in modern marine stromatolites (Bahamas): the role of sulfur cycling. American Minerology 83, 14821493.10.2138/am-1998-11-1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, MR and Des Marais, DJ (1993) Preservation of biological information in thermal-spring deposits – developing a strategy for the search for fossil life on Mars. Icarus 101, 129143. http://A1993KQ05300011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsborough, BM and Golubić, S (1987) The role of diatoms in stromatolite growth: two examples from modern freshwater settings 1. Journal of Phycology 23, 195201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, G, Picioreanu, C and van Loosdrecht, MCM (2007) Kinetic modeling of phototrophic biofilms: the PHOBIA model. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 97, 10641079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, HL, White, RA, Visscher, PT, et al. (2018) Disentangling the drivers of functional complexity at the metagenomic level in Shark Bay microbial mat microbiomes. International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 12, 26192639.Google ScholarPubMed