Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T00:39:09.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anglo–Vietnamese diplomatic relationship in the seventeenth century: the case of the English East India Company

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2021

Ngoc Dung Tran*
Affiliation:
Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, Viet Nam
*
Author for correspondence: Dung Ngoc Tran, E-mail: tranngocdung.hcma@gmail.com

Abstract

Drawing on primary materials from the English East India Company (EIC) archives in the British Library (London, UK), this article investigates the early diplomatic encounters between England and Vietnam (Tonkin and Cochinchina) in the seventeenth century. Previous studies have mostly focused on the English trade in Vietnam in that period and their diplomatic missions from the late eighteenth century to 1858 but partly neglected their diplomacy in their first connections with Vietnam (1614–1705). This article thus investigates how the EIC adapted its gift-giving diplomacy to the diverse and shifting political landscape of the Tonkin and Cochinchina kingdoms. While the Trịnh Lords in Tonkin severely limited diplomatic and trade exchanges with EIC agents and other European traders, the Nguyễn Lords in Cochinchina welcomed relations with EIC representatives as it served their ambition to facilitate trade and establish military alliances with other powerful actors in the region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this article was published in Vietnamese. See Trần Ngọc Dũng “Tiếp xúc ngoại giao Anh – Việt Nam thế kỷ XVII dưới góc nhìn của người Anh” [Anglo–Vietnamese diplomatic connections in the seventeenth century from British perspective], Nghiên cứu Lịch sử [Historical Studies], vol. 4/516, 2019, pp. 11–22. This article refines the arguments made in the Vietnamese article and also includes new research by putting the Anglo-Vietnamese relations in the concept of English gift-giving diplomacy. More materials were investigated to provide viewpoints of Tonkin and Cochinchina in the relations with the English.

References

Arano, Yasunori (2005). “The Formation of a Japan-Centric World Order.” International Journal of Asian Studies 2:2, pp. 85188.Google Scholar
Bottomley, Ian (2004). “Diplomacy Gifts and Armour Between Japan and Europe During the 16th and 17th Centuries.” Arms & Armour 1: 1, pp. 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauner, Christina (2016). “Connecting Things: Trading Companies and Diplomatic Gift-Giving on the Gold and Slave Coasts in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” Journal of Early Modern History 20:4, pp. 408–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, John (1810). Annals of the Honorable East-India Company: From Their Establishment by the Charter of Queen Elizabeth, 1600, to the Union of the London and English East-India Companies, 1707–08, vol. 3. London: Black, Parry, and Kingsbury.Google Scholar
Carrió-Invernizzi, Diana (2008). “Gift and Diplomacy in Seventeenth-Century Spanish Italy.” The Historical Journal 51:4, pp. 881–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, Kriti N. and Jonathan, Israel I. (1991). “The English and Dutch East India Companies and the Glorious Revolution of 1688–89.” In The Anglo–Dutch Moment: Essays on the Glorious Revolution and its World Impact, ed. Jonathan, Israel I., pp. 407–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Hung-Guk (2000). “The Trade Between China, Japan, Korea and Southeast Asia in the 14th Century Through the 17th Century Period.” International Area Review 3:2, pp. 67107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, A (1793). Oriental Repertory, vol. 1. London: G. Biggs Publishers.Google Scholar
Dampier, William (1931). Voyages and Discoveries. London: Argonaut Press.Google Scholar
Đỗ, Thị Thùy Lan (2015). “Phố Hiến trong hệ thống cảng thị Đàng Ngoài thế kỷ XVII - XVIII: Tư liệu và nhận thức” [Phố Hiến in the Tonkin's City-Port System in the 17th and 18th Centuries: Materials and latest ideas]. Nghiên cứu và phát triển [Research and Development] 3, pp. 4171.Google Scholar
Đỗ, Thị Thùy Lan (2018). Hệ thống cảng thị trên sông Đàng Ngoài: Lịch sử ngoại thương Việt Nam thế kỷ XVII-XVIII [Ports in Tonkin”s river system: History of Vietnamese overseas Trade in the 17th and 18th centuries]. Hanoi: Vietnam National University Press.Google Scholar
Dror, Olga and Taylor, K. W. (2006). Views of Seventeenth-Century Vietnam: Christoforo Borri on Cochinchina and Samuel Baron in Tonkin. Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program Publications.Google Scholar
Escribano-Páez, J. M. (2020). “Diplomatic Gifts, Tributes and Frontier Violence: Circulation of Contentious Presents in the Moluccas (1575–1606).” Diplomatica 2:2, pp. 248–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, Anthony (1991). The English Factory in Japan: 1613–1623, 2 vols. London: British Library.Google Scholar
Feng, Zhang (2009). “Rethinking the ‘Tribute System’: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 2:4, pp. 545–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, William (1930). Alexander Hamilton, A new Account of the East Indies. London: Argonaut Press.Google Scholar
Fujita, Reio (2013). “Quan hê Nhật – Việt thế kỷ XVI-XVII nhìn từ văn thư ngoại giao.” [Japanese-Vietnamese relations in the 16th-17th centuries from viewpoint of diplomatic documents], In Lịch sử Giao lưu Việt Nam – Nhật Bản [History of Vietnamese – Japanese Interaction], ed. Thu Giang, Phạm Thị, pp. 3755. Hanoi: World Publishers.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Riichiro (1994). “The Regulation of the Chinese Under the Trịnh Regime and Phố Hiến.” In Pho Hien: Centre of International Commerce in the 17th–18th Centuries, ed. Hung, Hai province, Hưng Yên: World Publishers, pp. 96–100.Google Scholar
Gallop, Annabel Teh (2003). “Seventeenth-century Indonesian Letters in the Public Record Office.” Indonesia and the Malay World 31:91, pp. 412–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, Gao (2014). “The Amherst Embassy and British Discoveries in China.” The Journal of the Historical Association 99:337, pp. 568–87.Google Scholar
Harrison, Henrietta (2018). “Chinese and British Diplomatic Gifts in the Macartney Embassy of 1793.” English Historical Review 133:560, pp. 6597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoang, Anh Tuan (2005). “From Japan to Manila and Back to Europe: The Abortive English Trade with Tonkin in the 1670s.” Itinerario 29:3, pp. 7392.Google Scholar
Hoang, Anh Tuan (2007). Silk for Silver: Vietnamese-Dutch Relationship 1637–1700. Leiden: Brill Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoàng, Anh Tuấn (2010). Tư liệu các công ty Đông Ấn Hà Lan và Anh về Kẻ Chợ – Đàng Ngoài thế kỷ XVII [Primary Materials of the VOC and EIC about Ke Cho – Tonkin in the Seventeenth Century]. Hanoi: Hanoi Press.Google Scholar
Hoang, Anh Tuan (2018). “The End of a Commercial Era: From the English Junk Affair to the Vietnamese Maritime Embargo in 1693.” Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy 30:2, pp. 279302.Google Scholar
Hoàng, Anh Tuấn (2019). Công ty Đông Ấn Hà Lan ở Kẻ Chợ – Đàng Ngoài (16371700) [The Dutch East India Company in Ke Cho – Tonkin (16371700)]. Hanoi: Hanoi Press.Google Scholar
Iioka, N. (2009). Literati Entrepreneur: Wei Zhiyan in the Tonkin-Nagasaki Silk Trade. PhD Dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Innes, R. (1980). The Door Ajar: Japan's Foreign Trade in the Seventeenth Century. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
IOR/A/2/3, Charter Granted to the East India Company from 1601; and also Treaties and Grants, made with, or obtained from, the Princes and Powers in India, from the year 1756 to 1772.Google Scholar
IOR/E/3/33, East India Company Original Correspondence (1672–1673). Henry Dacres and Council at Bantam to the “King” of Tonkin, Henry Dacres and Council at Bantam to the “Prince” of Tonkin.Google Scholar
IOR/E/3/64, East India Company Original Correspondence, 24 March 1702–27 October 1702.Google Scholar
IOR/E/94, Letter book XI (New Company), 1699–1709.Google Scholar
IOR/G/12/17-1, Tonqueen Journall Register, 25 July 1672–7 December 1672.Google Scholar
IOR/G/12/17-2, W. Gyfford's Journall at Tonqueen, 13 December 1672–28 June 1676.Google Scholar
IOR/G/12/17-3, Tonqueen Journall Register, 29 June 1676–26 June 1677.Google Scholar
IOR/G/12/17-4, Diary and Consultations of T. James and W. Keeling, 06 June 1677–24 June 1678.Google Scholar
IOR/G/12/17-5, Tonqueen Journall Register, 02 July 1678–28 May 1679.Google Scholar
IOR/G/12/17-6, Tonqueen Journall Register, 01 June 1679–31 May 1680.Google Scholar
IOR/G/12/17-8, Diary and Consultations of W. Hodges, 29 July 1682–26 August 1683.Google Scholar
IOR/G/12/17-9, Tonqueen Diary and Consultations, 13 May 1693–21 July 1697.Google Scholar
IOR/G/40/18, Factory records: Miscellaneous – Thomas Bowyear's mission from Fort St. George to Cochinchina (1695–1696).Google Scholar
IOR/H/628, Miscellaneous Collection Firmans & Treaties 1602–1753, King of Cochinchina to the Great General in Pulo-Condore, 2 August 1703.Google Scholar
Jansson, Maija (2005). “Measured Reciprocity: English Ambassadorial Gift Exchange in the 17th and 18th Centuries.” Journal of Early Modern History 9:3–4, pp. 348–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Liam C. (2006). “Confucianism in Vietnam: A State of the Field Essay.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 1:1–2, pp. 314–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klekar, Cynthia (2006). “Prisoners in Silken Bonds: Obligation, Trade, and Diplomacy in English Voyages to Japan and China.” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 6:1, pp. 84105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Alastair (1970). The Mandarin Road to Old Hue: The Narrative of Anglo–Vietnamese Diplomacy From the Seventeenth Century to the Eve of the French Conquest. London: Archon Books Publishers.Google Scholar
Lawson, Philipp (1993). The East India Company, A History. London and New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Li, Tana (1998a). Nguyen Cochinchina: Southern Vietnam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Tana (1998b). “An Alternative Vietnam? The Nguyen Kingdom in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 29:1, pp. 111–21.Google Scholar
Loomba, Ania (2009). “Of Gifts, Ambassadors, and Copy-Cats: Diplomacy, Exchange, and Difference in Early Modern India.” In Emissaries in Early Modern Literature and Culture, eds. Shahani, Gitanjali & Charry, Brinda, pp. 4175. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lương, Thy Cân (2020). “Chiến lược khoan hòa và liên minh của các chúa Nguyễn nhằm phát triển xứ Đàng Trong (thế kỷ XVI-XVIII).” [The strategy of harmony and alliance of the Nguyen Lords of Cochinchina in order to develop the Inner-region (16th-18th centuries)] Nghiên cch LLhi ss [Historical Studies] 10:534, pp. 3138.Google Scholar
Ma, Yi Yi (1958). English Trade in the South China Sea 1670–1715. PhD Dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. J. (2001). “The English in Asia to 1700.” In The Oxford History of the British Empire. Vol. 1: The Origins of Empire, ed. Nicholas, Canny, pp. 264–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Massarella, D. (1990). A World Elsewhere: Europe's Encounter with Japan in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Massarella, D. (1993). “Chinese, Tartars and ‘Thea’ or a Tale of Two Companies: The English East India Company and Taiwan in the Late Seventeenth Century.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 3:3, pp. 393426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maybon, C. B. (1910). “Une factorerie anglaise au Tonkin au XVIIe siècle (1672–1697).” Bulletin de l”Ecole francaise d”Extreme-Orient 10:1, pp. 159204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, João (2013). “Seeking Prestige and Survival: Gift-Exchange Practices Between the Portuguese Estado da India and Asian Rulers.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 56:4–5, pp. 672–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, Rupali (2014). “Diplomacy at the Edge: Split Interests in the Roe Embassy to the Mughal Court.” Journal of British Studies 53:1, pp. 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, H. B. (1926). The Chronicles of the East India Company Trading to China, 1635–1834, Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Na Pombejra, Dhiravat (2013). “The Voyage of the Sea Adventure to Ayutthaya, 1615–1618: The English East India Company and Its Siam-Japan Trade.” International Journal on the History of European Expansion and Global Interaction 37:3, pp. 4969.Google Scholar
Ngô, Cao Lãng (Vietnamese translation from Sino) (1975). Lịch triều tạp kỷ, tập 1, [Miscellaneous Records of Successive Dynasties]. Hanoi: Social Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Nguyễn, Hồng (2009). Lịch sử truyền giáo ở Việt Nam, quyển 2 [History of Christian transmission in Vietnam, Vol. 2]. Hanoi: Tu dien Bach khoa Publishers.Google Scholar
Nguyễn, Ngọc Nhuận (ed) (2006). Một số văn bản điển chế và pháp luật Việt Nam, tập 1 [Some dynastic institutions and law documents in Vietnam, Vol. 1]. Hanoi: Social Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Osborne, Toby and Rubiés, Joan-Pau (2016). “Introduction: Diplomacy and Cultural Translation in the Early Modern World.” Journal of Early Modern History 20:4, pp. 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phan, Huy Chú (Vietnamese translation from Sino) (1992). Lịch triều Hiến chương loại chí [Annals of the Laws and Institutions of Successive Dynasties]. Hanoi, Social Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Purnell, C. J. (ed) (1916). The Logbook of William Adams 1614–1619, with the Journal of Edward Saris and Other Documents Relations to Japan, Cochinchina. London: The Eastern Press.Google Scholar
Quốc sử quán triều Nguyễn [State Bureau of History] (Vietnamese translation from Sino by Historical Institute) (first printed in 1884, re-printed in 2007), Khâm định Việt sử thông giám cương mục, tập 2 [Text and explanation forming the compete mirror of the history of Vietnam, vol. 2]. Hanoi: Education Publishers.Google Scholar
Quốc sử quán triều Nguyễn [State Bureau of History] (Vietnamese translation from Sino) (first printed in 1844, re-printed in 1994), Đại Nam thực lục, Tiền Biên [Veritable Records of the Nguyễn Dynasty, Initial Period]. Hanoi: Social Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony (1993). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450–1680, Vol. 2: Expansion and Crisis. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Edmond. (2013). “Naval Violence and Trading Privileges in early Seventeenth-Century Asia.International Journal of Maritime History 25:2, pp. 147158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, P.J. (2008). “A Politie of Civil & Military Power: Political Thought and the Late Seventeenth-Century Foundations of the East India Company-State.Journal of British Studies 47:2, pp. 253283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, P.J. (2009). “History and Historiography of the English East India Company: Past, Present, and Future.History Compass 7:4, pp. 11461180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, P. J. (2011). The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarling, Nicholas (1992). The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, Vol.1: From Early Times to c.1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. M. (2010). Diary of Richard Cocks, Cape-Merchant in the English Factory in Japan, 1615–1622, 2 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tremml-Werner, Birgit, Helleman, Lisa and Van Meersbergen, Guido (2020). “Introduction: Gift and Tribute in Early Modern Diplomacy: Afro-Eurasian Perspectives.” Diplomatica 2:2, pp. 185200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turton, Andrew (2016). “Disappointing Gifts: Dialectics of Gift Exchange in Early Modern European-East Asian Diplomatic Practice.” Journal of the Siam Society 104, pp. 111–27Google Scholar
Van Meersbergen, Guido (2018). “Diplomacy in a Provincial Setting: The East India Companies in Seventeenth-Century Bengal and Orissa.” In The Dutch and English East India Companies: Diplomacy, Trade and Violence in Early Modern Asia, ed. Clulow, Adam and Mostert, Tristan, pp. 5578. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Meersbergen, Guido (2019). “The Diplomatic Repertoires of the East India Companies in Mughal South Asia, 1608–1717.” The Historical Journal 62:4, pp. 875–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Meersbergen, Guido (2020). “Intirely the Kings Vassalls”: East India Company Gifting Practices and Anglo–Mughal Political Exchange (c.1670–1720).” Diplomatica 2:2, pp. 270–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, James M. (2018). “John Company Armed: The Eglish East India Company, the Anglo-Mughal War and Absolustist Imperialism, c.1675-1690.Britain and the World 11:1, pp. 101137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veevers, D. (2013). “The Company as Their Lords and the Deputy as a Great Rajah: Imperial Expansion and the English East India Company on the West Coast of Sumatra, 1685–1730.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 41:5, pp. 687709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veevers, Davis and Pettigrew, W. A. (2020). “Trading Companies and Business Diplomacy in the Early Modern World.” Diplomatica 2:1, pp. 3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, Laurence (2015). “Anglo-Chinese Caresses: Civility, Friendship and Trade in English Representations of China, 1760-1800.Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 38 :2, pp. 277296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, J. E. (2011). China and Maritime Europe, 1500–1800: Trade, Settlement, Diplomacy, and Missions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Windler, C. (2001). “Diplomatic History as a Field for Cultural Analysis: Muslim-Cultural Relations in Tunis, 1700–1840.” The Historical Journal 44:1, pp. 79106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, D. Tze-Ken (2012). “The Destruction of the English East India Company Factory on Condore Island, 1702–1705.” Modern Asian Studies 46:2, pp. 1097–115.Google Scholar
Woodside, A. B. (1971). Vietnam and the Chinese Model: A Comparative Study of Vietnamese and Chinese Government in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar