Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T02:10:03.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solar Magnetic Fields and Dynamo Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2017

A. Brandenburg
Affiliation:
Observatory and Astrophysics Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Tahtitorninmäki, SF-00130 Helsinki, Finland
I. Tuominen
Affiliation:
Observatory and Astrophysics Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Tahtitorninmäki, SF-00130 Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have computed kineamtic dynamo models for the Sun making realistic assumptions about the different induction effects. Recent results of helioseismology are used to infer the differential rotation. By changing the value of the angular velocity at the bottom of the convection zone in the models we find more or less agreement with the observations.

Type
Session III: Theory
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1989

References

Bai, T.: 1988, Astrophys. J. 328, 860.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, A., Tuominen, J.: 1988, Adv. Space Res., in press.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, A., Krause, F., Meiuel, R., Moss, D., and Tuominen, I.: 1988a, Astron. Astrophys. in press.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, A., Moss, D., Tuominen, I., 1988b, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., submitted.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, A., Rädlor, K.H., Tuominen, I., 1988c, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., submitted.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, A., Krause, F., Tuominen, I.: 1988d, in Nonlinear Phenomena in MHD Turbulence, eds. Pouquet, A., Meneguzzi, M. and Salem, P.L., Elsevier Science Publ. B.V., in press.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, A., Pulkkinen, P., Tuominen, I., Nordlnnd, Á, Stein, R. F.: 1988e, in Nonlinear Phenomena in MHD Turbulence, eds. Pouquet, A., Meneguzzi, M. and Salem, P.L., Elsevier Science Publ. M.V., in press.Google Scholar
Brown, T. M., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Dziembowski, W. A., Goode, P., Gongh, D.O., Morrow, C. A.: 1988, Astrophys. J. submitted.Google Scholar
Duvall, T.L. Jr., Harvey, J.W.: 1981, Nature 310, 19.Google Scholar
Hill, F.: 1987 in: The Internal Solar Angular Velocity, eds. Durney, B.R. and Sofia, S., D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 45.Google Scholar
Hill, F., Rust, D.M., Appourchaux, T. 1988, in: Advances in Helio- and Asteroscisinology, eds. Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. and Frandsen, S., D. Reidel Dordrecht, p. 49.Google Scholar
Makarov, V.I., Fatianov, M.P., Sivaraman, K.R.: 1983, Solar Phya. 85, 215.Google Scholar
Makarov, V.I., Ruzmaikin, A.A., Starchenko, S.V.: 1988, Solar Phys. 111, 207.Google Scholar
Roberts, P.H. and Stix, M.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 18, 453.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, H. B.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 270, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbeck, M., Krause, F., Rädler, K.H.: 1966, Z. Naturforscj. 21a, 369.Google Scholar
Steenbeck, M. and Krause, F.: 1969, Astron. Nachr. 291, 49.Google Scholar
Stenllo, J.O.: 1988, Astron. Astrophys. submitted.Google Scholar
Tuominen, I., and Virtanen, H.: 1988, Adv. Space Res., in press.Google Scholar
Tuominen, J.: 1962, Z. Astrophys., 55, 110.Google Scholar