Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T13:19:41.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Science Aspects of 1980 Ballistic Missions to Comet Encke, Using Mariner and Pioneer Spacecraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper considers science aspects of a 1980 spacecraft reconnaissance of Comet Encke. The mission discussed is a ballistic flyby (more exactly, a fly-through) of P/Encke, using either a spin-stabilized spacecraft, without despin of instruments, or a 3-axis-stabilized spacecraft. Celestial mechanics and imaging aspects of such a mission have been considered in more detail by Bender (1) and by Jaffe et al (2), respectively. Engineering designs (3, 4) and more detailed accounts of science aspects are given in other documents. A different approach to an Encke ballistic flyby has been suggested by Farquahar et al (5). Yeomans (6) has considered ephemeris uncertainties associated with such missions.

Type
Part II
Copyright
Copyright © NASA 1976

References

1. Bender, D., “Encke Ballistic Flybys in 1980,” AIAA Paper 74–782, AIAA, New York, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Jaffe, L. D., Bender, D., Hughes, R. O., Markiewicz, B. R. and Thorpe, T. E., “Imaging on Ballistic Missions to Comet Encke,” AIAA Paper 7587, AIAA, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
3. Bursnall, W., “Ballistic Mission to the Comet Encke in 1980 – A New Phase of Solar System Exploration,” Proc. 11th Space Congress, Canaveral Council of Technical Societies, Cocoa Beach, Florida, 1974.Google Scholar
4. Nock, K. T. and Yeates, C. M., “Early Mariner Comet Flyby,” AIAA Paper 75198, AIAA, New York, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Farquahar, R. W., McCarthy, D. K., Muhonen, D. P. and Yeomans, D. K., “Mission Design for a Ballistic Slow Flyby of Comet Encke 1980,” NASA TN D-7726, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Yeomans, D. K., “Orbital Error Analysis for Comet Encke,” this volume, 1975.Google Scholar
7. Sekanina, Z., “A Continuing Controversy: Has the Cometary Nucleus Been Resolved?”, this volume, 1975.Google Scholar
8. Taylor, F. W., Michaux, C. M., Newburn, R. L. Jr., “A Model of the Physical Properties of Comet Encke,” Tech. Rept. 32–1590, Jet Propulsion Lab., California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1973.Google Scholar